Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen and naproxen in the treatment of oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: bi-national cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in children. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra-articular corticosteroid injections are first-line therapy for oligoarticular JIA. NSAIDs Adverse events (AEs) include gastrointestinal ulcers/bleeding and impaired renal function. The most prescribed NSAIDs for oligoarticular JIA are ibuprofen and naproxen. However, direct comparison between these drugs is lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen versus naproxen for oligoarticular JIA.

METHODS

This is a bi-national retrospective study of oligoarticular JIA patients treated with either ibuprofen or naproxen as first-line therapy. Efficacy was defined as patients that achieved complete response (no evidence for arthritis). Safety was assessed by the occurrence of adverse events during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 164 patients, 103 were treated in the Israeli group and 61 in the US group. The study population had a mean age of 4.49 ± 3.55 years, with F:M ratio of ∼2.5:1. No significant difference was found in drug efficacy [Complete response was observed in 15% of the ibuprofen group . 17.3% in naproxen group ( = 0.7)]. Treatment duration > 28 days was associated with significantly higher odds for complete response ( = 0.021). For safety, 12 AEs were associated with naproxen, whereas no AEs were associated with ibuprofen ( = 0.004). Treatment was discontinued in all AEs cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibuprofen and naproxen showed similar albeit low efficacy which emphasizes their role as bridging therapy until IACI is achieved. However, ibuprofen showed better safety profile naproxen and therefore should be considered as first-line therapy.