Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 1;15(1):8127. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52179-8.
Despite the global presence of social media platforms, the reasons why people like and share content are still poorly understood. We investigate how group identity mentions and expressions of ingroup solidarity and outgroup hostility in posts correlate with engagement on Ukrainian social media (i.e., shares, likes, and other reactions) before and after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. We use a dataset of 1.6 million posts from Ukrainian news source pages on Facebook and Twitter (currently X) and a geolocated sample of 149 thousand Ukrainian tweets. Before the 2022 Russian invasion, we observe that outgroup mentions in posts from news source pages are generally more strongly associated with engagement than negative, positive, and moral-emotional language. After the invasion, social identity mentions become less strongly associated with engagement. Moreover, post-invasion ingroup solidarity posts are strongly related to engagement, whereas posts expressing outgroup hostility show smaller associations. This is the case for both news and non-news social media data. Our correlational results suggest that signaling solidarity with one's ingroup online is associated with more engagement than negativity about outgroups during intense periods of intergroup conflicts, at least in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war.
尽管社交媒体平台在全球范围内存在,但人们喜欢和分享内容的原因仍未得到很好的理解。我们研究了在 2022 年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰前后,帖子中提到群体身份以及表达内群体团结和外群体敌意的言论如何与乌克兰社交媒体(即分享、点赞和其他反应)的参与度相关。我们使用了来自 Facebook 和 Twitter(现为 X)上的乌克兰新闻源页面的 160 万条帖子和一个 14.9 万条乌克兰推文的地理位置样本数据集。在 2022 年俄罗斯入侵之前,我们观察到新闻源页面上的帖子中外群体的提及通常与参与度的相关性比负面、正面和道德情感语言更强。入侵后,社会身份的提及与参与度的相关性降低。此外,内群体团结的帖子在入侵后与参与度的相关性更强,而表达外群体敌意的帖子则显示出较小的相关性。无论是新闻还是非新闻社交媒体数据,情况都是如此。我们的相关结果表明,在群体间冲突激烈时期,在网上表达与自己群体的团结比对外群体的负面情绪更能与更多的参与度相关,至少在俄乌战争的背景下是这样。