Hanley Hans W A, Lu Yingdan, Pan Jennifer
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 7;122(1):e2420607122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2420607122. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
There is a widespread perception that China's digital censorship distances its people from the global internet, and the Chinese Communist Party, through state-controlled media, is the main gatekeeper of information about foreign affairs. Our analysis of narratives about the Russo-Ukrainian War circulating on the Chinese social media platform Weibo challenges this view. Comparing narratives on Weibo with 8.26 million unique news articles from 2,500 of some of the most trafficked websites in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the United States (totaling 10,000 sites), we find that Russian news websites published more articles matching narratives found on Weibo than news websites from China, Ukraine, or the United States. Similarly, a plurality of Weibo narratives were most associated with narratives found on Russian news websites while less than ten percent were most associated with narratives from Chinese news sites. Narratives later appearing on Weibo were more likely to first appear on Russian rather than Chinese, Ukrainian, or US news websites, and Russian websites were highly influential for narratives appearing on Weibo. Altogether, these results show that Chinese state media was not the main gatekeeper of information about Russia's invasion of Ukraine for Weibo users.
有一种普遍的看法认为,中国的数字审查使民众与全球互联网隔绝,而中国共产党通过国家控制的媒体,是外交事务信息的主要把关者。我们对中国社交媒体平台微博上流传的有关俄乌战争的叙事进行的分析对这一观点提出了挑战。将微博上的叙事与来自中国、俄罗斯、乌克兰和美国(总计1万个网站)2500个流量最大的网站中的826万篇独特新闻文章进行比较,我们发现俄罗斯新闻网站发表的与微博上发现的叙事相匹配的文章比来自中国、乌克兰或美国的新闻网站更多。同样,微博上的多数叙事与俄罗斯新闻网站上发现的叙事关联最大,而与中国新闻网站叙事关联最大的不到10%。后来出现在微博上的叙事更有可能首先出现在俄罗斯而非中国、乌克兰或美国的新闻网站上,并且俄罗斯网站对出现在微博上的叙事具有很大影响力。总体而言,这些结果表明,中国官方媒体并非微博用户获取有关俄罗斯入侵乌克兰信息的主要把关者。