Holt Kelsey, Gomez Rouselinne, Amongin Dinah, Omoluabi Elizabeth, Chung Stephanie, Birabwa Catherine, Dimowo Shakede, Challa Sneha, Waiswa Peter, Idiodi Ivan, Phillips Beth, Nanono Sylvia, Jegede Ayobambo, Liu Jenny, Wasswa Ronald, Nmadu Grace, Okoli Chioma, Tijani Aminat, Galavotti Christine
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Contraception. 2025 Apr;144:110813. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110813. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
This study aimed to evaluate construct validity of the contraception-focused "Preference-aligned Fertility Management" (PFM) Index, a new person-centered and rights-based outcome measure, in Nigeria and Uganda.
We analyzed survey data from convenience samples of new users of contraception and nonusers of contraception in Uganda and users of contraception in Nigeria. PFM Index scores were calculated by combining two indicators: indicator 1 assessing alignment between desire to use contraception and actual use; indicator 2 evaluating whether users' current methods are desired. We developed a nomological network of related constructs and conducted bivariable logistic regressions, predicting the odds of PFM associated with each variable.
A total of 71.3% of contraception users in Nigeria, 99.2% of new users in Uganda, and 42.9% of nonusers in Uganda were practicing contraception-focused PFM. In Nigeria, high Women's and Girls' Empowerment in Sexual and Reproductive Health Index scores and permission to visit a health center were significantly associated with higher odds of contraception-focused PFM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.01-7.31; OR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.04-6.73, respectively). In Uganda, women's and partner's secondary school education were significantly associated with higher odds of contraception-focused PFM (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.58-4.24; OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.54-2.62, respectively); as were concordance with partner's desired number of children, recent experience of gender-based violence, and satisfaction with what (if anything) one is doing to prevent pregnancy (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.30-1.69; OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.52-3.56; OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 2.77-7.12, respectively).
The contraception-focused PFM Index demonstrated construct validity in Nigeria and Uganda. PFM and other new measures of self-defined need contribute to the paradigm shift underway to align contraception indicators with human rights principles.
The contraception-focused PFM Index is a novel person-centered, rights-based measure that can be used to gauge whether individuals' self-defined needs related to contraception are met by programs and policies. Our study finds evidence for construct validity of the index among contraceptive users in Nigeria and Uganda and nonusers in Uganda.
本研究旨在评估以避孕为重点的“偏好一致的生育管理”(PFM)指数在尼日利亚和乌干达的结构效度,这是一种新的以个人为中心且基于权利的结果测量方法。
我们分析了来自乌干达避孕新用户和非避孕用户的便利样本以及尼日利亚避孕用户的调查数据。PFM指数得分通过结合两个指标来计算:指标1评估使用避孕措施的意愿与实际使用之间的一致性;指标2评估用户当前使用的方法是否是他们想要的。我们构建了一个相关结构的概念网络,并进行了双变量逻辑回归,预测与每个变量相关的PFM几率。
在尼日利亚,71.3%的避孕用户、在乌干达99.2%的新用户以及在乌干达42.9%的非用户采用了以避孕为重点的PFM。在尼日利亚,性与生殖健康方面较高的妇女和女童赋权指数得分以及前往健康中心的许可与以避孕为重点的PFM几率较高显著相关(优势比[OR]=2.72;95%置信区间=1.01 - 7.31;OR = 2.64;95%置信区间=1.04 - 6.73)。在乌干达,妇女及其伴侣的中学教育与以避孕为重点的PFM几率较高显著相关(OR = 2.58,95%置信区间=1.58 - 4.24;OR = 2.01;95%置信区间=1.54 - 2.62);与伴侣期望的子女数量一致、近期遭受性别暴力的经历以及对自身为预防怀孕所采取措施(若有)的满意度也与之相关(OR = 1.48,95%置信区间=1.30 - 1.69;OR = 2.33;95%置信区间=1.52 - 3.56;OR = 4.44,95%置信区间=2.77 - 7.12)。
以避孕为重点的PFM指数在尼日利亚和乌干达证明了结构效度。PFM以及其他自我定义需求的新测量方法有助于正在进行的将避孕指标与人权原则相契合的范式转变。
以避孕为重点的PFM指数是一种新颖的以个人为中心、基于权利的测量方法,可用于衡量项目和政策是否满足了个人与避孕相关的自我定义需求。我们的研究为该指数在尼日利亚的避孕用户以及乌干达的避孕用户和非用户中的结构效度找到了证据。