Aguado-Maestro Ignacio, Valle-López Sergio, Simón-Pérez Clarisa, Frutos-Reoyo Emilio-Javier, García-Cepeda Ignacio, de Blas-Sanz Inés, Sanz-Peñas Ana-Elena, Diez-Rodríguez Jesús, Mencía-González Juan-Pedro, Sanz-Posadas Carlos
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Río Hortega University Hospital, C Dulzaina 2, 47012 Valladolid, Spain.
Discipline of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Av Ramón y Cajal 7, 47007 Valladolid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 5;14(1):261. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010261.
: Hip fractures are prevalent among the elderly and impose a significant burden on healthcare systems due to the associated high morbidity and costs. The increasing use of intramedullary nails for hip fracture fixation has inadvertently introduced risks; these implants can alter bone elasticity and create stress concentrations, leading to peri-implant fractures. The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of peri-implant hip fractures, evaluate the potential causes of such fractures, determine the type of treatment provided, assess the outcomes of said treatments, and establish possible improvement strategies. : We conducted a retrospective observational study on 33 patients with peri-implant hip fractures (PIFs) who underwent surgical management at Río Hortega University Hospital from 2010 to 2022. The collected data included demographics, initial fracture characteristics, the peri-implant fracture classification, implant details, surgical outcomes, functional scores, and complications. Functional capacity was evaluated using the Parker Mobility Score (PMS). : The cohort (91% female, mean age 87.6 years) included 34 peri-implant fractures. The mean time from the initial fracture to the PIF was 47.2 months (nine patients developed PIFs within 2 months). Most fractures (76%) were managed with implant removal and the insertion of a long intramedullary nail, with cement augmentation in 31% of cases. The mean surgical time was 102 min, and the average hospital stay was 9.6 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 27%, with a perioperative mortality rate of 9%. Functional capacity showed a significant decline, with an average PMS loss of 4.16 points. Mortality at one year post-PIF was 36%, rising to 83% at five years. Radiographic consolidation was observed in 72% of cases at an average of 6.04 months, though 24% of patients died before consolidation. Statistically significant correlations were found for PMS pre-index fracture (PMS1: r = 0.354, < 0.05), pre-PIF (PMS2: r = 0.647, < 0.001), and post-PIF (PMS3: r = 0.604, < 0.001). : Peri-implant hip fractures present complex challenges due to their surgical difficulty and impact on patient mobility and survival. Successful management requires individualized treatment based on fracture type, implant positioning, and patient factors. These findings underscore the need for preventive measures, particularly in implant choice and techniques like overlapping and interlocking constructs, to minimize the secondary fracture risk.
髋部骨折在老年人中很常见,由于其高发病率和相关成本,给医疗系统带来了沉重负担。髓内钉在髋部骨折固定中的使用增加,无意中带来了风险;这些植入物会改变骨弹性并产生应力集中,导致植入物周围骨折。本研究的目的是调查植入物周围髋部骨折的结果,评估此类骨折的潜在原因,确定所提供的治疗类型,评估所述治疗的结果,并制定可能的改进策略。
我们对2010年至2022年在里奥奥尔特加大学医院接受手术治疗的33例植入物周围髋部骨折(PIF)患者进行了回顾性观察研究。收集的数据包括人口统计学、初始骨折特征、植入物周围骨折分类、植入物细节、手术结果、功能评分和并发症。使用帕克活动评分(PMS)评估功能能力。
该队列(91%为女性,平均年龄87.6岁)包括34例植入物周围骨折。从初始骨折到PIF的平均时间为47.2个月(9例患者在2个月内发生PIF)。大多数骨折(76%)通过取出植入物并插入长髓内钉进行处理,31%的病例采用骨水泥强化。平均手术时间为102分钟,平均住院时间为9.6天。术后并发症发生率为27%,围手术期死亡率为9%。功能能力显著下降,PMS平均损失4.16分。PIF后一年的死亡率为36%,五年时升至83%。平均6.04个月时,72%的病例观察到影像学骨愈合,尽管24%的患者在骨愈合前死亡。发现PMS与指数前骨折(PMS1:r = 0.354,P < 0.05)、PIF前(PMS2:r = 0.647,P < 0.001)和PIF后(PMS3:r = 0.604,P < 0.001)之间存在统计学显著相关性。
植入物周围髋部骨折由于其手术难度以及对患者活动能力和生存状况的影响,带来了复杂的挑战。成功的治疗需要根据骨折类型、植入物位置和患者因素进行个体化治疗。这些发现强调了采取预防措施的必要性,特别是在植入物选择以及重叠和锁定结构等技术方面,以尽量降低二次骨折风险。