Palumbo Alexandra M, Muraca Giulia M, Fuller Anne, Keown-Stoneman Charles D G, Birken Catherine S, Maguire Jonathon L, Anderson Laura N
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07106-6.
Inadequate and excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has been associated with preterm birth. However, studies demonstrate inconsistent associations.
We examined the associations between categorical and continuous total GWG and moderate to late preterm birth (32-<37 weeks), and evaluated differences in these associations by pre-pregnancy BMI.
We analyzed cross-sectional data from children participating in TARGet Kids! in Toronto, Canada. Parents of children < 6 years of age recalled pre-pregnancy weight, end-of-pregnancy weight, and gestational age. GWG was categorized according to the 2009 IOM guidelines as inadequate, recommended, or excessive for each pre-pregnancy BMI category. GWG was expressed as the percentage of recommendations met to account for gestational duration. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for moderate to late preterm birth were estimated using logistic regression models. Restricted cubic splines were used to model the adjusted predicted probability of moderate to late preterm birth against continuous GWG.
Of the 4,529 participants, 8.2% were born moderate to late preterm. 31.1% of parents met the GWG recommendations, 41.0% had excessive GWG, and 27.9% had inadequate GWG. Compared to recommended GWG, excessive GWG had increased odds of moderate to late preterm birth (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.29, 2.19). There was insufficient evidence of an association between inadequate GWG and moderate to late preterm birth (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81, 1.50). For parents who were overweight or had obesity, the risk of moderate to late preterm birth did not increase substantially until a GWG > 200% of the recommendations, which is well above the IOM recommended upper limit.
Excessive GWG was associated with an increased risk of moderate to late preterm birth, with variation in the association by pre-pregnancy BMI. Current definitions of excessive GWG may not adequately reflect increased risk of preterm birth among those with overweight or obesity.
美国医学研究所(IOM)定义的孕期体重增加不足和过多与早产有关。然而,研究表明两者之间的关联并不一致。
我们研究了分类和连续的孕期总增重与中度至晚期早产(32 - <37周)之间的关联,并评估了孕前体重指数对这些关联的影响差异。
我们分析了参与加拿大安大略省多伦多市“TARGet Kids!”项目儿童的横断面数据。6岁以下儿童的父母回忆孕前体重、孕末期体重和孕周。根据2009年IOM指南,将孕期增重分为不足、推荐或过多三类,具体分类依据孕前体重指数类别而定。孕期增重以达到推荐值的百分比来表示,以考虑孕期时长。使用逻辑回归模型估计中度至晚期早产的调整优势比(aOR)。使用受限立方样条来模拟中度至晚期早产的调整预测概率与连续孕期增重之间的关系。
在4529名参与者中,8.2%为中度至晚期早产。31.1%的父母孕期增重达到推荐值,41.0%的父母孕期增重过多,27.9%的父母孕期增重不足。与推荐的孕期增重相比,孕期增重过多会增加中度至晚期早产的几率(aOR 1.68,95%置信区间1.29,2.19)。没有足够的证据表明孕期增重不足与中度至晚期早产之间存在关联(aOR 1.10,95%置信区间0.81,1.50)。对于超重或肥胖的父母,直到孕期增重超过推荐值的200%,中度至晚期早产的风险才会大幅增加,这远高于IOM推荐的上限。
孕期增重过多与中度至晚期早产风险增加有关,且这种关联因孕前体重指数而异。当前对孕期增重过多的定义可能无法充分反映超重或肥胖者早产风险的增加。