Patil Tanvi, Gregory Michael, Savona Natalie, Jarmukli Nabil, Leonard Charles E
Salem Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 1970 Roanoke Blvd, Salem, VA, 24153, USA.
Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Boulevard, Richmond, VA, 23249-4915, USA.
Clin Drug Investig. 2025 Feb;45(2):69-84. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01417-4. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
The REDUCE-IT randomized trial demonstrated a cardiovascular benefit of icosapent ethyl (IPE) but also raised potential safety signals for atrial fibrillation (AF) and serious bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the real-world safety of IPE versus mixed omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (OM-3) formulations.
This retrospective active comparator new-user cohort study compared rates of new-onset AF and major bleeding (MB) among adult new users of IPE versus OM-3 in 2020-2024 US Veterans Affairs data. Daily drug exposure was determined via prescription dispensing dates. AF and MB outcomes were identified via validated algorithms based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, clinical modification. Confounding was accounted for via nearest-neighbor pairwise propensity score (PS) matching. The PS, constructed via logistic regression, was informed by expert-identified variables meeting the disjunctive cause criterion. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), interpretable as average treatment effects for the treated.
Cohorts for analyses of AF and MB endpoints included 1927 and 2015 people, respectively, in each of the IPE and OM-3 exposure groups. The median age was 70 years, and the groups exhibited a predominance of white (80%) males (93%). The median follow-up time was 1.29 years per person. Baseline covariates were well balanced by treatment arm after PS matching. Incidence rates for AF were 7.29 versus 7.48 per 100 person-years among new users of IPE versus OM-3. The aHR for AF was 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.82-1.63). Incidence rates for MB were 3.27 versus 3.35 per 100 person-years among new users of IPE versus OM-3. The aHR for MB was 1.22 (95% confidence interval 0.87-3.02).
Our measures of association were consistent with the null, but we were unable to rule out harms from IPE (vs. OM-3) more modest than a 63% increased rate of AF and threefold increased rate of MB.
REDUCE - IT随机试验证明了二十碳五烯酸乙酯(IPE)对心血管有益,但也引发了心房颤动(AF)和严重出血的潜在安全信号。我们旨在评估IPE与混合ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸(OM-3)制剂相比的实际安全性。
这项回顾性活性对照新用户队列研究比较了2020 - 2024年美国退伍军人事务部数据中IPE与OM-3成年新用户中心房颤动和大出血(MB)的新发率。通过处方配药日期确定每日药物暴露情况。心房颤动和大出血结局通过基于《国际疾病分类及相关健康问题统计分类》第十次修订版临床修订本的验证算法进行识别。通过最近邻配对倾向评分(PS)匹配来考虑混杂因素。通过逻辑回归构建的倾向评分由符合析因标准的专家确定变量提供信息。使用Cox回归来估计调整后的风险比(aHRs),可解释为治疗对象的平均治疗效果。
分析心房颤动和大出血终点的队列中,IPE和OM-3暴露组每组分别有1927人和2015人。中位年龄为70岁,两组中白人(80%)男性(93%)占主导。每人的中位随访时间为1.29年。倾向评分匹配后,各治疗组的基线协变量平衡良好。IPE新用户与OM-3新用户相比,心房颤动的发病率分别为每100人年7.29例和7.48例。心房颤动的调整后风险比为1.15(95%置信区间0.82 - 1.63)。IPE新用户与OM-3新用户相比,大出血的发病率分别为每100人年3.27例和3.35例。大出血的调整后风险比为1.22(95%置信区间0.87 - 3.02)。
我们的关联度量与无效假设一致,但我们无法排除IPE(与OM-3相比)导致的危害低于心房颤动发生率增加63%和大出血发生率增加三倍的情况。