Azevedo Liane B, Downes Megan, Eastburn Sara, Covell Jane, Bissell Paul
College of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jan;51(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/cch.70022.
Interactive electronic devices (IEDs) are ubiquitous in young children's lives. However, research on their impact on learning and development is still limited. The aim of this study was to understand the perspectives of early years practitioners (EYPs) and public health consultants (PHCs) on the use of IEDs in children aged 3-5.
Using purposive sampling techniques, we recruited four EYPs and two PHCs from children's nurseries and a government organisation in the northwest of England. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. Data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.
EYPs and PHCs noted that although IEDs could negatively impact child development and behaviour, they could also aid in learning. EYPs expressed concerns about the impact of parents' own IED habits on children's communication and social skills. On the other hand, PHCs stressed that substituting outdoor play with the use of these devices could affect children's social and physical skills and reduce physical activity levels, which are crucial for development. Finally, both EYPs and PHCs agreed that there was a need to improve parents' and EYP's knowledge and to develop interactive interventions to promote an understanding of how IEDs should be used with young children.
EYPs and PHCs acknowledge the potential advantages of using IEDs as a teaching tool for children. However, they have concerns about the long-term effects on communication, social and physical skills and how children are impacted by their parents' use of these devices. To support policy statements, future research should offer further evidence of the benefits and harms of IED use.
交互式电子设备(IEDs)在幼儿生活中无处不在。然而,关于其对学习和发展影响的研究仍然有限。本研究的目的是了解幼儿教育从业者(EYPs)和公共卫生顾问(PHCs)对3至5岁儿童使用IEDs的看法。
采用目的抽样技术,我们从英格兰西北部的儿童托儿所和一个政府组织中招募了四名幼儿教育从业者和两名公共卫生顾问。使用半结构化访谈收集数据,对访谈进行录音、逐字转录并匿名处理。采用反思性主题分析对数据进行分析。
幼儿教育从业者和公共卫生顾问指出,虽然IEDs可能对儿童发展和行为产生负面影响,但它们也有助于学习。幼儿教育从业者对家长自身使用IEDs的习惯对孩子沟通和社交技能的影响表示担忧。另一方面,公共卫生顾问强调,用这些设备替代户外活动可能会影响孩子的社交和身体技能,并降低身体活动水平,而身体活动水平对发展至关重要。最后,幼儿教育从业者和公共卫生顾问都一致认为,有必要提高家长和幼儿教育从业者的知识水平,并开展互动干预措施,以促进对如何与幼儿使用IEDs的理解。
幼儿教育从业者和公共卫生顾问认可将IEDs用作儿童教学工具的潜在优势。然而,他们担心这对沟通、社交和身体技能的长期影响,以及孩子如何受到家长使用这些设备的影响。为支持政策声明,未来的研究应提供关于使用IEDs利弊的进一步证据。