Discipline of Public Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211060641. doi: 10.1177/17455065211060641.
INTRODUCTION: Unplanned pregnancy continues to be a global reproductive and public health concern among women. This study aimed to investigate whether factors associated with modern contraceptive use differ by age-group among young and older women of reproductive age. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among 433 women of reproductive age, with the median age of 25 years (interquartile range: 21-28), and aged between 18 and 49. Data were collected from 10 public health care clinics in Umlazi Township, KwaZulu-Natal, using a structured questionnaire. Data were coded, entered into Epi Data Manager and exported to Stata for analysis. A Pearson's chi-square test and logistic regression models were employed to assess the level of the association between the predictor and outcome variables, and the p-value of 0.05 or lower was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Most women in the sample (n = 351, 81%) had obtained a secondary level of education, while 53% (n = 230) were unemployed and 89% (n = 387) were single. We found that women with secondary level of education (AOR: 2.89, 95% CI: 0.99-5.38) or a tertiary level of education (AOR 3.80, 95% CI: 1.07-3.53) were more likely to use contraceptive methods compared to women with lower education. Women who experienced unplanned pregnancy (AOR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22-3.79) were more likely to use contraceptives. Women aged 25-49 years who experienced pregnancy, whether planned (AOR 3.87, 95% CI: 1.08-3.89) or unplanned (AOR 3.60, 95% CI: 2.15-4.19), were more likely to use a contraceptive method. Results showed that the level of education (p = 0.942) and whether one experienced unplanned pregnancy (p = 0.913) were not significant predictors of contraceptive use among women aged 18-24 years. CONCLUSION: Concerted educational efforts to addressing existing barriers deterring women from accessing contraception among young women are necessary. Different groups of women should be targeted with family planning interventions specific to their needs.
简介:意外怀孕仍然是全球育龄妇女的生殖健康和公共卫生关注问题。本研究旨在调查在年轻和年长育龄妇女中,与现代避孕方法使用相关的因素是否因年龄组而异。
方法:这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 433 名育龄妇女,中位年龄 25 岁(四分位间距:21-28 岁),年龄 18-49 岁。数据来自夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省乌姆拉齐镇的 10 家公共医疗诊所,使用结构化问卷收集。数据经过编码,输入 Epi Data Manager 并导出到 Stata 进行分析。采用 Pearson 卡方检验和逻辑回归模型评估预测变量和结果变量之间的关联程度,p 值小于等于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
结果:样本中大多数妇女(n=351,81%)接受过中学教育,53%(n=230)失业,89%(n=387)单身。我们发现,与受教育程度较低的妇女相比,具有中学教育水平(AOR:2.89,95%CI:0.99-5.38)或高等教育水平(AOR:3.80,95%CI:1.07-3.53)的妇女更有可能使用避孕方法。经历过意外怀孕的妇女(AOR:0.51,95%CI:0.22-3.79)更有可能使用避孕方法。25-49 岁经历过怀孕的妇女,无论是计划内(AOR:3.87,95%CI:1.08-3.89)还是意外怀孕(AOR:3.60,95%CI:2.15-4.19),更有可能使用避孕方法。结果表明,教育程度(p=0.942)和是否经历意外怀孕(p=0.913)都不是 18-24 岁妇女使用避孕方法的显著预测因素。
结论:需要开展协调一致的教育工作,解决阻碍年轻妇女获得避孕服务的现有障碍。应针对不同群体的妇女开展具体的计划生育干预措施,以满足其需求。