Ning Xiaoxiang, Yang Dengfa, Ao Weiqun, Guo Yuwen, Ding Li, Zhang Zhen, Ma Luyao
Department of Radiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Department of Radiology, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan 12. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04800-7.
To develop and validate a clinical-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in rectal cancer.
This retrospective study included data from 239 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma from two centers, all of whom underwent MRI examinations. Cases from the first center (n = 189) were randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set at a 7:3 ratio, while cases from the second center (n = 50) constituted the external validation set. The clinical features and MRI imaging characteristics of the patients in the training set were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for LVI in rectal cancer, and these risk factors were then used to construct a clinical model. Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences for feature extraction. After feature reduction and selection, the most strongly correlated features were identified, and their respective regression coefficients were calculated to construct the radiomics model. Finally, a combined clinical-radiomics model was built using a weighted linear combination of features and was visualized as a nomogram. The predictive performance of each model was quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in both training and validation sets, with DeLong analysis being used to compare model performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of each model in the validation sets.
In the 239 patients, the combined model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in predicting LVI in rectal cancer. The combined model showed excellent predictive performance in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, with AUCs of 0.90 (0.88-0.97), 0.88 (0.78-0.99), and 0.88 (0.78-0.95), respectively. The sensitivity values were 75.9%, 68.8%, and 80.0%, respectively, and the specificity values were 90.3%, 92.7%, and 88.6%. DCA results indicated that the nomogram of the combined model had superior clinical utility compared with the clinical and radiomics models.
The clinical-radiomics nomogram serves as a valuable tool for non-invasive preoperative prediction of LVI status in patients with rectal cancer.
开发并验证一种用于术前预测直肠癌淋巴管侵犯(LVI)的临床-放射组学模型。
这项回顾性研究纳入了来自两个中心的239例经病理证实的直肠腺癌患者的数据,所有患者均接受了MRI检查。将第一个中心的病例(n = 189)按7:3的比例随机分为训练集和内部验证集,而第二个中心的病例(n = 50)构成外部验证集。分析训练集中患者的临床特征和MRI影像特征。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定直肠癌LVI的独立危险因素,然后利用这些危险因素构建临床模型。在T2加权成像(T2WI)和扩散加权成像(DWI)序列上勾画感兴趣区(ROI)以进行特征提取。经过特征降维和选择后,确定相关性最强的特征,并计算其各自的回归系数以构建放射组学模型。最后,使用特征的加权线性组合构建联合临床-放射组学模型,并将其可视化为列线图。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)对训练集和验证集中每个模型的预测性能进行量化,采用DeLong分析比较模型性能。决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估每个模型在验证集中的临床实用性。
在239例患者中,联合模型在预测直肠癌LVI方面优于临床模型和放射组学模型。联合模型在训练集、内部验证集和外部验证集中均表现出优异的预测性能,AUC分别为0.90(0.88 - 0.97)、0.88(0.78 - 0.99)和0.88(0.78 - 0.95)。敏感性值分别为75.9%、68.8%和80.0%,特异性值分别为90.3%、92.7%和88.6%。DCA结果表明,联合模型的列线图与临床模型和放射组学模型相比具有更高的临床实用性。
临床-放射组学列线图是术前无创预测直肠癌患者LVI状态的有价值工具。