DiChiacchio Laura, Castro-Varela Alejandra, Vervoort Dominique, Fiedler Amy G
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2022 Dec 12;1(1):216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2022.12.004. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Access to cardiac surgical services is limited in low- and middle-income countries. The shortage of cardiac surgical care providers is a major contributor to this limited access to lifesaving care. Task shifting and task sharing allow nonspecialists to perform roles typically reserved for specialists such as cardiothoracic surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists, and other health care workers with specific training in cardiac surgical care. Task sharing has increased access to care without compromising outcomes in related surgical fields, such as general surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurologic surgery, and obstetrics and gynecologic surgery.
A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews using the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, and Web of Science. The search was constructed to identify articles specifically addressing task sharing in cardiac surgical care.
Four relevant articles were identified. Only 1 focused on task sharing specifically by cardiac surgeons; this was a case study of 2 surgeons at a single hospital who used task sharing with junior surgeons to varying degrees. Two studies discussed task sharing as part of a team-based approach to the management of rheumatic heart disease; 1 study discussed cost-effectiveness in the delivery of cardiac surgical care and included task sharing as 1 approach to cost reduction.
There is a paucity of literature describing the applications and outcomes of task sharing in cardiac surgery in variable-resource contexts. Here, we present a scoping review summarizing the literature on experiences with task sharing for cardiac surgical care.
在低收入和中等收入国家,获得心脏外科服务的机会有限。心脏外科护理提供者的短缺是导致这种获得挽救生命护理机会有限的主要因素。任务转移和任务分担使非专科医生能够承担通常由专科医生担任的角色,如心胸外科医生、心脏麻醉师以及其他接受过心脏外科护理专门培训的医护人员。任务分担增加了获得护理的机会,同时在相关外科领域(如普通外科、整形外科、神经外科以及妇产科手术)并未影响治疗效果。
根据系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR),使用PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、世界卫生组织全球医学索引和科学网数据库进行了一项范围综述。该检索旨在识别专门论述心脏外科护理中任务分担的文章。
共识别出4篇相关文章。仅有1篇专门聚焦心脏外科医生的任务分担;这是对一家医院的2名外科医生的案例研究,他们在不同程度上与初级外科医生采用了任务分担。2项研究将任务分担作为基于团队的风湿性心脏病管理方法的一部分进行了讨论;1项研究讨论了心脏外科护理提供中的成本效益,并将任务分担作为降低成本的一种方法纳入其中。
在资源各异的情况下,描述心脏外科中任务分担应用及结果的文献匮乏。在此,我们呈现一项范围综述,总结关于心脏外科护理任务分担经验的文献。