• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与一期腹部缝合相比,负压封闭引流显著降低继发性腹膜炎患者的外科术后并发症:一项比较性回顾性研究。

Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Rajabaleyan Pooya, Vang Ask, Möller Sören, Khalaf Sardar, Ladegaard Anna Gosvig, Qvist Niels, Ellebæk Mark Bremholm

机构信息

Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Open Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):387-400. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12472. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1002/wjs.12472
PMID:39794299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11798683/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vacuum-assisted abdominal closure (VAC) is being increasingly used as an adjunctive procedure in the surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis. This study compared postoperative mortality and complication rates between VAC and primary abdominal closure (PAC).

METHOD

This retrospective chart review included all patients diagnosed with secondary peritonitis who underwent laparotomy between 2010 and 2019. Data were collected from six hospitals within Southern Denmark, covering a population of approximately 1,225,000 inhabitants.

RESULTS

The study involved 315 patients (139 in the PAC and 176 in the VAC groups). In the VAC group, BMI, ASA, SOFA, MPI, and four quadrant contamination was significantly higher at the index operation. There were no significant differences in nonadjusted and adjusted postoperative mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, with cumulative values of 13%, 16%, and 21%, respectively, compared with 16%, 21%, and 31%, in the PAC group (p = 0.519, p = 0.380, and p = 0.051, respectively). Cumulative adjusted surgical postoperative complications at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, as assessed by the comprehensive complication index, was significantly higher in the PAC group. Reoperations were significantly more common in the PAC group. The total length of the intensive care unit admission was significantly longer in the VAC group, with a mean of 9.0 ± 12.1 versus 6.7 ± 12.1 days (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VAC after laparotomy for secondary peritonitis did not significantly reduce mortality but increased ICU stay, whereas primary closure led to higher surgical complication rates and reoperations.

摘要

背景

负压辅助腹部闭合术(VAC)越来越多地被用作继发性腹膜炎外科治疗的辅助手段。本研究比较了VAC和一期腹部闭合术(PAC)的术后死亡率和并发症发生率。

方法

这项回顾性图表审查纳入了2010年至2019年间所有诊断为继发性腹膜炎并接受剖腹手术的患者。数据收集自丹麦南部的六家医院,覆盖人口约122.5万。

结果

该研究纳入了315例患者(PAC组139例,VAC组176例)。在VAC组中,初次手术时的体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会分级、序贯器官衰竭评估、改良胰腺炎严重程度指数以及四个象限污染情况均显著更高。30天、90天和1年时,未调整和调整后的术后死亡率无显著差异,VAC组的累积值分别为13%、16%和21%,而PAC组分别为16%、21%和31%(p分别为0.519、0.380和0.051)。根据综合并发症指数评估,PAC组在30天、90天和1年时累积调整后的手术术后并发症显著更高。再次手术在PAC组中更为常见。VAC组重症监护病房住院总时长显著更长,平均为9.0±12.1天,而PAC组为6.7±12.1天(p<0.001)。

结论

继发性腹膜炎剖腹手术后采用VAC并未显著降低死亡率,但增加了重症监护病房停留时间,而一期闭合术导致更高的手术并发症发生率和再次手术率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb20/11798683/54f4f6792a2b/WJS-49-387-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb20/11798683/885e392c6912/WJS-49-387-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb20/11798683/54f4f6792a2b/WJS-49-387-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb20/11798683/885e392c6912/WJS-49-387-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb20/11798683/54f4f6792a2b/WJS-49-387-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.与一期腹部缝合相比,负压封闭引流显著降低继发性腹膜炎患者的外科术后并发症:一项比较性回顾性研究。
World J Surg. 2025 Feb;49(2):387-400. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12472. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.继发性腹膜炎患者采用真空辅助闭合术或按需再次剖腹手术进行一期闭合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 May 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00615-5.
3
Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) for postoperative secondary peritonitis: Effect on bacterial load as well as local and systemic cytokine response (initial results).负压封闭引流(VAC)治疗术后继发性腹膜炎:对细菌载量以及局部和全身细胞因子反应的影响(初步结果)
Pol Przegl Chir. 2018 Aug 6;90(5):27-35. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.1751.
4
High risk of fistula formation in vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis-a retrospective analysis.继发性腹膜炎所致开放性腹部患者行负压封闭引流治疗时发生瘘管形成的高风险——一项回顾性分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):619-25. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1443-y. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
Open abdomen and VAC® in severe diffuse peritonitis.开放性腹腔与VAC®在严重弥漫性腹膜炎中的应用
J R Army Med Corps. 2016 Feb;162(1):30-4. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2014-000386. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
Open abdomen with negative pressure device vs primary abdominal closure for the management of surgical abdominal sepsis: a retrospective review.使用负压装置的开放性腹腔与一期腹腔关闭治疗外科腹部感染:一项回顾性研究
Am J Surg. 2016 May;211(5):926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.负压封闭引流与按需再次剖腹术治疗继发性腹膜炎的比较(VACOR 试验):一项随机对照试验的方案。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 May 26;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.
8
Use of dynamic wound closure system in conjunction with vacuum-assisted closure therapy in delayed closure of open abdomen.在开放性腹部延迟关闭中联合使用动态伤口闭合系统和负压辅助闭合治疗。
Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1008-0. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
9
Open abdomen with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in patients with complicated diffuse secondary peritonitis: A single-center 8-year experience.复杂弥漫性继发性腹膜炎患者采用开放式腹腔联合负压封闭引流及补片介导的筋膜牵引术:单中心8年经验
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6):1100-1105. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001452.
10
Open abdomen versus primary closure in the management of severe abdominal sepsis: What is the right way? Results of the last 5 years of a reference center.严重腹部脓毒症治疗中开放腹腔与一期缝合:哪种方法正确?一家参考中心过去5年的结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 26;410(1):147. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03693-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Vacuum-assisted closure or primary closure with relaparotomy on-demand in patients with secondary peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.继发性腹膜炎患者采用真空辅助闭合术或按需再次剖腹手术进行一期闭合:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 May 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00615-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines.急诊普通外科中的源头控制:WSES、GAIS、SIS-E、SIS-A 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jul 21;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00509-4.
2
Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.负压封闭引流与按需再次剖腹术治疗继发性腹膜炎的比较(VACOR 试验):一项随机对照试验的方案。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 May 26;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.
3
The results of rapid source control laparotomy or open abdomen for acute diverticulitis.
急性憩室炎行快速原发病灶控制剖腹术或开放性腹部手术的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Feb;407(1):259-265. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02304-8. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Lessons Learned in 11 Years of Experience With Open Abdomen Treatment With Negative-Pressure Therapy for Various Abdominal Emergencies.负压治疗开放性腹腔应对各种腹部急症11年经验总结
Front Surg. 2021 Jun 4;8:632929. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.632929. eCollection 2021.
5
Predictive factors of mortality in open abdomen for abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study on 113 patients.开放性腹部治疗腹腔感染患者死亡率的预测因素:113 例回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1975-1982. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01012-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial on Damage Control Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis.穿孔性憩室炎合并弥漫性腹膜炎损伤控制手术的前瞻性随机对照试验
World J Surg. 2020 Dec;44(12):4098-4105. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05762-1. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.严重腹部脓毒症的开放性腹腔关闭方法:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1819-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Are the Benefits of Rapid Source Control Laparotomy Realized after Acute Colonic Perforation?急性结肠穿孔后能实现快速源头控制剖腹术的获益吗?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Oct;21(8):665-670. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.272. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
Outcomes of open abdomen versus primary closure following emergent laparotomy for suspected secondary peritonitis: A propensity-matched analysis.开放性腹部与原发性腹部闭合术在疑似继发性腹膜炎紧急剖腹手术后的结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):623-629. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002345.
10
Intraabdominal continuous negative pressure therapy for secondary peritonitis: an observational trial in a maximum care center.腹腔内持续负压治疗继发性腹膜炎:重症监护中心的观察性试验。
Acta Chir Belg. 2020 Jun;120(3):179-185. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2019.1576448. Epub 2019 Apr 5.