Suppr超能文献

瑞德西韦用于曾住院的COVID-19患者的真实世界证据:患者报告的结果和功能结局

Real-world evidence of remdesivir in formerly hospitalized COVID-19 patients: patient-reported and functional outcomes.

作者信息

Fésü Dorottya, Bárczi Enikő, Csoma Balázs, Polivka Lőrinc, Boga Márton, Horváth Gábor, Varga János Tamás, Sebők Szilvia, Müller Veronika

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10398-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-COVID condition (PCC) is characterized by persisting symptoms after the resolution of acute COVID-19. Remdesivir (RDV), a broad-spectrum antiviral drug, has been widely used in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring oxygen therapy. We aimed to evaluate the effects of RDV on PCC by assessing patient-reported and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We used the data from a single-center registry, including formerly hospitalized post-COVID patients (N = 293). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used (16 criteria, 1:1 ratio) to obtain two comparable groups: those who received standard-of-care (SOC, N = 94) and those treated with RDV in addition to SOC (SOC + RDV, N = 94). Primary outcomes were asymptomatic status and at least 50% symptom score reduction at post-COVID follow-up. Secondary outcomes included results of pulmonary function (PF) tests, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires.

RESULTS

After PSM, baseline patient characteristics showed no significant differences between the two groups. Most patients were still symptomatic (60% vs. 66%). In the SOC + RDV group, the use of oxygen supplementation (94 vs. 80%, p = 0.005) and steroids (97 vs. 88%, p = 0.027) during infection were higher, while patients presented at their post-COVID visits earlier (median 68 vs. 97 days, p = 0.003). Complete or at least 50% symptom resolution were reported at a significantly earlier stage after infection in the SOC + RDV group compared to the SOC group (multivariable-adjusted HR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.33-3.92, p = 0.003; and HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.43-3.02, p < 0.001; respectively). In the SOC + RDV group, fewer patients experienced sleep disturbances at PCC, and sleep-related questionnaires (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) results showed significantly better sleep quality (14 vs. 27% and 5.9 vs. 7.7 points, respectively). There were no notable differences in results of PF tests, 6MWT, and other QoL questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

In this propensity score matched cohort, the use of RDV was associated with earlier patient reported symptom resolution during the PCC period, while there were no notable differences in functional outcomes. Our results indicate a possible beneficial effect of RDV in terms of faster symptom resolution after COVID19 infection.

摘要

背景

新冠后状况(PCC)的特征是急性新冠病毒病(COVID-19)缓解后仍持续存在症状。瑞德西韦(RDV)是一种广谱抗病毒药物,已广泛用于因COVID-19住院且需要吸氧治疗的患者。我们旨在通过评估患者报告的结果和功能结局来评估RDV对PCC的影响。

方法

我们使用了来自单中心登记处的数据,包括曾住院的新冠后患者(N = 293)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)(16项标准,1:1比例)获得两个可比组:接受标准治疗(SOC,N = 94)的患者和除SOC外还接受RDV治疗的患者(SOC + RDV,N = 94)。主要结局是在新冠后随访时无症状状态和症状评分至少降低50%。次要结局包括肺功能(PF)测试、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)和生活质量(QoL)问卷的结果。

结果

PSM后,两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。大多数患者仍有症状(60%对66%)。在SOC + RDV组中,感染期间使用补充氧气(94%对80%,p = 0.005)和类固醇(97%对88%,p = 0.027)的比例更高,而患者在新冠后就诊时更早(中位数68天对97天,p = 0.003)。与SOC组相比,SOC + RDV组在感染后显著更早阶段报告了完全或至少50%的症状缓解(多变量调整后的HR = 2.28,95%CI = 1.33 - 3.92,p = 0.003;以及HR = 2.08,95%CI = 1.43 - 3.02,p < 0.001;分别)。在SOC + RDV组中,PCC时经历睡眠障碍的患者较少,与睡眠相关的问卷(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,PSQI)结果显示睡眠质量明显更好(分别为14%对27%和5.9分对7.7分)。PF测试、6MWT和其他QoL问卷的结果没有显著差异。

结论

在这个倾向评分匹配队列中,使用RDV与PCC期间患者报告的症状更早缓解相关,而功能结局没有显著差异。我们的结果表明RDV在COVID-19感染后更快缓解症状方面可能具有有益作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4dc/11715443/6cfd4f10fb1e/12879_2024_10398_Fig2_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验