Schulz Felicitas, Roggenbuck Claudia, Kündgen Andrea, Kasprzak Annika, Nachtkamp Kathrin, Jäger Paul, Dietrich Sascha, Kobbe Guido, Germing Ulrich, Neumann Frank
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Ann Hematol. 2025 Jan;104(1):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06196-2. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
As median age of patients with acute myeloid leukemia is 72 years, older patients continue to be a vulnerable cohort representing significant challenges in clinical practice. Patient-specific comorbidities as well as leukemia-specific unfavorable molecular- and cytogenetics confer even poorer outcomes. Treatment of AML therefore needs to be less toxic to prevent harm while lowering or eradicating leukemic burden to prolong survival. In this retrospective analysis we included 365 older AML patients from the Düsseldorf registry who were diagnosed and treated in our department of hematology over a period of 31 years. Most patients were treated with HMA (37.3%) followed by 35.3% of patients who received either low dose chemotherapy or BSC. 9% of patients were treated with induction chemotherapy while 8.5% of patients received a combination of HMA with venetoclax. 4.1% of patients underwent allografting. At the time of last follow up, 35 patients (9.6%) were still alive. Of those patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy or HMA + venetoclax, 18.2% and 29.0% were still alive, whereas 60% of the patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation were still alive (p < 0.001). Median overall survival of the entire patient population was 6 months. Longest survival was observed in patients who underwent aHSCT with an unreached median overall survival followed by patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy (21 months) or HMA plus venetoclax (11 months). The implementation of HMA + venetoclax and increasing numbers of aHSCT improved prognosis and survival even in older AML patients.
由于急性髓系白血病患者的中位年龄为72岁,老年患者仍然是一个脆弱的群体,在临床实践中面临重大挑战。患者特有的合并症以及白血病特有的不良分子和细胞遗传学特征导致预后更差。因此,急性髓系白血病的治疗需要降低毒性以避免伤害,同时降低或消除白血病负担以延长生存期。在这项回顾性分析中,我们纳入了来自杜塞尔多夫登记处的365例老年急性髓系白血病患者,他们在我们血液科接受了31年的诊断和治疗。大多数患者接受了HMA治疗(37.3%),其次是35.3%接受低剂量化疗或最佳支持治疗的患者。9%的患者接受了诱导化疗,而8.5%的患者接受了HMA与维奈克拉联合治疗。4.1%的患者接受了同种异体移植。在最后一次随访时,35例患者(9.6%)仍然存活。在接受诱导化疗或HMA+维奈克拉治疗的患者中,分别有18.2%和29.0%仍然存活,而接受异基因干细胞移植的患者中有60%仍然存活(p<0.001)。整个患者群体的中位总生存期为6个月。接受自体造血干细胞移植的患者观察到最长生存期,中位总生存期未达到,其次是接受诱导化疗(21个月)或HMA加维奈克拉(11个月)治疗的患者。即使在老年急性髓系白血病患者中,HMA+维奈克拉的应用和自体造血干细胞移植数量的增加也改善了预后和生存期。