• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚单药治疗与丙泊酚联合用药用于无痛胃镜检查的安全性和有效性比较。

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of ciprofol monotherapy versus combined propofol for painless gastroscopy.

作者信息

Shan Yongzhuang, Zhai Wenshan, Hou Yayun, Li Guangming

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, China/Department of Anesthesiology, Huai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Huai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Pak J Pharm Sci. 2024 Nov-Dec;37(6):1391-1399.

PMID:39799453
Abstract

Traditional sedatives like Propofol can lead to adverse effects. This study compares the safety and efficacy of Ciprofol monotherapy versus combined Propofol for painless gastroscopy. Patients underwent painless gastroscopy at our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were studied. Sedation quality, adverse events, patient satisfaction, cognitive function, pain, anxiety, gastrointestinal side effects and endoscopic quality and so on was recorded and assessed. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing painless gastroscopy from January to December 2023. Participants (n = 200) were categorized into Ciprofol (n = 102) and Combined Propofol (n = 98) groups. The Ciprofol group exhibited longer sedation onset (4.35 ± 1.71 min) but significantly quicker recovery (12.64 ± 4.54 min) compared to the combined group. Adverse events of nausea (2.94% vs 10.20%, p = 0.037) and vomiting (1.96% vs 9.18%, p = 0.025) were less frequent in the Ciprofol group, although satisfaction scores were similar between groups. Cognitive function, pain, anxiety levels and gastrointestinal side effects was comparable. Endoscopy quality measures showed no significant differences. Cyclophenol monotherapy is a viable alternative to combine Propofol, offering a reduced incidence of adverse effects and quicker recovery without compromising procedure quality or cognitive outcomes.

摘要

像丙泊酚这样的传统镇静剂可能会导致不良反应。本研究比较了丙泊酚单药治疗与联合丙泊酚用于无痛胃镜检查的安全性和有效性。对2023年1月至2023年12月在我院接受无痛胃镜检查的患者进行了研究。记录并评估了镇静质量、不良事件、患者满意度、认知功能、疼痛、焦虑、胃肠道副作用和内镜检查质量等。对2023年1月至12月接受无痛胃镜检查的患者进行了回顾性分析。参与者(n = 200)被分为丙泊酚组(n = 102)和联合丙泊酚组(n = 98)。与联合组相比,丙泊酚组的镇静起效时间更长(4.35 ± 1.71分钟),但恢复明显更快(12.64 ± 4.54分钟)。丙泊酚组恶心(2.94%对10.20%,p = 0.037)和呕吐(1.96%对9.18%,p = 0.

相似文献

1
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of ciprofol monotherapy versus combined propofol for painless gastroscopy.丙泊酚单药治疗与丙泊酚联合用药用于无痛胃镜检查的安全性和有效性比较。
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2024 Nov-Dec;37(6):1391-1399.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, and propofol and etomidate mixture, and ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopy: A randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial.在接受无痛胃镜检查的患者中,比较西普罗尔、丙泊酚、丙泊酚和依托咪酯混合物以及西普罗尔和依托咪酯混合物的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲对照临床试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 6;103(36):e39585. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039585.
3
The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.西普罗和丙泊酚在结肠镜检查患者中的疗效和安全性:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Aug;95:111474. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111474. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
4
The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.西普罗与异丙酚用于无痛宫腔镜检查患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02787-0.
5
Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial.比较西普鲁福(HSK3486)与异丙酚用于胃镜和结肠镜检查中深度镇静诱导的效果:一项多中心、非劣效性、随机、对照 3 期临床试验。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Aug;131(2):138-148. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13761. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
6
Safety and efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis.环丙泊酚与丙泊酚用于胃肠内镜检查的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03734-0.
7
Effect of Lidocaine on Ciprofol Dosage and Efficacy in Patients Who Underwent Gastroscopy Sedation.利多卡因对行胃镜镇静患者丙泊酚剂量和疗效的影响。
Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2024 Nov 7;30:e945751. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.945751.
8
Safety and efficacy analysis of ciprofol combined with low-dose alfentanil in sedation of patients during transesophageal echocardiography: a randomized double-blind controlled study.丙泊酚联合小剂量阿芬太尼在经食管超声心动图检查中对患者镇静的安全性和有效性分析:一项随机双盲对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Mar;41(3):397-402. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2487102. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
9
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciprofol after continuous infusion in elderly patients.老年患者持续输注环丙泊酚后的药代动力学和药效学
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02907-4.
10
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.环丙泊酚与丙泊酚用于成人胃肠道内镜检查镇静的系统评价与Meta分析
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Nov;90(11):1013-1021. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18203-X.