BACKGROUND

Acne is a common condition observed in adolescents and in most severe acne the scars develop. There are numerous treatment options for acne scars. However, no standardized guidelines have been established to guide physicians in the optimal treatment of acne scars.

AIMS

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the existing evidence on various fillers used for the treatment of acne scars and to compare their effectiveness with one another.

METHODS

The study was designed following PRISMA guidelines, and the information was retrieved in May 2024 using the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov registry. The inclusion criteria were that studies involving patients of any age or gender with acne scars of any type treated with synthetic dermal fillers, and studies published in English. The exclusion criteria were studies with less than 10 participants and studies that did not use synthetic dermal fillers. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool was used for randomized controlled trials, and in observational studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included with a total of 1121 participants. Fourteen studies evaluated HA on 372 subjects, five studies focused on PMMA on 305 subjects, four on CaHA on 392 subjects, two on PLLA on 42 subjects, and one on PCL on 10 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the studies included in this review were of low quality, as indicated by their scores on quality assessments, lack of high-quality RCTs, and small sample sizes. Future research should focus on conducting randomized, controlled, split-face studies with an adequate number of participants and a detailed examination of different scar subtypes.