• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑血流与组织学分析用于胶质母细胞瘤中浸润性肿瘤与血管源性水肿的准确鉴别

Cerebral blood flow and histological analysis for the accurate differentiation of infiltrating tumor and vasogenic edema in glioblastoma.

作者信息

Kuroda Hideki, Okita Yoshiko, Arisawa Atsuko, Utsugi Reina, Murakami Koki, Hirayama Ryuichi, Kijima Noriyuki, Arita Hideyuki, Kinoshita Manabu, Fujimoto Yasunori, Nakamura Hajime, Kagawa Naoki, Tomiyama Noriyuki, Kishima Haruhiko

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0316168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316168. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316168
PMID:39792964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11723604/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is characterized by neovascularization and diffuse infiltration into the adjacent tissue. T2*-based dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion images provide useful measurements of the biomarkers associated with tumor perfusion. This study aimed to distinguish infiltrating tumors from vasogenic edema in glioblastomas using DSC-MR perfusion images.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from 48 patients with primary IDH-wild-type glioblastoma and 24 patients with meningiomas (Edemas-M). First, we attempted histological verification of cell density, Ki-67 index, and microvessel areas to distinguish between non-contrast-enhancing tumors (NETs) and edema (Edemas) which were obtained from stereotactically fused T2-weighted and perfusion images. This was performed for evaluating enhancing tumors (ETs), NETs, and Edemas. Second, we also performed radiological verification to distinguish NETs from Edemas. Two neurosurgeons manually assigned the regions of interests (ROIs) to ETs, NETs, and Edemas. The DSC-MR perfusion imaging-derived parameters calculated for each ROI included the cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and mean transit time (MTT).

RESULTS

Cell density and microvessel area were significantly higher in NETs than those in Edemas (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). Regarding radiological analysis, the mean CBF ratio for Edemas was significantly lower than that for NETs (p<0.01). The mean MTT ratio for Edemas was significantly higher than that for NETs. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that CBF (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.890) could effectively distinguish between NETs and Edemas. The ROC analysis also showed that MTT (AUC = 0.946) could effectively distinguish between NETs and Edemas.

CONCLUSIONS

DSC-MR perfusion images may prove useful in differentiating NETs from Edemas in non-contrast T2 hyperintensity regions of glioblastoma.

摘要

背景

胶质母细胞瘤的特征是新生血管形成以及向邻近组织的弥漫性浸润。基于T2*的动态磁敏感对比(DSC)磁共振灌注成像可对与肿瘤灌注相关的生物标志物进行有用的测量。本研究旨在利用DSC磁共振灌注成像区分胶质母细胞瘤中的浸润性肿瘤与血管源性水肿。

方法

回顾性收集48例原发性异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)野生型胶质母细胞瘤患者和24例脑膜瘤患者(水肿-M)的数据。首先,我们尝试对细胞密度、Ki-67指数和微血管面积进行组织学验证,以区分从立体定向融合的T2加权和灌注图像中获得的非强化肿瘤(NETs)和水肿(Edemas)。这是为了评估强化肿瘤(ETs)、NETs和Edemas。其次,我们还进行了影像学验证以区分NETs和Edemas。两名神经外科医生手动将感兴趣区域(ROIs)指定给ETs、NETs和Edemas。为每个ROI计算的DSC磁共振灌注成像衍生参数包括脑血容量(CBV)、脑血流量(CBF)和平均通过时间(MTT)。

结果

NETs中的细胞密度和微血管面积显著高于Edemas(分别为p<0.01和p<0.05)。关于影像学分析,Edemas的平均CBF比值显著低于NETs(p<0.01)。Edemas的平均MTT比值显著高于NETs。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析表明,CBF(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.890)可有效区分NETs和Edemas。ROC分析还表明,MTT(AUC=0.946)可有效区分NETs和Edemas。

结论

DSC磁共振灌注成像可能有助于在胶质母细胞瘤的非强化T2高信号区域区分NETs和Edemas。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/46b2a7608cdd/pone.0316168.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/9b56c87b24a8/pone.0316168.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/6e640d5834ae/pone.0316168.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/c0be61da3abf/pone.0316168.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/bdb716fc6645/pone.0316168.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/b1aec59da465/pone.0316168.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/6093dd8e1f1d/pone.0316168.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/a1cd25fd49d0/pone.0316168.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/8489044099a6/pone.0316168.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/24326341ee03/pone.0316168.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/46b2a7608cdd/pone.0316168.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/9b56c87b24a8/pone.0316168.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/6e640d5834ae/pone.0316168.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/c0be61da3abf/pone.0316168.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/bdb716fc6645/pone.0316168.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/b1aec59da465/pone.0316168.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/6093dd8e1f1d/pone.0316168.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/a1cd25fd49d0/pone.0316168.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/8489044099a6/pone.0316168.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/24326341ee03/pone.0316168.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee10/11723604/46b2a7608cdd/pone.0316168.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebral blood flow and histological analysis for the accurate differentiation of infiltrating tumor and vasogenic edema in glioblastoma.脑血流与组织学分析用于胶质母细胞瘤中浸润性肿瘤与血管源性水肿的准确鉴别
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0316168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316168. eCollection 2025.
2
Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging and diffusion tensor imaging to facilitate distinction between infiltrating tumors and edemas in glioblastoma.神经突方向离散度与密度成像以及扩散张量成像有助于鉴别胶质母细胞瘤中的浸润性肿瘤与水肿。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jul;100:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
3
Clinical Value of Vascular Permeability Estimates Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI: Improved Diagnostic Performance in Distinguishing Hypervascular Primary CNS Lymphoma from Glioblastoma.动态磁敏感对比 MRI 评估血管通透性的临床价值:在鉴别高血运性原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤与胶质母细胞瘤方面提高诊断性能。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):1415-1422. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5732. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Permeability measurement using dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging enhances differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma.使用动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像进行渗透性测量可增强原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤与胶质母细胞瘤的鉴别诊断。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5539-5548. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06097-9. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
Prediction of pseudoprogression in post-treatment glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived oxygenation and microvascular transit time heterogeneity measures.使用动态磁敏感对比衍生的氧合和微血管转运时间异质性测量预测治疗后胶质母细胞瘤的假性进展。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):3061-3073. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10324-9. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
6
Utility of Percentage Signal Recovery and Baseline Signal in DSC-MRI Optimized for Relative CBV Measurement for Differentiating Glioblastoma, Lymphoma, Metastasis, and Meningioma.用于相对 CBV 测量的 DSC-MRI 的百分比信号恢复和基线信号的效用,可用于鉴别胶质母细胞瘤、淋巴瘤、转移瘤和脑膜瘤。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1445-1450. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6153. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.定量表观扩散系数在脑肿瘤及相关瘤周水肿特征描述中的应用
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jul;50(6):682-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850902933123.
8
Dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics to distinguish microcystic meningiomas from traditional Grade I meningiomas and high-grade gliomas.动态磁敏感对比和动态对比增强 MRI 特征有助于鉴别微囊型脑膜瘤与传统Ⅰ级脑膜瘤和高级别胶质瘤。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1220-1226. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.JNS14243. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
9
On differentiation between vasogenic edema and non-enhancing tumor in high-grade glioma patients using a support vector machine classifier based upon pre and post-surgery MRI images.基于术前和术后 MRI 图像的支持向量机分类器在高级别胶质瘤患者中对血管源性水肿和无强化肿瘤的鉴别。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Sep;106:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
10
Differentiation between vasogenic-edema versus tumor-infiltrative area in patients with glioblastoma during bevacizumab therapy: a longitudinal MRI study.贝伐单抗治疗期间胶质母细胞瘤患者血管源性水肿与肿瘤浸润区域的鉴别:一项纵向MRI研究
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jul;83(7):1250-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting glioblastoma recurrence using multiparametric MR imaging of non-enhancing peritumoral regions at baseline.利用基线时肿瘤周围非强化区域的多参数磁共振成像预测胶质母细胞瘤复发
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 26;10(9):e30411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30411. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
The use of MR perfusion parameters in differentiation between glioblastoma recurrence and radiation necrosis.磁共振灌注参数在鉴别胶质母细胞瘤复发与放射性坏死中的应用。
Folia Neuropathol. 2023;61(4):371-378. doi: 10.5114/fn.2023.134180.
3
Quantification of Radiomics features of Peritumoral Vasogenic Edema extracted from fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images in glioblastoma and isolated brain metastasis, using T1-dynamic contrast-enhanced Perfusion analysis.
利用T1动态对比增强灌注分析,对胶质母细胞瘤和孤立性脑转移瘤中从液体衰减反转恢复图像提取的瘤周血管源性水肿的影像组学特征进行量化。
NMR Biomed. 2023 May;36(5):e4884. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4884. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry for Tumor Cell Density Imaging for Glioma: An Exploratory Study via C-Methionine PET and Its Validation via Stereotactic Tissue Sampling.用于胶质瘤肿瘤细胞密度成像的磁共振弛豫测量法:通过碳-蛋氨酸PET进行的探索性研究及其通过立体定向组织采样的验证
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 12;13(16):4067. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164067.
5
Visualizing cellularity and angiogenesis in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma with diffusion and perfusion MRI and FET-PET imaging.利用扩散加权磁共振成像、灌注磁共振成像及FET正电子发射断层显像技术观察新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的细胞密度及血管生成情况
EJNMMI Res. 2021 Aug 16;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13550-021-00817-3.
6
Physiological MRI Biomarkers in the Differentiation Between Glioblastomas and Solitary Brain Metastases.生理学 MRI 生物标志物在鉴别胶质母细胞瘤和单发脑转移瘤中的作用。
Mol Imaging Biol. 2021 Oct;23(5):787-795. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01604-1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of supratotal versus gross total resection for glioblastoma.系统评价和荟萃分析显示,对于胶质母细胞瘤而言,次全切除与大体全切除的效果相当。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jul;148(3):419-431. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03556-y. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
8
The wavelet power spectrum of perfusion weighted MRI correlates with tumor vascularity in biopsy-proven glioblastoma samples.灌注加权磁共振成像的小波功率谱与活检证实的胶质母细胞瘤样本中的肿瘤血管生成相关。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 23;15(1):e0228030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228030. eCollection 2020.
9
Supramaximal resection: A systematic review of its safety, efficacy and feasibility in glioblastoma.超最大切除:胶质母细胞瘤中安全性、有效性和可行性的系统评价。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Feb;72:328-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.021. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
10
Vascular architecture mapping for early detection of glioblastoma recurrence.血管结构图谱用于胶质母细胞瘤复发的早期检测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Dec 1;47(6):E14. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19613.