• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of the Taking Care of Us Intervention for Couples Living With Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者伴侣“关爱我们”干预措施的可行性、可接受性及初步疗效
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 7;9(1):igae106. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae106. eCollection 2025.
2
Taking Care of Us© (TCU) study protocol: feasibility and acceptability of a dyadic intervention for couples living with heart failure.“关爱我们”(TCU)研究方案:针对心力衰竭患者夫妇的二元干预措施的可行性与可接受性
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jan 25;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01249-7.
3
A couple-based dyadic coping intervention for couples coping with colorectal cancer: A pilot feasibility study.一项针对结直肠癌患者配偶的二元应对干预措施:一项试点可行性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Apr;63:102226. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102226. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Stronger Together: Results from a Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial of a Dyadic Intervention to Improve Engagement in HIV Care Among Serodiscordant Male Couples in Three US Cities.《携手共进:一项在三个美国城市开展的针对 HIV 感染者异性性伴侣的双联干预以改善其 HIV 护理参与度的随机对照有效性试验结果》
AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2369-2381. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03199-8. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Feasibility and acceptability of an online mental health intervention for pregnant women and their partners: a mixed method study with a pilot randomized control trial.一项在线心理健康干预措施在孕妇及其伴侣中应用的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法研究,包含一项先导随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06031-4.
7
Family-Focused Facilitated Fitness: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Couple-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients and Their Caregiving Partners.以家庭为中心的促进式健身:基于夫妇的体力活动干预在造血细胞移植受者及其照顾伴侣中的可行性和可接受性。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Apr;30(4):450.e1-450.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.01.066. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
8
Rationale and study protocol for We-PAP: a randomized pilot/feasibility trial of a couples-based intervention to promote PAP adherence and sleep health compared to an educational control.We-PAP的原理与研究方案:一项随机试点/可行性试验,对比基于夫妻的干预措施(以促进巴氏涂片检查依从性和睡眠健康)与教育对照。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 6;8(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01089-x.
9
A pilot feasibility study of Exercising Together© during radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dyadic approach for patients and spouses.一项针对前列腺癌放疗期间共同锻炼©的试点可行性研究:一种针对患者及其配偶的二元方法。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Dec 8;7(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00952-7.
10
Exploring the feasibility and acceptability of couple-based psychosexual support following prostate cancer surgery: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.探索前列腺癌手术后基于夫妻的性心理支持的可行性和可接受性:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 May 24;15:183. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-183.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalizing Care for Informal Heart Failure Caregivers: Challenges and Practical Implications.为非正规心力衰竭护理人员提供个性化护理:挑战与实际意义。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025 Apr 8;22(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s11897-025-00703-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Synthesizing Best Practices to Promote Health Equity for Older Adults Through Community-Engaged Research.通过社区参与式研究促进老年人健康公平的最佳实践综合。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb;17(1):9-16. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20231205-01. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
2
Spousal Concordance of Hypertension Among Middle-Aged and Older Heterosexual Couples Around the World: Evidence From Studies of Aging in the United States, England, China, and India.全球中老年异性夫妻高血压的一致性:来自美国、英国、中国和印度老年研究的证据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 19;12(24):e030765. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030765. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Heart Failure Epidemiology and Outcomes Statistics: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America.心力衰竭流行病学与结局统计:美国心力衰竭学会报告
J Card Fail. 2023 Oct;29(10):1412-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
4
Refinement of an Emergency Department-Based, Advance Care Planning Intervention for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers.基于急诊科的认知障碍患者及其照护者的预先医疗指示计划干预的精细化研究。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jan 1;64(1). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad020.
5
Projecting the chronic disease burden among the adult population in the United States using a multi-state population model.利用多州人口模型预测美国成年人口的慢性病负担。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;10:1082183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1082183. eCollection 2022.
6
Taking Care of Us© (TCU) study protocol: feasibility and acceptability of a dyadic intervention for couples living with heart failure.“关爱我们”(TCU)研究方案:针对心力衰竭患者夫妇的二元干预措施的可行性与可接受性
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jan 25;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01249-7.
7
A developmental-contextual model of couple synchrony across adulthood and old age.成年期和老年期夫妻同步的发展-情境模型。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Dec;36(8):943-956. doi: 10.1037/pag0000651. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
8
Using a Warm Hand-Off Approach to Enroll African American Caregivers in a Multi-Site Clinical Trial: The Handshake Protocol.采用温馨交接方式招募非裔美国家庭照顾者参与多中心临床试验:握手方案。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Jan;41(1):142-147. doi: 10.1177/0733464821992920. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Better Together? A Pilot Study of Romantic Partner Influence on Exercise Adherence and Cardiometabolic Risk in African-American Couples.《结伴而行?一项关于非裔美国夫妇中伴侣对运动坚持度和心血管代谢风险影响的初步研究》。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Dec;8(6):1492-1504. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00912-6. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
10
Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial.基于夫妻的沟通干预对头颈部癌症的影响:一项随机先导试验
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):3267-3275. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05848-5. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

心力衰竭患者伴侣“关爱我们”干预措施的可行性、可接受性及初步疗效

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of the Taking Care of Us Intervention for Couples Living With Heart Failure.

作者信息

Lyons Karen S, Whitlatch Carol J, Vest Amanda R, Upshaw Jenica N, Hutton Johnson Stacy, Walters Anna, Lee Christopher S

机构信息

William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.

Center for Research and Education, Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 7;9(1):igae106. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae106. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae106
PMID:39790834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11714155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite the significant impact of heart failure on both members of the care dyad, few interventions focus on optimizing the health of the dyad. The current study examined the feasibility and acceptability of the novel Taking Care of Us (TCU) program with mid-late-life couples living with heart failure and explored preliminary efficacy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This NIH Stage I study used a 2-arm randomized controlled trial with pretest-post-test design and an additional 5-month follow-up to compare TCU with an educational counseling attention-control condition. 37 couples were randomized to TCU (18 couples) or an educational control group (19 couples). Both programs were delivered virtually over 2 months.

RESULTS

Adults with heart failure were primarily male (mean age = 66.32, standard deviation [] = 13.72); partners were primarily female (mean age = 63.00,  = 12.73). Feasibility findings were mixed with over half of the eligible couples randomized, but only 67% of TCU couples completed the post-test. Acceptability of the TCU program was strong for both adults with heart failure and their partners. Recommendations for change focused on shortening session length, offering fewer sessions, and providing alternative modes of delivery. Exploratory between-group analyses found medium effect sizes for physical and mental health and dyadic management for both members of the couple, with many effects remaining 3 months later.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Findings suggest the TCU program is acceptable to couples with heart failure and shows promise for optimizing outcomes. Recommendations and strategies for improving retention and a more diverse sample are discussed.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04737759.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管心力衰竭对照护二元组的双方都有重大影响,但很少有干预措施专注于优化二元组的健康状况。本研究考察了针对患有心力衰竭的中老年夫妇的新型“关爱我们”(TCU)项目的可行性和可接受性,并探索了其初步疗效。

研究设计与方法

这项美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的I期研究采用双臂随机对照试验,采用前后测设计,并额外进行5个月的随访,以比较TCU项目与教育咨询对照条件。37对夫妇被随机分配到TCU组(18对夫妇)或教育对照组(19对夫妇)。两个项目均通过线上方式开展,为期2个月。

结果

患有心力衰竭的成年人主要为男性(平均年龄=66.32,标准差[]=13.72);其伴侣主要为女性(平均年龄=63.00,=12.73)。可行性结果喜忧参半,超过一半符合条件的夫妇被随机分组,但只有67%的TCU组夫妇完成了后测。TCU项目对患有心力衰竭的成年人及其伴侣的可接受性都很强。改进建议集中在缩短课程时长、减少课程数量以及提供其他授课方式。探索性组间分析发现,该项目对夫妇双方的身心健康和二元组管理有中等效应大小,许多效应在3个月后仍然存在。

讨论与启示

研究结果表明,TCU项目为患有心力衰竭的夫妇所接受,并有望优化治疗效果。文中讨论了提高留存率和扩大样本多样性的建议及策略。

临床试验注册

NCT04737759。