Verst Luke A, Greenberg Colvin, Shin David S, Abad-Santos Matthew, Monroe Eric J, Makary Mina S, Chick Jeffrey Forris Beecham
Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Southern California, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Jan 11;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00509-8.
To evaluate access site adverse events following ClotTriever-mediated large-bore mechanical thrombectomy via small upper extremity deep veins (< 6-mm).
Twenty patients, including 24 upper extremity venous access sites, underwent ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy of the upper extremity and thoracic central veins for symptomatic deep vein obstruction unresponsive to anticoagulation. Patients without follow-up venous duplex examinations (n = 3) were excluded. Patients who had > 6-mm diameter veins accessed (n = 3) were excluded. Temporary purse-string sutures and manual pressure were used for access site hemostasis in all patients. Vein access site and diameter, technical success (defined as placement of the 13.5-French ClotTriever sheath followed by thrombectomy), and early (< 30-days) and late (> 30-days) access site-related adverse events (according to the Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria) were recorded.
Fourteen patients (8 males, 6 females; mean age 51.7 ± 13.6 years) comprising 16 upper extremity venous access sites were included in this study. Access sites included: right brachial (n = 7), left brachial (n = 5), and bilateral brachial (n = 2) veins. The mean access site diameter was 4.3-mm ± 0.67-mm. Technical success was achieved via all access sites. Six (42.9%) patients underwent stent reconstruction following thrombectomy through the same accesses. After the procedure, all purse-string sutures were removed within 24 h. Three (21.4%) patients experienced small access site hematomas that did not require transfusion, intervention, or prolonged hospitalization. Initial follow-up venous duplex ultrasounds were performed at 29.3 ± 21.7 days following intervention. The mean follow-up interval to the second and third venous duplex ultrasounds were 124.3 ± 64-days and 225.1 ± 80.1 days, respectively. One (7.1%) patient developed right arm swelling six days after the procedure and was found to have thrombosis of the previously accessed right brachial vein. No other clinically or sonographically significant access site adverse events were observed.
ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy via small upper extremity veins is safe with minimal access site adverse events.
评估通过上肢小口径深静脉(<6mm)使用ClotTriever进行大口径机械血栓切除术之后的穿刺部位不良事件。
20例患者(包括24个上肢静脉穿刺部位)因症状性深静脉阻塞对抗凝治疗无效,接受了ClotTriever介导的上肢和胸段中心静脉大口径血栓切除术。未进行随访静脉双功超声检查的患者(n = 3)被排除。静脉直径>6mm的穿刺患者(n = 3)被排除。所有患者均采用临时荷包缝合和手动压迫进行穿刺部位止血。记录静脉穿刺部位和直径、技术成功率(定义为置入13.5F的ClotTriever鞘管后进行血栓切除术)以及早期(<30天)和晚期(>30天)与穿刺部位相关的不良事件(根据介入放射学会标准的不良事件分类)。
本研究纳入了14例患者(8例男性,6例女性;平均年龄51.7±13.6岁),共16个上肢静脉穿刺部位。穿刺部位包括:右肱静脉(n = 7)、左肱静脉(n = 5)和双侧肱静脉(n = 2)。平均穿刺部位直径为4.3mm±0.67mm。所有穿刺部位均取得技术成功。6例(42.9%)患者在通过相同穿刺部位进行血栓切除术后接受了支架重建。术后,所有荷包缝合线均在24小时内拆除。3例(21.4%)患者出现小的穿刺部位血肿,无需输血、干预或延长住院时间。干预后29.3±21.7天进行了首次随访静脉双功超声检查。第二次和第三次静脉双功超声检查的平均随访间隔分别为124.3±64天和225.1±80.1天。1例(7.1%)患者在术后6天出现右臂肿胀,发现先前穿刺的右肱静脉血栓形成。未观察到其他具有临床意义或超声意义的穿刺部位不良事件。
通过上肢小静脉使用ClotTriever进行大口径血栓切除术是安全的,穿刺部位不良事件极少。