Comparative analysis of public concerns regarding treated water discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: perspectives before and after the initial release.
作者信息
Liu Mengjie, Matsunaga Hitomi, Orita Makiko, Kashiwazaki Yuya, Xiao Xu, Takamura Noboru
机构信息
Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki Prefecture 852-8523, Japan.
出版信息
J Radiat Res. 2025 Jan 22;66(1):103-105. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae102.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comparative analysis of public concerns regarding treated water discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: perspectives before and after the initial release.福岛第一核电站处理后废水排放的公众关注度比较分析：首次排放前后的观点
J Radiat Res. 2025 Jan 22;66(1):103-105. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae102.
2
R&D of JAEA for the decommissioning of TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station.日本原子能研究开发机构（JAEA）为东电福岛第一核电站退役而进行的研发工作。
Ann ICRP. 2021 Jul;50(1_suppl):37-43. doi: 10.1177/01466453211010892. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Microbiome analysis of the restricted bacteria in radioactive element-containing water at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.福岛第一核电站含放射性元素水中限制细菌的微生物组分析。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024 Apr 17;90(4):e0211323. doi: 10.1128/aem.02113-23. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
Radiation-related anxiety among public health nurses in the Fukushima Prefecture after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: a cross-sectional study.福岛第一核电站事故后福岛县公共卫生护士的辐射相关焦虑：一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e013564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013564.
5
[Ten Years from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident: Were the Predicted Effects Reported by Worldwide Experts Correct?].[福岛第一核电站事故十年后：全球专家预测的影响是否得到证实？]
Igaku Butsuri. 2021;41(3):127-133. doi: 10.11323/jjmp.41.3_127.
6
Estimation of internal dose from tap water after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident using newly obtained data.利用新获得的数据估算福岛第一核电站事故后自来水中的内照射剂量。
J Radiat Res. 2020 Mar 23;61(2):231-236. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz089.
7
Analysis of the Regionality of the Number of Tweets Related to the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Content Analysis.2011年福岛核电站灾难相关推文数量的区域性分析：内容分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Dec 18;4(4):e70. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7496.
8
No need to panic over the release of 'treated water' containing tritium from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.无需对福岛第一核电站排放含氚“处理水”感到恐慌。
QJM. 2023 Nov 24;116(11):957. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcad211.
9
Association of the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Daiichi Nuclear Disaster in Fukushima City, Japan, With Birth Rates.日本福岛市的东日本大地震和第一核电站灾难与出生率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7455.
10
Incidence of Thyroid Cancer Among Children and Young Adults in Fukushima, Japan, Screened With 2 Rounds of Ultrasonography Within 5 Years of the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident.日本福岛县儿童和青年在福岛第一核电站事故后 5 年内接受两轮超声筛查的甲状腺癌发病率。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jan 1;145(1):4-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3121.
引用本文的文献
1
Residents of the towns in which the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear station is located express more worries about reputational damage than about the discharge of treated water itself.福岛第一核电站所在城镇的居民对声誉受损的担忧超过了对处理后废水排放本身的担忧。
J Radiat Res. 2025 Mar 24;66(2):196-198. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraf003.
本文引用的文献
1
Thoughts, perceptions and concerns of coastal residents regarding the discharge of tritium-containing treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean.关于福岛第一核电站处理水中氚的排放到太平洋，沿海居民的想法、看法和担忧。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17349-1.
2
Bring voices from the coast into the Fukushima treated water debate.让沿海地区的声音参与到福岛核污染水问题的讨论中来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 8;119(45):e2205431119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205431119. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Study protocol for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.福岛健康管理调查研究方案。
J Epidemiol. 2012;22(5):375-83. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20120105. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
Zotero 插件