Suppr超能文献

炎症指标与冠状动脉粥样硬化程度的关系(初步研究)

Relationship Between Inflammatory Readings and the Degree of Coronary Atherosclerosis (Pilot Study).

作者信息

Liuizė Abramavičiūtė Agnė, Mongirdienė Aušra, Laukaitienė Jolanta

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):122. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010122.

Abstract

Some calculated total blood count readings are investigated as novel additional readings to help with evaluation of personalized CAD patients' clinical management and prognosis. We aimed to investigate the association between readings such as NLR, MLR, PLR, NMR, LMR, MHR, SII, and SIRI and the severity of CAD in patients with SAP. This retrospective pilot study included 166 patients. All patients underwent CA or CCTA, or both, to assess severity of CAD. Patients were divided three ways: (1) according to presence ( = 146) or absence ( = 20) of CAD; (2) according to Gensini score; (3) according to the CAD-RADS score. : Patients with CAD had lower LMR, higher NLR, SIRI, MLR, and SII compared to patients without CAD < 0.001 and = 0.018, respectively for SII). According to the CAD severity by Gensini score, the NLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI values increase and LMR decreases gradually with severity of CAD ( < 0.001). A moderate correlation was found between SII ( = 0.511, < 0.001), NLR ( = 0.567, < 0.001), and SIRI ( = 0.474, < 0.001) and severity of CAD according to Gensini score. MLR and LMR had a low corelation with severity of CAD according to Gensini score ( = 0.356, < 0.001; = -0.355, < 0.001, respectively). The CAD-RADS score weakly correlated with NLR and MHR = 0.365, < 0.001; = 0.346, < 0.001, respectively), and moderately with LMR, MLR, and SIRI ( = -0.454, < 0.001; = 0.455, < 0.001; = 0.522, < 0.001, respectively). NLR, LMR, and SIRI appear to be potential predictors of chronic inflammation, and SIRI is the best predictor of the degree of atherosclerosis of all the other assessed blood parameters.

摘要

一些计算得出的全血细胞计数读数被作为新的附加读数进行研究,以帮助评估个性化冠心病患者的临床管理和预后。我们旨在研究中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、中性粒细胞与单核细胞比值(NMR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(MHR)、全身炎症反应指数(SII)和全身炎症反应与胰岛素抵抗比值(SIRI)等读数与急性胰腺炎(SAP)患者冠心病严重程度之间的关联。这项回顾性初步研究纳入了166例患者。所有患者均接受冠状动脉造影(CA)或冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA),或两者都接受,以评估冠心病的严重程度。患者按三种方式分组:(1)根据是否存在冠心病(冠心病组=146例,无冠心病组=20例);(2)根据Gensini评分;(3)根据冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统(CAD-RADS)评分。结果显示:与无冠心病患者相比,冠心病患者的LMR较低,NLR、SIRI、MLR和SII较高(SII的P<0.001,其他分别为P=0.018)。根据Gensini评分的冠心病严重程度,随着冠心病严重程度增加,NLR、MLR、SII和SIRI值升高,LMR逐渐降低(P<0.001)。根据Gensini评分,发现SII(r=0.511,P<0.001)、NLR(r=0.567,P<0.001)和SIRI(r=0.474,P<0.001)与冠心病严重程度之间存在中度相关性。根据Gensini评分,MLR和LMR与冠心病严重程度的相关性较低(分别为r=0.356,P<0.001;r=-0.355,P<0.001)。CAD-RADS评分与NLR和MHR的相关性较弱(分别为r=0.365,P<0.001;r=0.346,P<0.001),与LMR、MLR和SIRI的相关性为中度(分别为r=-0.454,P<0.001;r=0.455,P<0.001;r=0.522,P<0.001)。NLR、LMR和SIRI似乎是慢性炎症的潜在预测指标,并且在所有其他评估的血液参数中,SIRI是动脉粥样硬化程度的最佳预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5550/11722419/7642393612b4/jcm-14-00122-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验