Faria Ana Paula Vieira, Silva Thales Philipe Rodrigues da, Abreu Mery Natali Silva, Canastra Maria Albertina, Fernandes Ana Clara, Martins Eunice Francisca, Ferreira Fernanda Marçal, Matozinhos Fernanda Penido
School of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Women's Health Nursing Department, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo (Unifesp), Rua Napoleão de Barros, 754, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06975-1.
Breastfeeding provides several benefits to the health of women and newborns and constituting a protective factor against infant morbidity and mortality in the short and long term.
OBJECTIVES/RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The study aims to compare obstetric outcomes in women who did and did not breastfeed after birth.
Cross-sectional epidemiological study, nested in a cohort, carried out with secondary data from the survey "Birth and breastfeeding in children of mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2", carried out in 2020, in Brazil. The results obtained were compared with those of the study "Birth in Belo Horizonte: survey on childbirth and birth", carried out in 2011-2012.
1082 women were included in the sample of the survey carried out in the pandemic period and 382 in the pre-pandemic period. A total of 1,082 women were included in the sample of the research carried out during the pandemic period and 382 during the pre-pandemic period. A higher proportion of women who breastfed within the first hour after delivery and: did not have an indication for cesarean section in the pre-pandemic period and women without obstetric complications in the pre-pandemic period were observed when compared to the pandemic period. Regarding the comparison between infected/suspected and non-infected women, we observed: higher proportions of women who had a vaginal delivery and breastfed after delivery in non-infected women and higher proportions of non-infected women, with no indication for cesarean section at the time of admission and who breastfed within the first hour after delivery - when compared to infected/suspected women. Finally, regarding the multivariate analysis of the pre-pandemic period, we observed that women who had fewer than 7 prenatal consultations reduced, on average, 0.36 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p = 0.007). Regarding the pandemic period, we observed that women who underwent cesarean section reduced, on average, 0.61 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p = 0.027), women who had a newborn weighing less than 2500 g reduced, on average, 0.29 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p = 0.031) and women who had a newborn with complications after delivery reduced, on average, 0.05 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p < 0.001).
These findings highlight the importance of prenatal monitoring and childbirth assistance, especially in times of crisis, to promote breastfeeding. Furthermore, these findings may provide important contributions to improving health and care related to labor, delivery, birth and the postpartum period.
母乳喂养对女性和新生儿的健康有诸多益处,是预防婴幼儿短期和长期发病及死亡的保护因素。
目的/研究问题:本研究旨在比较产后进行母乳喂养和未进行母乳喂养的女性的产科结局。
横断面流行病学研究,嵌套于一个队列研究中,使用2020年在巴西进行的“感染新冠病毒母亲的孩子的出生与母乳喂养”调查的二手数据。将所得结果与2011 - 2012年进行的“贝洛奥里藏特的出生:分娩与出生调查”的结果进行比较。
大流行期间调查样本纳入了1082名女性,大流行前时期纳入了382名女性。与大流行期间相比,观察到在产后第一小时内进行母乳喂养且在大流行前时期无剖宫产指征以及无产科并发症的女性比例更高。关于感染/疑似感染女性与未感染女性的比较,我们观察到:未感染女性中阴道分娩且产后进行母乳喂养的比例更高,以及未感染女性中入院时无剖宫产指征且在产后第一小时内进行母乳喂养的比例更高——与感染/疑似感染女性相比。最后,关于大流行前时期的多变量分析,我们观察到产前检查少于7次的女性产后进行母乳喂养的几率平均降低0.36倍(p = 0.007)。关于大流行期间,我们观察到进行剖宫产的女性产后进行母乳喂养的几率平均降低0.61倍(p = 0.027),新生儿体重低于2500克的女性产后进行母乳喂养 的几率平均降低0.29倍(p = 0.031),产后新生儿有并发症的女性产后进行母乳喂养的几率平均降低0.05倍(p < 0.001)。
这些发现凸显了产前监测和分娩护理的重要性,尤其是在危机时期,以促进母乳喂养。此外,这些发现可能为改善与分娩、生产、出生及产后时期相关的健康和护理做出重要贡献。