Haage Patrick, Krings Timo, Schmitz-Rode Thomas
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2002 Nov;12(11):2627-43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1615-8. Epub 2002 Aug 22.
Risk factors for acute venous occlusion range from prolonged immobilization to hypercoagulability syndromes, trauma, and malignancy. The aim of this review article is to illustrate the different imaging options for the diagnosis of acute venous occlusion and to assess the value of interventional strategies for venous thrombosis treatment in an emergency setting.First, diagnosis and treatment of the most common form of venous occlusion, at the level of the lower extremities, is presented, followed by pelvic vein and inferior vena cava occlusion, mesenteric venous thrombosis, upper extremity occlusion, acute cerebral vein thrombosis, and finally acute venous occlusion of hemodialysis access.In acute venous occlusion of the lower extremity phlebography is still the reference gold standard. Presently, duplex ultrasound with manual compression is the most sensitive and specific noninvasive test. Limitations of ultrasonography include isolated distal calf vein occlusion, obesity, and patients with lower extremity edema. If sonography is nondiagnostic, venography should be considered. Magnetic resonance venography can differentiate an acute occlusion from chronic thrombus, but because of its high cost and limited availability, it is not yet used for the routine diagnosis of lower extremity venous occlusion only. Regarding interventional treatment, catheter-directed thrombolysis can be applied to dissolve thrombus in charily selected patients with symptomatic occlusion and no contraindications to therapy. Acute occlusion of the pelvic veins and the inferior vena cava, often due to extension from the femoropopliteal system, represents a major risk for pulmonary embolism. Color flow Doppler imaging is often limited owing to obesity and bowel gas. Venography has long been considered the gold standard for identifying proximal venous occlusion. Both CT scanning and MR imaging, however, can even more accurately diagnose acute pelvis vein or inferior vena cava occlusion. MRI is preferred because it is noninvasive, does not require contrast agent, carries no exposure to ionizing radiation, and is highly accurate and reproducible. Apart from catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy has proven to be a quick and safe treatment modality by enabling the recanalization of thrombotic occlusions in conjunction with minimal invasiveness and a low bleeding risk. Mechanical thrombectomy devices should only be used in conjunction with a temporary cava filter.Contrast-enhanced CT is at present considered the examination of choice for acute mesenteric vein occlusion which has mortality rates as high as 80%. Patients with proven acute mesenteric venous occlusion and contraindications to surgical therapy and no identified bleeding disposition without looming bowel ischemia or infarction are possible contenders to the less invasive percutaneous approach either by (in)direct thrombolysis or mechanical means. Ultrasonography is the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis of upper extremity thrombosis. Computed tomography and MRI are in addition helpful in diagnosing central chest vein occlusions. The interventionalist is rarely involved in the treatment of this entity. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is known to improve lysis rates. Together with balloon angioplasty good results have been obtained. If stenosis or thrombus remains after thrombolysis and angioplasty, stent placement should follow. Within the first two weeks, thrombosed dural sinus and cerebral venous vessels are typically hyperdense on CT compared with brain parenchyma; after the course of 2 weeks, the thrombus will become isodense. In MRI an axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence, an axial diffusion-weighted MRI, coronal T1-weighted spin-echo and T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences, a coronal gradient-echo and a 3D phase-contrast venous angiogram should be performed. Local thrombolysis is needed only when patients have an exacerbation of clinical symptoms or imaging signs of worsening disease despite sufficient anticoagulation therapy. Acute occlusions of dialysialysis grafts and fistulae are a frequently encountered complication. Among the various methods described for acute occlusion screening, ultrasonography and MRI have been proven to be accurate and noninvasive; however, if immediate treatment can be anticipated, imaging should be performed directly by digital subtraction angiography before the percutaneous intervention. Initial percutaneous thrombectomy is very effective with success rates and patency rates comparable to those of surgical thrombectomy. A short thrombosis can be treated with balloon angioplasty alone, whereas an extensive thrombosis requires a combination of mechanical devices and/or thrombolytic agents with adjunctive balloon angioplasty.
急性静脉闭塞的危险因素范围广泛,从长期制动到高凝综合征、创伤和恶性肿瘤。这篇综述文章的目的是阐述用于诊断急性静脉闭塞的不同影像学方法,并评估在紧急情况下静脉血栓形成治疗中介入策略的价值。首先,介绍下肢水平最常见的静脉闭塞形式的诊断和治疗,随后是盆腔静脉和下腔静脉闭塞、肠系膜静脉血栓形成、上肢闭塞、急性脑静脉血栓形成,最后是血液透析通路的急性静脉闭塞。在下肢急性静脉闭塞中,静脉造影术仍然是参考金标准。目前,手动压迫的双功超声是最敏感且特异的非侵入性检查。超声检查的局限性包括孤立的小腿远端静脉闭塞、肥胖以及下肢水肿患者。如果超声检查无法确诊,则应考虑静脉造影。磁共振静脉造影可以区分急性闭塞和慢性血栓,但由于其成本高且可用性有限,尚未仅用于下肢静脉闭塞的常规诊断。关于介入治疗,导管直接溶栓可应用于精心挑选的有症状性闭塞且无治疗禁忌证的患者以溶解血栓。盆腔静脉和下腔静脉的急性闭塞通常是由于股腘静脉系统的扩展,是肺栓塞的主要风险。彩色多普勒血流成像常因肥胖和肠道气体而受限。长期以来,静脉造影一直被认为是识别近端静脉闭塞的金标准。然而,CT扫描和磁共振成像都能更准确地诊断急性盆腔静脉或下腔静脉闭塞。磁共振成像更受青睐,因为它是非侵入性的,不需要造影剂,不涉及电离辐射暴露,且高度准确且可重复。除了导管直接溶栓外,机械血栓切除术已被证明是一种快速且安全的治疗方式,通过使血栓性闭塞再通,具有微创性且出血风险低。机械血栓切除装置仅应与临时腔静脉滤器联合使用。目前,对比增强CT被认为是急性肠系膜静脉闭塞的首选检查方法,其死亡率高达80%。已证实患有急性肠系膜静脉闭塞且有手术治疗禁忌证且无明确出血倾向且无即将发生的肠缺血或梗死的患者,可能是采用侵入性较小的经皮方法(直接或间接溶栓或机械方法)的合适人选。超声检查是诊断上肢血栓形成的主要影像学方法。计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在诊断中心胸段静脉闭塞方面也有帮助。介入医生很少参与该疾病的治疗。已知导管直接溶栓可提高溶栓率。与球囊血管成形术一起已取得了良好效果。如果溶栓和血管成形术后仍存在狭窄或血栓,则应进行支架置入。在最初两周内,与脑实质相比,血栓形成的硬脑膜窦和脑静脉血管在CT上通常呈高密度;在两周病程后,血栓将变为等密度。在磁共振成像中,应进行轴位液体衰减反转恢复序列、轴位扩散加权磁共振成像、冠状位T1加权自旋回波和T2加权快速自旋回波序列、冠状位梯度回波和三维相位对比静脉血管造影。仅当患者在充分抗凝治疗后临床症状加重或疾病影像学征象恶化时才需要局部溶栓。透析移植物和瘘管的急性闭塞是常见的并发症。在描述的用于急性闭塞筛查的各种方法中,超声检查和磁共振成像已被证明是准确且非侵入性的;然而,如果可以预期立即进行治疗,则应在经皮介入之前直接通过数字减影血管造影进行成像。初始经皮血栓切除术非常有效,成功率和通畅率与手术血栓切除术相当。短段血栓形成可单独用球囊血管成形术治疗,而广泛的血栓形成则需要机械装置和/或溶栓剂与辅助球囊血管成形术联合使用。