Brennan Paul N, MacMillan Mark, Manship Thomas, Moroni Francesca, Glover Alison, Troland Debbie, MacPherson Iain, Graham Catriona, Aird Rhona, Semple Scott I K, Morris David M, Fraser Alasdair R, Pass Chloe, McGowan Neil W A, Turner Marc L, Manson Lynn, Lachlan Neil J, Dillon John F, Kilpatrick Alastair M, Campbell John D M, Fallowfield Jonathan A, Forbes Stuart J
Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nat Med. 2025 Mar;31(3):979-987. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03406-8. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality; however, there are no approved therapies except orthotopic liver transplantation. Preclinical studies showed that bone-marrow-derived macrophage injections reduce inflammation, resolve fibrosis and stimulate liver regeneration. In a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 randomized controlled trial ( ISRCTN10368050 ) in n = 51 adult patients with compensated cirrhosis and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥10 and ≤17, we evaluated the efficacy of autologous monocyte-derived macrophage therapy (n = 27) compared to standard medical care (n = 24). The primary endpoint was the difference in baseline to day 90 change in MELD score (ΔMELD) between treatment and control groups (ΔΔMELD). Secondary endpoints included adverse clinical outcomes, non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 90 d, 180 d and 360 d. The ΔΔMELD between day 0 and day 90 in the treatment group compared to controls was -0.87 (95% confidence interval: -1.79, 0.0; P = 0.06); therefore, the primary endpoint was not met. During 360-d follow-up, five of 24 participants in the control group developed a total of 10 severe adverse events, four of which were liver related, and three deaths (two liver related), whereas no liver-related severe adverse events or deaths occurred in the treatment group. Although no differences were observed in biomarkers or HRQoL, exploratory analysis showed anti-inflammatory serum cytokine profiles after macrophage infusion. This study reinforces the safety and potential efficacy of macrophage therapy in cirrhosis, supporting further investigation.
肝硬化是发病和死亡的主要原因;然而,除了原位肝移植外,尚无获批的治疗方法。临床前研究表明,注射骨髓来源的巨噬细胞可减轻炎症、消除纤维化并刺激肝脏再生。在一项针对n = 51例代偿期肝硬化成年患者、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分≥10且≤17的多中心、开放标签、平行组、2期随机对照试验(ISRCTN10368050)中,我们评估了自体单核细胞衍生巨噬细胞疗法(n = 27)与标准药物治疗(n = 24)相比的疗效。主要终点是治疗组和对照组之间基线至第90天MELD评分变化(ΔMELD)的差异(ΔΔMELD)。次要终点包括90天、180天和360天时的不良临床结局、非侵入性纤维化生物标志物以及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。与对照组相比,治疗组第0天和第90天之间的ΔΔMELD为-0.87(95%置信区间:-1.79,0.0;P = 0.06);因此,未达到主要终点。在360天的随访期间,对照组的24名参与者中有5人共发生了10起严重不良事件,其中4起与肝脏相关,3人死亡(2人与肝脏相关),而治疗组未发生与肝脏相关的严重不良事件或死亡。尽管在生物标志物或HRQoL方面未观察到差异,但探索性分析显示巨噬细胞输注后血清细胞因子具有抗炎谱。这项研究强化了巨噬细胞疗法在肝硬化中的安全性和潜在疗效,支持进一步研究。