• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

20-22G第二代内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检针在上消化道及邻近器官实性病变中的不良事件:系统评价与荟萃分析

Adverse events of 20-22G second-generation endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy needles for solid lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pan Cheng-Ye, Wang Shi-Min, Cai Dong-Hao, Ma Jia-Yi, Li Shi-Yu, Guo Yibin, Jing Sun, Zhendong Jin, Wang Kaixuan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2025 May;37(5):490-500. doi: 10.1111/den.14972. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1111/den.14972
PMID:39789825
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Previous research has conducted meta-analyses on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). However, studies on adverse events (AEs) have been limited and sporadic and have included a highly diverse group of patients (with upper and lower gastrointestinal tract issues) and needles of varying sizes (19-22-25G). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of AEs related to the utilization of 20-22G second-generation EUS-FNB needles subsequent to puncture of the upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and SCIE databases from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. The primary outcome was percentage of summary AEs. Subgroup analyses were based on needle type, needle size, and lesion site.

RESULTS

A total of 99 studies were included in the analysis, with 9303 patients. The overall AE rate for 20-22G second generation EUS-FNB needles in upper gastrointestinal EUS-FNB was 1.8% (166/9303), with bleeding being the most common AE at 44.0%. The percentages of pancreatitis, abdominal pain, and other AEs were 24.1%, 21.1%, and 10.8%, respectively. Patients undergoing hepatic EUS-FNB had the highest incidence of AEs at 14.0%, followed by submucosal lesions at 3.2% and pancreatic lesions at 2.6%.

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNB is a safe procedure with a relatively low risk of upper gastrointestinal AEs (1.8%) and no associated deaths. Postoperative bleeding and pancreatitis are the most common complications of EUS-FNB. Most AEs are mild and self-limiting in severity, and serious complications are very rare.

摘要

目的

既往研究已对内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)的诊断准确性进行了荟萃分析。然而,关于不良事件(AE)的研究有限且零散,纳入的患者群体高度多样化(包括上、下消化道问题),且针的尺寸各异(19G - 22G - 25G)。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定在对上消化道及相邻器官进行穿刺后,使用20 - 22G第二代EUS-FNB针相关的不良事件发生率。

方法

我们检索了2010年1月1日至2023年12月31日的PubMed、Embase和SCIE数据库。主要结局是汇总不良事件的百分比。亚组分析基于针的类型、针的尺寸和病变部位。

结果

分析共纳入99项研究,9303例患者。在上消化道EUS-FNB中,20 - 22G第二代EUS-FNB针的总体不良事件发生率为1.8%(166/9303),出血是最常见的不良事件,占44.0%。胰腺炎、腹痛和其他不良事件的百分比分别为24.1%、21.1%和10.8%。接受肝脏EUS-FNB的患者不良事件发生率最高,为14.0%,其次是黏膜下病变患者,为3.2%,胰腺病变患者为2.6%。

结论

EUS-FNB是一种安全的操作,上消化道不良事件风险相对较低(1.8%),且无相关死亡病例。术后出血和胰腺炎是EUS-FNB最常见的并发症。大多数不良事件程度较轻且为自限性,严重并发症非常罕见。

相似文献

1
Adverse events of 20-22G second-generation endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy needles for solid lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.20-22G第二代内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检针在上消化道及邻近器官实性病变中的不良事件:系统评价与荟萃分析
Dig Endosc. 2025 May;37(5):490-500. doi: 10.1111/den.14972. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review.上消化道黏膜下病变内镜及 EUS 引导下活检技术的诊断率:系统评价。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jun;99(6):895-911.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
3
EUS FNAC without rapid on-site evaluation is comparable to EUS FNB with macroscopic on-site evaluation in evaluation of intra-abdominal masses.在评估腹腔内肿块时,未进行快速现场评估的超声内镜细针穿刺抽吸活检(EUS FNAC)与进行宏观现场评估的超声内镜细针活检(EUS FNB)效果相当。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s12664-025-01741-3.
4
Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.不同内镜技术对上消化道黏膜下病变组织取样的诊断效能比较:网状 Meta 分析。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):31-40. doi: 10.1055/a-2156-0063. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.22G与25G针在超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检评估实性胰腺肿块中的效率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018;73:e261. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e261. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针的大小对 EUS 引导下的细针抽吸的结果只有有限的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Apr;58(4):1026-34. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2439-2. Epub 2012 Oct 21.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.穿刺次数对胰腺实性肿块超声内镜细针穿刺活检诊断性能的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Oct;100(4):595-604.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.05.022. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
9
Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.对比分析端切式细针活检针对胰腺实体肿块 EUS 组织采样的诊断性能:一项网络荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1067-1077.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EUS 引导下的细针活检取样的宏观现场评估的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec;96(6):909-917.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.026. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Smear Provides Better Sensitivity and Adequacy Rates After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Abdominal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.联合液基细胞学和传统涂片在超声内镜引导下获取腹部肿块组织后具有更高的敏感性和充足率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 22;14(18):6685. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186685.
2
Clinical significance and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for para-aortic lymph node metastasis.内镜超声引导下获取主动脉旁淋巴结转移组织的临床意义及疗效
Dig Endosc. 2025 Jul;37(7):775-786. doi: 10.1111/den.15009. Epub 2025 Mar 10.