Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Women's Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):34-42. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13003.
We performed a country case study using thematic analysis of interviews and existing grey and published literature to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of midwife-provided abortion care in Sweden. Identified facilitating factors were: (1) the historical role and high status of Swedish midwives; (2) Swedish research and development of medical abortion that enabled an enlarged clinical role for midwives; (3) collaborations between individual clinicians and researchers within the professional associations, and the autonomy of clinical units to implement changes in clinical practice; (4) a historic precedent of changes in abortion policy occurring without prior official or legal sanction; (5) a context of liberal abortion laws, secularity, gender equality, public support for abortion, trust in public institutions; and (6) an increasing global interest in task-shifting to increase access and reduce costs. Identified barriers/risks were: (1) the lack of systems for monitoring and evaluation; and (2) a loss of physician competence in abortion care.
我们进行了一项国家案例研究,采用主题分析的方法对访谈和现有的灰色文献和已发表文献进行分析,以确定在瑞典实施助产士提供的堕胎护理的促进因素和障碍。确定的促进因素有:(1)瑞典助产士的历史角色和高地位;(2)瑞典在药物流产方面的研究和发展,使助产士能够扩大临床角色;(3)专业协会内部的个别临床医生和研究人员之间的合作,以及临床单位在实施临床实践变革方面的自主权;(4)堕胎政策变革的历史先例,没有事先获得官方或法律认可;(5)自由的堕胎法律、世俗性、性别平等、公众对堕胎的支持、对公共机构的信任的背景;以及(6)全球对任务转移以增加获取途径和降低成本的日益关注。确定的障碍/风险有:(1)缺乏监测和评估系统;以及(2)医生在堕胎护理方面的能力丧失。