Suppr超能文献

SCOPE2试验中的放射治疗质量保证:对于英国下一项食管癌试验我们能吸取哪些经验教训?

Radiotherapy Quality Assurance in the SCOPE2 Trial: What Lessons can be Learned for the Next UK Trial in Oesophageal Cancer?

作者信息

Helbrow J, Lewis G, Hurt C, Radhakrishna G, Nicholas O, Hawkins M A, Mukherjee S, Graby J, Crosby T, Gwynne S

机构信息

South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK; National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) Group, National Institute for Health and Care Research, UK.

National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) Group, National Institute for Health and Care Research, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2025 Feb;38:103735. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.103735. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

Abstract

AIMS

The SCOPE2 trial evaluates radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation for oesophageal cancer. We report findings from the accompanying RT quality assurance (RTQA) programme and identify recommendations for PROTIEUS, the next UK trial in oesophageal RT.

MAETRIALS AND METHODS

SCOPE2's RTQA programme consisted of a pre-accrual and on-trial component. RTQA pre-accrual requirements included acceptable submission of 3D ± 4D benchmark contouring exercise(s) and a high-dose planning case. On-trial requirements for contouring and planning included prospective reviews (PRs) of each centre's first 3D ± 4D patient and all high-dose cases prior to formal safety review. Further PRs were at the RTQA team's discretion. Timely retrospective reviews (TRRs) were also undertaken for a random 10%. Submissions were assessed against pre-defined criteria and RT planning guidance document (RPGD). This study includes initial submissions only; subsequent resubmissions are not included in this analysis.

RESULTS

For contouring, 30/64 (47%) pre-accrual submissions were approved. 38/64 (59%) contained ≥1 target volume (TV) unacceptable variation from protocol (UV), most commonly in CTVB and ITV. Organ-at-risk (OAR) contour review was undertaken in 28/64 (44%); 6/28 (21%) contained ≥1 UV, most commonly in heart and spinal cord. 82/126 (65%) on-trial submissions were approved. 47/126 (37%) contained ≥1 TV UV, most commonly in CTVB, GTV and ITV. For OARs, 30/126 (24%) contained ≥1 UV, most commonly in heart and lungs. On-trial contour submissions were significantly more likely to be approved than pre-accrual (p = 0.016). For planning, 32/43 (79%) pre-accrual plans were approved, those unacceptable were due to PTV coverage/conformity. 118/120 (98%) on-trial plans were approved, the remaining unacceptable were due to PTV coverage/conformity. No UVs in OAR dose constraints were observed. All on-trial submissions were approved following resubmission where necessary.

CONCLUSION

Despite an RPGD, contouring atlas, and similar contouring protocols from preceding trials, the SCOPE2 RTQA programme demonstrates a high frequency of UVs. Our findings inform recommendations for future oesophageal RT trials.

摘要

目的

SCOPE2试验评估食管癌的放疗剂量递增情况。我们报告了随附的放疗质量保证(RTQA)计划的结果,并确定了英国下一项食管癌放疗试验PROTIEUS的建议。

材料与方法

SCOPE2的RTQA计划包括预入组和试验期两个部分。RTQA预入组要求包括可接受地提交3D±4D基准轮廓勾画练习和一个高剂量计划病例。试验期轮廓勾画和计划的要求包括在正式安全性审查之前对每个中心的首例3D±4D患者和所有高剂量病例进行前瞻性审查(PR)。进一步的PR由RTQA团队自行决定。还对10%的病例进行了随机及时回顾性审查(TRR)。提交的材料根据预定义标准和放疗计划指导文件(RPGD)进行评估。本研究仅包括初始提交的材料;后续的重新提交材料不包括在本分析中。

结果

对于轮廓勾画,预入组提交的64份材料中有30份(47%)被批准。64份材料中有38份(59%)包含≥1个靶区体积(TV)与方案存在不可接受的差异(UV),最常见于临床靶区体积(CTV)和内靶区(ITV)。对28/64(44%)的危及器官(OAR)轮廓进行了审查;28份中有6份(21%)包含≥1个UV,最常见于心和脊髓。试验期提交的126份材料中有82份(65%)被批准。126份材料中有47份(37%)包含≥1个TV UV,最常见于CTV、大体肿瘤体积(GTV)和ITV。对于OAR,126份材料中有30份(24%)包含≥1个UV,最常见于心和肺。试验期轮廓提交材料比预入组更有可能被批准(p = 0.016)。对于计划,预入组的43份计划中有32份(79%)被批准,那些不可接受的计划是由于计划靶区(PTV)覆盖/适形性问题。试验期的120份计划中有118份(98%)被批准,其余不可接受的计划也是由于PTV覆盖/适形性问题。在OAR剂量限制方面未观察到UV。所有试验期提交材料在必要时重新提交后均获批准。

结论

尽管有RPGD、轮廓图谱以及先前试验的类似轮廓勾画方案,但SCOPE2 RTQA计划显示出较高频率的UV。我们的研究结果为未来食管癌放疗试验提供了建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验