• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不断演变的社区卫生政策框架下的社区卫生系统能力:乌干达中部利益相关者的混合方法研究

Community health system capacities and capabilities within an evolving community health policy framework: mixed methods study of stakeholders in central Uganda.

作者信息

Kabanda Richard, Ocaatre Ronald Miria, Atwine Diana, Kim Bounggui, Waiswa Simon Erisa, Kavuma Prichard Denzel, Lee Yeni, Mutoni Loretah, Kim Solyi, Park Yein, Okuga Monica, Tweheyo Raymond

机构信息

Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):e082085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082085.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082085
PMID:39800393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11749817/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Empowering communities through identifying and unlocking community capacities and capabilities is vital for improving community health systems. This study assessed the community health system's status quo and readiness for implementing a government-led, partner-supported community health worker project.

DESIGN

A mixed methods cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Two districts and one city in central Uganda.

PARTICIPANTS

21 key informants (KIIs) with district leaders, 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) with community health workers (CHWs) termed as village health teams in the Ugandan setting and a survey of 487 CHWs and 419 pregnant women who had childbirth 12 months before.

STUDY MEASURES

KIIs and FGDs explored community health system resources using the WHO health systems building blocks and the UNICEF health system strengthening maturation model. However, the surveys explored the work-related attributes and services delivered by the CHWs and to the community, respectively.

ANALYSIS

A framework analysis was used for qualitative data in NVivo 14. While descriptive and stratified analyses were conducted for quantitative data in Stata I/C 15.0: proportions for the varied geographical entities were compared using the t-test with p values <0.05 considered significant, one-way ANOVA was used to compare means.

RESULTS

Overall, all sites had relatively strong governance of community health only challenged by multiple implementing partners that were weakly coordinated. There was an exclusive paper-based information management system that linked to the national DHIS-2 software. Community reporting rates varied between 20% and 80%. Community health financing was weak, similarly to commodities availability. The mean age of the community health workforce was high at 50.9 (SD 11.9); the majority reported adequate skills in service delivery except for community first aid, Kangaroo mother care and noncommunicable diseases. Households' most received CHW services included home visits, treatment for sick under-five children and child immunisation.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing CHW system has governance and reporting strengths but could be enhanced through revitalization, enhanced coordination of stakeholders, providing appropriate training, work tools, supervision and engaging the community for accountability of results.

摘要

目标

通过识别和释放社区能力来增强社区权能对于改善社区卫生系统至关重要。本研究评估了社区卫生系统的现状以及实施政府主导、伙伴支持的社区卫生工作者项目的准备情况。

设计

一项混合方法横断面研究。

背景

乌干达中部的两个区和一个市。

参与者

21名与 district leaders的关键信息提供者(KIIs),4次与社区卫生工作者(CHWs)的焦点小组讨论(FGDs),在乌干达背景下这些社区卫生工作者被称为乡村卫生团队,以及对487名社区卫生工作者和419名在12个月前分娩的孕妇进行的调查。

研究措施

KIIs和FGDs使用世界卫生组织的卫生系统构建模块和联合国儿童基金会的卫生系统强化成熟模型来探索社区卫生系统资源。然而,调查分别探索了社区卫生工作者提供给社区的与工作相关的属性和服务。

分析

在NVivo 14中使用框架分析对定性数据进行分析。在Stata I/C 15.0中对定量数据进行描述性和分层分析:使用t检验比较不同地理实体的比例,p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义,使用单因素方差分析比较均值。

结果

总体而言,所有地点的社区卫生治理相对较强,仅受到多个实施伙伴协调不力的挑战。存在一个与国家DHIS - 2软件相连的独家纸质信息管理系统。社区报告率在20%至80%之间。社区卫生筹资薄弱,物资供应情况类似。社区卫生工作队伍的平均年龄较高,为50.9岁(标准差11.9);除社区急救、袋鼠式护理和非传染性疾病外,大多数人报告在服务提供方面具备足够的技能。家庭接受最多的社区卫生工作者服务包括家访、为五岁以下患病儿童治疗和儿童免疫接种。

结论

现有的社区卫生工作者系统具有治理和报告方面的优势,但可通过振兴、加强利益相关者协调、提供适当培训、工作工具、监督以及让社区参与结果问责来加以加强。

相似文献

1
Community health system capacities and capabilities within an evolving community health policy framework: mixed methods study of stakeholders in central Uganda.不断演变的社区卫生政策框架下的社区卫生系统能力:乌干达中部利益相关者的混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):e082085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082085.
2
Barriers and benefits of mHealth for community health workers in integrated community case management of childhood diseases in Banda Parish, Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.乌干达坎帕拉班达区综合儿童疾病社区病例管理中移动医疗对社区卫生工作者的障碍和益处:一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 20;25(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02430-4.
3
Working with community health workers to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes: implementation and scale-up lessons from eastern Uganda.与社区卫生工作者合作以改善孕产妇和新生儿健康状况:来自乌干达东部的实施与扩大经验教训
Glob Health Action. 2017 Aug;10(sup4):1345495. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1345495.
4
Drugs for some but not all: inequity within community health worker teams during introduction of integrated community case management.部分人而非所有人可用的药物:在引入综合社区病例管理期间社区卫生工作者团队内部的不公平现象
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-S1-S1. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Engaging community health workers in maternal and newborn care in eastern Uganda.让社区卫生工作者参与乌干达东部的孕产妇和新生儿护理工作。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:23968. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.23968. eCollection 2015.
6
Effect of the Uganda Newborn Study on care-seeking and care practices: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.乌干达新生儿研究对寻求护理及护理实践的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:24584. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.24584. eCollection 2015.
7
The Uganda Newborn Study (UNEST): an effectiveness study on improving newborn health and survival in rural Uganda through a community-based intervention linked to health facilities - study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.乌干达新生儿研究(UNEST):通过与卫生机构相关联的以社区为基础的干预措施改善乌干达农村地区新生儿健康和生存的效果研究 - 一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Nov 15;13:213. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-213.
8
Enhancing Performance and Sustainability of Community Health Worker Programs in Uganda: Lessons and Experiences From Stakeholders.提高乌干达社区卫生工作者项目的绩效和可持续性:利益相关者的经验教训。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):855-868. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00260. Print 2021 Dec 31.
9
Landscape analyses of gaps in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health policies and guidelines to catalyse policy implementation improvement in Uganda.乌干达生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康政策与指南差距的态势分析,以促进政策实施改进
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 8;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01302-2.
10
Understanding Factors That Support Community Health Worker Motivation, Job Satisfaction, and Performance in Three Ugandan Districts: Opportunities for Strengthening Uganda's Community Health Worker Program.理解支持社区卫生工作者在乌干达三个地区的激励、工作满意度和绩效的因素:加强乌干达社区卫生工作者计划的机会。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 19;11(12):2886-2894. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6219. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation and evaluation of a pilot WHO community first aid responder training in Kinshasa, DR Congo: A mixed method study.刚果民主共和国金沙萨世界卫生组织社区急救响应者培训试点的实施与评估:一项混合方法研究
Afr J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;13(4):258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Impact of a recognition package as an incentive to strengthen the motivation, performance, and retention of village health teams in Uganda: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.激励增强乌干达乡村卫生团队的动力、绩效和留用:以认可包为激励的群组随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Jun 23;24(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07426-6.
3
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Africa: Lessons for Future Pandemics.
南非对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:对未来大流行的教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 30;19(11):6694. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116694.
4
Community Health Workers in Pandemics: Evidence and Investment Implications.社区卫生工作者在大流行病中的作用:证据与投资影响。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00648. Print 2022 Apr 28.
5
Can Cross-Sectional Studies Contribute to Causal Inference? It Depends.横断面研究能否有助于因果推断?这要看情况。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 6;192(4):514-516. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac037.
6
Enhancing Performance and Sustainability of Community Health Worker Programs in Uganda: Lessons and Experiences From Stakeholders.提高乌干达社区卫生工作者项目的绩效和可持续性:利益相关者的经验教训。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):855-868. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00260. Print 2021 Dec 31.
7
Scorecard metrics for assessing the extent of integration of community health worker programmes into national health systems.评估社区卫生工作者方案融入国家卫生系统程度的计分卡指标。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Nov 26;13(1):e1-e14. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2691.
8
The rural Uganda non-communicable disease (RUNCD) study: prevalence and risk factors of self-reported NCDs from a cross sectional survey.乌干达农村非传染性疾病(RUNCD)研究:横断面调查中自我报告的非传染性疾病的患病率和危险因素。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 7;21(1):2036. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12123-7.
9
Community health workers' job satisfaction in Ebola-stricken areas of Sierra Leone and its implication for COVID-19 containment: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.塞拉利昂埃博拉灾区社区卫生工作者的工作满意度及其对 COVID-19 防控的影响:一项横断面混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 20;11(10):e051645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051645.
10
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 2. Planning, coordination, and partnerships.新时代的社区卫生工作者:2. 规划、协调和伙伴关系。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):103. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00753-7.