• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于夫妻的沟通干预对头颈部癌症的影响:一项随机先导试验

Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, 2200 W. Main St, Ste 340, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.

NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):3267-3275. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05848-5. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05848-5
PMID:33106976
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a couple-based supportive communication (CSC) intervention for head and neck cancer (HNC) delivered during patients' oncology treatment.

METHODS

Twenty couples were randomly assigned to either a four-session CSC or a treatment-as-usual (TAU) condition. The CSC intervention primarily focused on increasing couple emotional disclosure, supportive listening, and social support. Patients and partners completed measures of individual and relationship functioning at baseline, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight percent of CSC sessions were completed and couples reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. Between-group effect sizes indicated that patients and partners in CSC reported improvements in individual and relationship functioning, relative to those in the TAU condition.

CONCLUSIONS

A couple-based communication intervention delivered during oncology treatment is feasible and acceptable in the context of HNC and may lead to improvements in individual and relationship functioning. Preliminary efficacy results are interpreted in the context of social-cognitive processing and intimacy theories.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01785576) first posted on February 7, 2013.

摘要

目的

测试在头颈癌(HNC)患者接受肿瘤治疗期间提供的基于伴侣的支持性沟通(CSC)干预措施的可行性和初步疗效。

方法

将 20 对夫妇随机分配到四节 CSC 或常规治疗(TAU)组。CSC 干预主要侧重于增加夫妻双方的情感表达、支持性倾听和社会支持。患者和伴侣在基线、干预后和 6 个月随访时完成个体和关系功能的测量。

结果

98%的 CSC 疗程完成,夫妇对干预措施的满意度很高。组间效应大小表明,与 TAU 组相比,CSC 组的患者和伴侣在个体和关系功能方面都有所改善。

结论

在 HNC 背景下,在肿瘤治疗期间提供的基于伴侣的沟通干预是可行且可接受的,可能会改善个体和关系功能。初步疗效结果是根据社会认知加工和亲密关系理论进行解释的。

试验注册

该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT01785576)上注册,首次于 2013 年 2 月 7 日发布。

相似文献

1
Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial.基于夫妻的沟通干预对头颈部癌症的影响:一项随机先导试验
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):3267-3275. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05848-5. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
2
A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couples communication intervention for advanced GI cancer.一项针对晚期胃肠道癌症患者的视频会议夫妻沟通干预随机试点试验。
Psychooncology. 2017 Jul;26(7):1027-1035. doi: 10.1002/pon.4121. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
3
Self-management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: Results of a randomized pilot trial.头颈部癌症患者夫妻的自我管理干预:一项随机试点试验的结果。
Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;125(7):1176-1184. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31906. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
4
Exploring the feasibility and acceptability of couple-based psychosexual support following prostate cancer surgery: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.探索前列腺癌手术后基于夫妻的性心理支持的可行性和可接受性:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 May 24;15:183. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-183.
5
Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.聚焦于夫妻的干预措施对局限性前列腺癌男性及其配偶的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):396-418. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
6
A randomized pilot trial of a couple-based intervention addressing sexual concerns for breast cancer survivors.一项针对乳腺癌幸存者性问题的基于夫妇的干预措施的随机试点试验。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019 Mar-Apr;37(2):242-263. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1510869. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
7
Emotional disclosure and cognitive processing in couples coping with head and neck cancer.夫妻应对头颈部癌症中的情绪表露和认知加工。
J Behav Med. 2020 Jun;43(3):411-425. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00094-5. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer.一项针对结直肠癌患者身体亲密关系和性方面问题的基于电话的夫妻干预随机试点试验。
Psychooncology. 2014 Sep;23(9):1005-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.3508. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
Intimacy-enhancing psychological intervention for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study.增强亲密感的心理干预措施在前列腺癌患者及其伴侣中的应用:一项试点研究。
J Sex Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):1197-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02163.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
10
A preliminary study to develop an intervention to facilitate communication between couples in advanced cancer.一项旨在开发一种干预措施以促进晚期癌症患者夫妻间沟通的初步研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Oct;13(5):1381-90. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514001333. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing uncertainty: A grounded theory study of restoring normality in young and middle-aged patients with lymphoma.应对不确定性:一项关于恢复年轻及中年淋巴瘤患者正常生活状态的扎根理论研究
Int J Nurs Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.06.008. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer based on the couple's adaptation to cancer intimacy model: a directed content analysis.基于夫妻对癌症亲密关系模型的适应,理解胃癌化疗期间患者与配偶的沟通体验:一项定向内容分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 14;33(7):578. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09516-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Self-management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: Results of a randomized pilot trial.头颈部癌症患者夫妻的自我管理干预:一项随机试点试验的结果。
Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;125(7):1176-1184. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31906. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
2
Couple-based communication interventions for cancer: moving beyond a 'one size fits all' approach.针对癌症的基于夫妻关系的沟通干预:超越“一刀切”的方法。
Acta Oncol. 2018 May;57(5):693-695. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1400687. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couples communication intervention for advanced GI cancer.
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of the Taking Care of Us Intervention for Couples Living With Heart Failure.
心力衰竭患者伴侣“关爱我们”干预措施的可行性、可接受性及初步疗效
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 7;9(1):igae106. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae106. eCollection 2025.
4
Effects of dyadic interventions on psychological outcomes among cancer patients with active and non-active treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.二元干预对接受积极治疗和非积极治疗的癌症患者心理结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Oct 1. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01675-3.
5
Interventions to Reduce Psychosocial Burden in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review.干预措施以减轻头颈部癌症患者的心理社会负担:叙事性综述。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241251701. doi: 10.1177/19160216241251701.
6
The Effect of Group Counselling based on Constructive Couple Communication on Perceived Spousal Support in Uterine and Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Control Trial.基于建设性夫妻沟通的团体辅导对子宫颈癌幸存者感知配偶支持的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2024 Jul 1;12(3):162-174. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2024.101425.2420. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Development of a marital self-disclosure programme for alleviating the fear of cancer recurrence in patients with gastric cancer and undergoing chemotherapy: a modified Delphi method.开发一项婚姻自我表露计划以减轻胃癌化疗患者对癌症复发的恐惧:一种改良的德尔菲法
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 8;15:1340915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340915. eCollection 2024.
8
Development of a Community-Based Communication Intervention among Latin Caregivers of Patients Coping with Cancer.针对癌症患者拉丁裔照料者开展基于社区的沟通干预措施
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;12(8):841. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080841.
9
Evaluating the Dyadic Benefits of Early-Phase Behavioral Interventions: An Exemplar Using Data From Couples Living With Parkinson's Disease.评估早期行为干预的双重获益:以帕金森病患者夫妻为例的研究数据。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jul 1;64(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad172.
10
Effects of marital self-disclosure on marital relationship and psychological outcome for cancer patients: a systematic review.婚姻自我表露对癌症患者婚姻关系和心理结局的影响:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 30;31(6):361. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07826-z.
一项针对晚期胃肠道癌症患者的视频会议夫妻沟通干预随机试点试验。
Psychooncology. 2017 Jul;26(7):1027-1035. doi: 10.1002/pon.4121. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Natural language use and couples' adjustment to head and neck cancer.自然语言的运用与夫妻对头颈部癌症的适应情况。
Health Psychol. 2016 Oct;35(10):1069-80. doi: 10.1037/hea0000377. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples.患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁、焦虑和愤怒量表在不同临床样本中的临床效度
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.036. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Communication avoidance, coping and psychological distress of women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性的沟通回避、应对方式与心理困扰
J Behav Med. 2015 Jun;38(3):565-77. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9636-3. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Psychological distress in patients and caregivers over the course of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.头颈癌患者及其照护者在放射治疗过程中的心理困扰
Oral Oncol. 2014 Oct;50(10):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
8
Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancer and their partners.新诊断的头颈癌患者及其伴侣的创伤后应激障碍症状
Head Neck. 2015 Sep;37(9):1282-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.23760. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
9
Unsupportive partner behaviors, social-cognitive processing, and psychological outcomes in couples coping with early stage breast cancer.应对早期乳腺癌的夫妻中,伴侣不支持行为、社会认知加工与心理结果
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Apr;28(2):214-24. doi: 10.1037/a0036053. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer.系统评价和心理社会干预对夫妻应对癌症的元分析。
Psychooncology. 2013 Aug;22(8):1688-704. doi: 10.1002/pon.3200. Epub 2012 Oct 9.