Suppr超能文献

东亚三种主要传统医学的异同:文献计量分析

Similar but Different Three Major Traditional Medicines in East Asia: A Bibliometric Analysis.

作者信息

Kwon Chan-Young

机构信息

Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, Dong-Eui University College of Korean Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Chin J Integr Med. 2025 Apr;31(4):372-378. doi: 10.1007/s11655-025-4110-8. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Traditional medicine (TM) has played a key role in the health care system of East Asian countries, including China, Japan and South Korea. This bibliometric study analyzes the recent research status of these three TMs, including traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), traditional Korean medicine (TKM), and Kampo medicine (KM).

METHODS

Research topics of studies published for recent 10 years (2014 to 2023), through a search on MEDLINE via PubMed, was analyzed. Medical Subject Headings were used to distinguish between the three TMs researches. Bibliographic information was analyzed through VOSViewer version. Total 10,151 documents were included: TCM studies (n=9,630); TKM studies (n=256); and KM studies (n=295).

RESULTS

Comparing the three co-occurrence analysis maps, TCM studies generally overwhelm the quantitative scale of TKM and KM studies. In the trend of the latest research of TCM, not only corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but also clinical research topics such as gastrointestinal microbiome and diabetes mellitus have emerged, with in silico research approaches being actively applied. In the case of TKM, obesity and cooperative treatment with Western medicine are gaining attention. In KM, COVID-19 and Scutellaria baicalensis were recent research focuses. Unique features that distinguished from the other two TM research trends included 'gut microbiota', 'diabetes mellitus', 'clinical trials', 'disease models', and 'quality control' in the TCM map; 'prospective studies', 'cell line, tumor', and 'panax' in the TKM map; and 'aged, 80 and over', 'retrospective studies', 'glycyrrhiza', 'panax', and 'paeonia' in the KM map. Also, some quantitative and qualitative differences were found in author co-operation maps in each TM.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis revealed that there were clear quantitative and qualitative differences among TCM, TKM, and KM. Although these medicines have a common root, they may have become distinct due to factors such as the size of research funds, cultural differences, and the medical licensing system.

摘要

目的

传统医学在包括中国、日本和韩国在内的东亚国家的医疗保健系统中发挥了关键作用。本文献计量研究分析了这三种传统医学,即中医(TCM)、韩医(TKM)和汉方医学(KM)的近期研究现状。

方法

通过在PubMed上检索MEDLINE,分析了近10年(2014年至2023年)发表的研究的主题。使用医学主题词来区分这三种传统医学的研究。通过VOSViewer版本分析文献信息。共纳入10151篇文献:中医研究(n = 9630);韩医研究(n = 256);汉方医学研究(n = 295)。

结果

比较三张共现分析图,中医研究在数量规模上普遍超过韩医和汉方医学研究。在中医的最新研究趋势中,不仅出现了2019冠状病毒病(COVID - 19),还出现了诸如胃肠道微生物群和糖尿病等临床研究主题,且计算机模拟研究方法得到了积极应用。在韩医方面,肥胖症以及与西医的联合治疗受到关注。在汉方医学中,COVID - 19和黄芩是近期的研究重点。与其他两种传统医学研究趋势不同的独特特征包括:中医图中的“肠道微生物群”“糖尿病”“临床试验”“疾病模型”和“质量控制”;韩医图中的“前瞻性研究”“细胞系,肿瘤”和“人参”;汉方医学图中的“80岁及以上老年人”“回顾性研究”“甘草”“人参”和“芍药”。此外,在每种传统医学的作者合作图中也发现了一些数量和质量上的差异。

结论

该分析表明,中医、韩医和汉方医学之间存在明显的数量和质量差异。尽管这些医学有着共同的根源,但可能由于研究资金规模、文化差异和医疗许可制度等因素而变得有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验