Siwa Maria, Banik Anna, Szczuka Zofia, Kulis Ewa, Boberska Monika, Wietrzykowska Dominika, Knoll Nina, DeLongis Anita, Knäuper Bärbel, Luszczynska Aleksandra
Wroclaw Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University, Ostrowskiego 30b5, 53-238 Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae092.
The close relationship processes and health model and the dyadic health influence model posit that relationship beliefs (eg, relationship satisfaction) and influence strategies (eg, provision and receipt of positive and negative social control) mediate health behavior change. However, evidence for such mediation in parent-child dyads is limited.
Two complementary mediation hypotheses were tested: (1) social control forms indirect relationships with sedentary behavior (SB), via relationship satisfaction acting as a mediator; and (2) relationship satisfaction forms indirect relationships with SB, with social control operating as a mediator.
Data from 247 parent-child dyads (9- to 15-year-old children) were analyzed using manifest mediation models. SB was measured with GT3X-BT accelerometers at Time 1 (T1; baseline) and Time 3 (T3; 8-month follow-up). Relationship satisfaction and social control were assessed at T1 and Time 2 (T2; 2-month follow-up). Path analysis models, controlling for baseline SB, were fit.
Received positive control (children, T1) was associated with higher relationship satisfaction in both children and parents (T2), which in turn were related to lower and higher parental SB at T3, respectively. Provided positive control (parents; T1) was related to higher SB (T3) in children. Relationship satisfaction among children (T1) predicted higher levels of received positive and negative control (children, T2).
Provided and received positive social control may form direct and indirect associations with SB in parent-child dyads. Future research may need to consider further subtypes of positive control, which may explain the divergent effects of this form of control on SB.
亲密关系过程与健康模型以及二元健康影响模型认为,关系信念(如关系满意度)和影响策略(如给予和接受积极与消极的社会控制)介导健康行为的改变。然而,在亲子二元组中这种中介作用的证据有限。
检验两个互补的中介假设:(1)社会控制通过作为中介的关系满意度与久坐行为(SB)形成间接关系;(2)关系满意度通过作为中介的社会控制与SB形成间接关系。
使用显变量中介模型分析了来自247个亲子二元组(9至15岁儿童)的数据。在第1次测量(T1;基线)和第3次测量(T3;8个月随访)时,使用GT3X - BT加速度计测量SB。在T1和第2次测量(T2;2个月随访)时评估关系满意度和社会控制。拟合了控制基线SB的路径分析模型。
接受的积极控制(儿童,T1)与儿童和父母在T2时更高的关系满意度相关,而这又分别与T3时父母更低和更高的SB相关。给予的积极控制(父母;T1)与儿童更高的SB(T3)相关。儿童的关系满意度(T1)预测了接受的更高水平的积极和消极控制(儿童,T2)。
给予和接受的积极社会控制可能在亲子二元组中与SB形成直接和间接关联。未来的研究可能需要考虑积极控制的进一步亚型,这可能解释这种控制形式对SB的不同影响。