Summerson Acelyne Marie, Kalosieh Jordan, Kompella Sindhura, Villalba Clara Alvarez, Kodali Yukthi
HCA Florida Aventura Hospital, Aventura, FL.
St George's University, Grenada, West Indies.
HCA Healthc J Med. 2024 Dec 1;5(6):661-670. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1637. eCollection 2024.
The United States Food and Drug Administration approved 6 atypical antipsychotics for pediatric treatment of schizophrenia. However, little has been published on the effectiveness of these medications in the acute treatment setting of adolescents with psychosis. Since the clinical uncertainty and poor prognosis proceeding the early onset of schizophrenia has a significant impact on a child's development, there is a critical need for evidence-based data on this population. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of various antipsychotics on young patients admitted to the inpatient ward presenting with acute psychosis.
A retrospective analysis was performed to review the medical records of the patients with specified schizophrenia disorders who were admitted to the inpatient psychiatric unit for treatment with antipsychotics. We analyzed the efficiency of treatment by measuring 30-day readmissions (yes/no), number of readmissions in 30 days, and the length of stay in the inpatient ward. Negative binomial regression and binary logistic regression were used to count the discrete occurrences of an outcome and predict the likelihood of that outcome.
We analyzed the medical records of 1117 patients who were assigned to groups based on whether they were treated with aripiprazole (31.9%), risperidone (26.0%), quetiapine (16.2%), and olanzapine (26.0%). Pairwise comparisons revealed receiving risperidone increased the log count of days by an incidence response ratio of 1.15 (1/0.87) compared to receiving aripiprazole ( < .05, 95% CI [0.76, 0.98]). Similarly, quetiapine increased the count of hospital days by a factor of 1.22 (1/0.82) ( < .01, 95% CI [0.70, 0.94]), as well as olanzapine by a factor of 1.23 (1/0.82) compared to receiving aripiprazole ( < .001, 95% CI [0.72, 0.93]). The number of admissions in 30 days was not significantly associated with medication groups (χ = 3.93, = .270) when controlling for other variables. The medication group was also not significantly associated with the likelihood of readmission (χ = 5.594, = .133) when controlling for other variables.
Aripiprazole was significantly associated with shortening the log count of days (χ = 21.82, < .0001) when compared to olanzapine and quetiapine. There was no statistical evidence to conclude a difference in readmission rates when comparing medication groups. To our knowledge, these results provide the largest cohort describing the efficacy of different antipsychotics for acute stabilization of psychosis in the inpatient setting.
美国食品药品监督管理局批准了6种非典型抗精神病药物用于儿童精神分裂症的治疗。然而,关于这些药物在青少年精神病急性治疗中的有效性,发表的研究较少。由于精神分裂症早期发病后的临床不确定性和不良预后对儿童发育有重大影响,因此迫切需要针对这一人群的循证数据。我们研究的目的是调查各种抗精神病药物对入住 inpatient ward(此处可能有误,推测为“住院病房”)且患有急性精神病的年轻患者的影响。
进行回顾性分析,以审查入住精神病住院单元并用抗精神病药物治疗的特定精神分裂症患者的病历。我们通过测量30天再入院情况(是/否)、30天内再入院次数以及住院病房的住院时间来分析治疗效果。负二项回归和二元逻辑回归用于计算结果的离散发生率并预测该结果的可能性。
我们分析了1117例患者的病历,这些患者根据是否接受阿立哌唑(31.9%)、利培酮(26.0%)、喹硫平(16.2%)和奥氮平(26.0%)治疗进行分组。两两比较显示,与接受阿立哌唑相比,接受利培酮使天数的对数计数增加,发生率反应比为1.15(1/0.87)(<0.05,95%置信区间[0.76,0.98])。同样,与接受阿立哌唑相比,喹硫平使住院天数增加了1.22倍(1/0.82)(<0.01,95%置信区间[0.70,0.94]),奥氮平使住院天数增加了1.23倍(1/0.82)(<0.001,95%置信区间[0.72,0.93])。在控制其他变量时,30天内的入院次数与药物组无显著关联(χ² = 3.93,P = 0.270)。在控制其他变量时,药物组与再入院可能性也无显著关联(χ² = 5.594,P = 0.133)。
与奥氮平和喹硫平相比,阿立哌唑与缩短天数的对数计数显著相关(χ² = 21.82,P < 0.0001)。比较药物组时,没有统计学证据表明再入院率存在差异。据我们所知,这些结果提供了最大的队列研究,描述了不同抗精神病药物在住院环境中对精神病急性稳定治疗的疗效。