Lysons Joanna L, Mendez Pineda Rocio, Aquino Maria Raisa Jessica, Cann Hannah, Fearon Pasco, Kendall Sally, Kirman Jennifer, Woodman Jenny
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Murray Edwards College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e091080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091080.
Every child in England should be offered a health and development review at age 2-2½ years by the health visiting service, part of which includes an assessment of child development. The Department of Health and Social Care mandates the use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) at this review as a tool to collect population-level data on children's early development for monitoring of trends and disparities. This tool also forms part of the practitioner's assessment of the child's early development. To inform policy and practice, the present study gathered the views and experiences of parents and health visiting professionals on key priorities for, and barriers to, a universal assessment of early child development at age 2-2½ years.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We held 15 focus groups with 29 parents, 24 health visitors and nursery nurses, five service managers and five policy colleagues in England. Participants were asked to reflect on their experiences of, and priorities for, measuring child development at the 2-2½ year universal review.
We analysed data using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
We identified two overarching themes in the data. The first theme, reflected a consistent priority-across all focus groups-for a measure of child development that was well embedded in the wider review, that facilitated conversations about the child and family system and allowed negotiation of parent and professional judgement of the child's development and had a clear stated purpose. The second theme, reflected the need for a clear purpose for, and less variable delivery of, the tool, including a need for clarification on its intended purpose to provide population-level data.
Parents and practitioners wanted a tool that facilitated a holistic conversation about development, well-being and health across the family system, with direct observation of the child by the professional. Used skilfully, the tool can constitute an intervention in itself, as it helps scaffold a conversation about how parents can support their child's optimal growth and development. Consideration should be given to the experience of and support available to the practitioner using the tool within the health and developmental review.
英国的每个孩子在2至2.5岁时都应接受健康访视服务提供的健康与发育评估,其中部分内容包括对儿童发育的评估。卫生和社会保健部规定在此次评估中使用《年龄与阶段问卷》(ASQ - 3),作为收集有关儿童早期发育的人群层面数据以监测趋势和差异的工具。该工具也是从业者评估儿童早期发育的一部分。为了为政策制定和实践提供信息,本研究收集了家长和健康访视专业人员对于2至2.5岁儿童早期发育通用评估的关键优先事项和障碍的看法与经验。
设计、背景、参与者:我们在英国与29位家长、24位健康访视员和保育员、5位服务经理以及5位政策同事进行了15次焦点小组讨论。参与者被要求反思他们在2至2.5岁通用评估中测量儿童发育的经验和优先事项。
我们使用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析。
我们在数据中确定了两个总体主题。第一个主题反映了所有焦点小组一致的优先事项,即一种融入更广泛评估的儿童发育测量方法,它有助于就儿童和家庭系统展开对话,允许就家长和专业人员对儿童发育的判断进行协商,并且有明确的既定目的。第二个主题反映了对该工具要有明确目的以及更一致的应用方式的需求,包括需要明确其用于提供人群层面数据的预期目的。
家长和从业者希望有一个工具,能够促进围绕家庭系统中的发育、幸福和健康进行全面对话,同时专业人员能直接观察儿童。如果使用得当,该工具本身就能构成一种干预措施,因为它有助于构建关于家长如何支持孩子最佳成长和发育的对话。在健康与发育评估中,应考虑使用该工具的从业者的经验以及可获得的支持。