Kimera Emmanuel, Alanyo Linda Grace, Pauline Irumba, Andinda Maureen, Mirembe Enos Masereka
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Mountains of the Moon University, Fort Portal, Uganda.
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Mountains of the Moon University, Fort Portal, Uganda.
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 10;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02751-6.
HIV-related stigma remains a key barrier to the attainment of the UNAIDS global goal of ending AIDS by 2030. Due to the social and contextual nature of HIV-related stigma, community-based interventions may be more effective in addressing it. In this review, we synthesized evidence on the effectiveness and features of community-based interventions against HIV-related stigma in Sub-Saharan Africa.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych INFO, and Web of Science were searched in July 2023. We also searched Google Scholar and reference lists of all selected studies. Included studies were randomized controlled trials, mixed methods studies, as well as pre-test and post-test studies that evaluated the effectiveness of a community-based intervention to reduce HIV-related stigma in the general population or among specific groups. Data extraction was done using a pre-designed and pre-tested form. We performed a synthesis without meta-analysis, utilizing Fisher's method to combine p-values, to demonstrate evidence of an effect in at least one study. Additionally, we applied framework thematic analysis to qualitatively synthesize the intervention characteristics of the included studies.
A total of nine journal articles were included, largely with a high risk of bias. Results from the combined p-values provide strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of community-based interventions in reducing HIV-related stigma in at least one of the studies (p < 0.001, X = 73.1, 18 degrees of freedom). Most studies involved people living with HIV (PLH) alone as intervention recipients and as intervention implementers. Community members with unknown HIV status were involved in only 2 studies. The intervention strategies were largely information sharing through workshops and training as well as individualized counselling. In few studies, additional support in the form of referrals, nutritional supplements, and adherence support was provided to PLH during the interventions. Most studies were judged to be of moderate to high cost except in 3 where the intervention implementers were PLH within the community, volunteering in the home-based support approach. The involvement of community members in the design of intervention strategies was not seen in all the studies.
Community-based interventions appear to be effective in reducing HIV-related stigma. However, more robust randomized trials are needed to provide stronger evidence for this effect. Although these interventions have been multifariously developed in Sub-Saharan Africa, comprehensive strategies involving the stigmatized and the "stigmatizers" in a social change approach are lacking. The application of strategies without the involvement of community members in their design takes away a sense of community responsibility, and this threatens the sustainability of such interventions.
PROSPERO CRD42023418818.
与艾滋病病毒相关的耻辱感仍然是实现联合国艾滋病规划署到2030年终结艾滋病的全球目标的关键障碍。由于与艾滋病病毒相关耻辱感的社会和背景性质,基于社区的干预措施在应对这一问题上可能更有效。在本综述中,我们综合了关于撒哈拉以南非洲基于社区的干预措施应对与艾滋病病毒相关耻辱感的有效性和特征的证据。
2023年7月检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Psych INFO和Web of Science。我们还检索了谷歌学术以及所有选定研究的参考文献列表。纳入的研究包括随机对照试验、混合方法研究以及评估基于社区的干预措施在普通人群或特定群体中减少与艾滋病病毒相关耻辱感有效性的前后测试研究。使用预先设计和预先测试的表格进行数据提取。我们在不进行荟萃分析的情况下进行了综合,利用费舍尔方法合并p值,以证明至少一项研究中有效果的证据。此外,我们应用框架主题分析对纳入研究的干预特征进行定性综合。
共纳入9篇期刊文章,大多存在较高的偏倚风险。合并p值的结果提供了有力证据,支持基于社区的干预措施在至少一项研究中减少与艾滋病病毒相关耻辱感的有效性(p < 0.001,X = 73.1,自由度为18)。大多数研究仅将艾滋病病毒感染者作为干预接受者和干预实施者。艾滋病病毒感染状况不明的社区成员仅参与了2项研究。干预策略主要是通过讲习班和培训进行信息共享以及个性化咨询。在少数研究中,干预期间向艾滋病病毒感染者提供了转诊、营养补充剂和依从性支持等额外支持。除了3项研究(其干预实施者是社区内的艾滋病病毒感染者,采用居家支持方式志愿服务)外,大多数研究被判定成本为中度到高度。并非所有研究都可见社区成员参与干预策略的设计。
基于社区的干预措施似乎在减少与艾滋病病毒相关的耻辱感方面有效。然而,需要更有力的随机试验来为这种效果提供更有力的证据。尽管这些干预措施在撒哈拉以南非洲已经有多种发展,但缺乏以社会变革方法让受耻辱者和“施加耻辱者”都参与的综合策略。在设计中没有社区成员参与的策略应用会消除社区责任感,这威胁到此类干预措施的可持续性。
PROSPERO CRD42023418818