Babadostu Mübeccel Kübra, Eyrenci Aslı
Department of Psychology, French La Paix Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Department of Psychology, Maltepe University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70076. doi: 10.1002/pon.70076.
In recent years, many studies have investigated the triggers, perpetuating factors, and outcomes of Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR), highlighting its complexity with multiple dimensions that encompass both antecedents and consequences. In this sense, the cognitive approach to FCR has explored variables such as metacognition, maladaptive coping strategies, and intolerance of uncertainty (IU). On the other hand, the findings of a restricted number of studies investigating the relationship between FCR and stated variables appear to be inconsistent. The objective of this study was thus to examine the relationship that existed among these variables in breast cancer survivors by moderated mediation model.
In this cross-sectional study, 130 breast cancer survivors completed the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI), the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale Short Form (IUS-12), Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), and Brief COPE Scale (BCS) Short Form. The mediated moderation analysis was conducted using Process Macro.
There was a significant positive correlation found between FCR and IU (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), and between FCR and negative metacognitions (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). A weak to moderate positive correlation was identified between IU and maladaptive coping strategies (r = 0.19, p < 0.05), and between negative metacognitions and maladaptive coping strategies (r = 0.31, p < 0.001). The relationship between FCR and maladaptive coping strategies was nonsignificant (r = 0.16, p > 0.05). As a result of hierarchical regression analysis, controlling for demographic and clinical variables, IU, positive metacognitions, and negative metacognitions significantly explained 45%, 2%, and 1% of the variance in FCR, respectively.
The results of the current study contribute to the literature in terms of supporting the views that cognitive models of worrying could be used to understand the FCR mechanism and address the IU been which has limitedly studied in the FCR literature. The current study's findings have also contributed to the clinical field by highlighting the importance of incorporating breast cancer survivors' metacognitions and IU in FCR intervention programs.
近年来,许多研究调查了癌症复发恐惧(FCR)的触发因素、持续因素和结果,强调了其多维度的复杂性,涵盖了前因和后果。从这个意义上说,FCR的认知方法探索了诸如元认知、适应不良的应对策略和不确定性不耐受(IU)等变量。另一方面,少数研究FCR与所述变量之间关系的结果似乎并不一致。因此,本研究的目的是通过调节中介模型检验乳腺癌幸存者中这些变量之间存在的关系。
在这项横断面研究中,130名乳腺癌幸存者完成了癌症复发恐惧量表(FCRI)、不确定性不耐受量表简版(IUS - 12)、元认知问卷 - 30(MCQ - 30)和简易应对方式问卷简版(BCS)。使用Process Macro进行中介调节分析。
FCR与IU之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.87,p < 0.001),FCR与消极元认知之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.72,p < 0.001)。IU与适应不良的应对策略之间存在弱至中度正相关(r = 0.19,p < 0.05),消极元认知与适应不良的应对策略之间存在正相关(r = 0.31,p < 0.001)。FCR与适应不良的应对策略之间的关系不显著(r = 0.16,p > 0.05)。经过分层回归分析,在控制人口统计学和临床变量后,IU、积极元认知和消极元认知分别显著解释了FCR变异的45%、2%和1%。
本研究结果支持了以下观点,即担忧的认知模型可用于理解FCR机制并解决FCR文献中研究有限的IU问题,从而为该领域的文献做出了贡献。本研究结果还强调了将乳腺癌幸存者的元认知和IU纳入FCR干预项目的重要性,为临床领域做出了贡献。