Commentary on Sun and Tang: Measurement assessment and validity in problematic smartphone use.
作者信息
James Richard J E, Hitcham Lucy
机构信息
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
出版信息
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):642-644. doi: 10.1111/add.16764. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary on Sun and Tang: Measurement assessment and validity in problematic smartphone use.对孙和唐的评论：问题智能手机使用中的测量评估与效度
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):642-644. doi: 10.1111/add.16764. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
2
Psychometric evaluation and measurement invariance of the problematic smartphone use scale among college students: A national survey of 130 145 participants.大学生问题智能手机使用量表的心理测量学评估与测量不变性：对130145名参与者的全国性调查
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):629-641. doi: 10.1111/add.16699. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
3
Development and validation study of the Smartphone Overuse Screening Questionnaire.智能手机过度使用筛查问卷的编制与验证研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Nov;257:352-357. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.074. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale adapted to Spanish and French: Towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use.适用于西班牙语和法语的智能手机成瘾量表简版：迈向问题性手机使用的跨文化研究。
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
From everyday life to measurable problematic smartphone use: The development and validation of the Smartphone Use Problems Identification Questionnaire (SUPIQ).从日常生活到可衡量的问题性智能手机使用：智能手机使用问题识别问卷（SUPIQ）的编制与验证。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Apr 18;13(2):506-524. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00010. Print 2024 Jun 26.
6
Comparing generalized and specific problematic smartphone/internet use: Longitudinal relationships between smartphone application-based addiction and social media addiction and psychological distress.比较广义和狭义的智能手机/网络使用问题：基于智能手机应用的成瘾和社交媒体成瘾与心理困扰之间的纵向关系。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Jun 26;9(2):410-419. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00023. Print 2020 Jun.
7
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the problematic mobile phone use questionnaire-short version across gender in Chinese adolescents and young adults.青少年及青年群体中，简体中文版问题手机使用问卷短式版的跨性别因子结构和测量不变性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2449-0.
8
Do young people perceive their smartphone addiction as problematic? A study in Danish university college students.年轻人是否认为自己的智能手机成瘾是个问题？一项针对丹麦大学生的研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 25;9(10):e20368. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20368. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Validation of smartphone addiction scale - Short version (SAS-SV) in Brazilian adolescents.智能手机成瘾量表简版（SAS-SV）在巴西青少年中的效度验证。
Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;110:106540. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106540. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
10
The validity and reliability of Persian version of smartphone addiction questionnaire in Iran.智能手机成瘾问卷波斯文版在伊朗的有效性和可靠性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Sep 17;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00407-5.
本文引用的文献
1
Governments are banning kids from social media: will that protect them from harm?各国政府正在禁止儿童使用社交媒体：这能保护他们免受伤害吗？
Nature. 2024 Dec;636(8043):530-531. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-03955-5.
2
Psychometric evaluation and measurement invariance of the problematic smartphone use scale among college students: A national survey of 130 145 participants.大学生问题智能手机使用量表的心理测量学评估与测量不变性：对130145名参与者的全国性调查
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):629-641. doi: 10.1111/add.16699. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
3
Problematic Mobile Phone and Smartphone Use Scales: A Systematic Review.问题性手机和智能手机使用量表：一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2020 May 5;11:672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00672. eCollection 2020.
4
Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.改善结构方程模型中类别数据的适配指数。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 May-Jun;56(3):390-407. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1717922. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Is smartphone addiction really an addiction?智能手机成瘾是真的成瘾吗？
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):252-259. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.49. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents.智能手机成瘾量表：青少年版的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. eCollection 2013.
7
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量？在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
8
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转：探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
Zotero 插件