Zhang Chao, Zhang Ru, Qi Yuanyuan, Wen Xin, Sun Jinpeng, Xiao Peng
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Advanced Medical Research Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 28;26(1):167. doi: 10.3390/ijms26010167.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play essential roles in numerous physiological processes and are key targets for drug development. Among them, adhesion GPCRs (aGPCRs) stand out for their unique domain structures and diverse functions. ADGRG2 is a member of the aGPCR family and is involved in the regulation of various systems in the human body, including reproductive, nervous, cardiovascular, and endocrine systems. Investigating ADGRG2 antagonists enhances our understanding of its regulatory roles in diverse physiological processes, yet their precise mechanisms of action remain unclear. To address this, we investigated the antagonistic mechanism of ADGRG2 by examining its interactions with various antagonists, including short peptides (F601D, F601E) and small molecules (deoxycorticosterone, DOC). Using advanced metadynamics simulation, ligand binding assay and cAMP assay, we elucidated the binding modes of these antagonists. We identified five distinct F601D-ADGRG2 complex states, four F601E-ADGRG2 complex states, and three DOC-ADGRG2 complex states, which were each characterized by specific hydrogen bonds or polar interactions with their respective ligands. Although the ADGRG2 binding pocket consists of both polar and hydrophobic residues, our biochemical experiments revealed that mutations in polar amino acids significantly reduce the efficacy of the antagonists. Our results show that F601D, F601E, and DOC induce the formation of Y758-N775-N860 polar networks within ADGRG2, effectively stabilizing its inactive state. Additionally, we compared the active and inactive states of ADGRG2, highlighting the structural changes induced by antagonist-stabilized polar networks and their impact on receptor conformation. These findings provide important insights into the biology of aGPCRs and provide theoretical support for the rational design of therapeutic drugs targeting ADGRG2.
G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)在众多生理过程中发挥着重要作用,是药物研发的关键靶点。其中,粘附GPCRs(aGPCRs)因其独特的结构域结构和多样的功能而备受关注。ADGRG2是aGPCR家族的成员,参与人体多种系统的调节,包括生殖、神经、心血管和内分泌系统。研究ADGRG2拮抗剂有助于我们更好地理解其在各种生理过程中的调节作用,但其确切的作用机制仍不清楚。为了解决这一问题,我们通过研究ADGRG2与各种拮抗剂的相互作用来探究其拮抗机制,这些拮抗剂包括短肽(F601D、F601E)和小分子(脱氧皮质酮,DOC)。利用先进的元动力学模拟、配体结合测定和cAMP测定,我们阐明了这些拮抗剂的结合模式。我们确定了五种不同的F601D-ADGRG2复合物状态、四种F601E-ADGRG2复合物状态和三种DOC-ADGRG2复合物状态,每种状态都以与各自配体的特定氢键或极性相互作用为特征。尽管ADGRG2结合口袋由极性和疏水残基组成,但我们的生化实验表明,极性氨基酸的突变会显著降低拮抗剂的效力。我们的结果表明,F601D、F601E和DOC诱导ADGRG2内形成Y758-N775-N860极性网络,有效稳定其非活性状态。此外,我们比较了ADGRG2的活性和非活性状态,突出了拮抗剂稳定的极性网络诱导的结构变化及其对受体构象的影响。这些发现为aGPCRs的生物学研究提供了重要见解,并为针对ADGRG2的治疗药物的合理设计提供了理论支持。