Asken Breton M, Cid Rosie E Curiel, Crocco Elizabeth A, Armstrong Melissa J, Levy Shellie-Anne, Arias Franchesca, Rosselli Monica, Uribe Idaly Velez, Barker Warren W, Matusz Emily F, DeSimone Jesse C, Wang Wei-En, Fiala Jacob, Marsiske Michael M, DeKosky Steven T, Vaillancourt David E, Duara Ranjan, Loewenstein David A, Smith Glenn E
1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jan;12(1):100011. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100011. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinical diagnosis representing early symptom changes with preserved functional independence. There are multiple potential etiologies of MCI. While often presumed to be related to Alzheimer's disease (AD), other neurodegenerative and non-neurodegenerative causes are common. Wider availability of relatively non-invasive plasma AD biomarkers, such as p-tau217, can provide invaluable insights into MCI clinico-pathology and the associated implications for symptom etiology, prognosis (e.g., risk for progression to dementia), and treatment options.
The main goal of this study was to evaluate differences between individuals with MCI with and without plasma p-tau217 biomarker evidence of AD (MCI and MCI) as well as a control group of clinically normal older adults with negative AD biomarkers (CN). We evaluated group differences in demographics, recruitment, clinical scales, fluid biomarkers, and brain imaging. We further probed these factors as independent contributors to symptoms among MCI participants, for whom symptom etiology is most poorly understood. Lastly, in a subset of participants followed longitudinally, we investigated how these factors related to odds of clinical progression to dementia.
We conducted an observational cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical research study. Study groups were compared cross-sectionally on demographics, recruitment, clinical measures, and biomarkers (chi square analyses, analyses of covariance). Contributors to functional changes were evaluated with multiple linear regression. Factors associated with the odds of progression from MCI to dementia longitudinally were evaluated with binary logistic regression.
1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center.
Cross-sectional analyses included 378 older adults classified as CN (N = 76, age 66.1 ± 7.2, 63.2% female, 23.7% non-Hispanic/White), MCI (N = 198, age 68.9 ± 7.9, 51.5% female, 29.3% non-Hispanic/White), or MCI (N = 104, age 73.9 ± 7.4, 52.9% female, 49.0% non-Hispanic/White). Longitudinal analyses focused on 207 participants with MCI (68.5% of cross-sectional MCI sample) followed for an average of 3 years.
Demographics (age, sex, years of education, self-identified race and ethnicity, primary spoken language), National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center-defined clinical phenotypes (Clinically Normal, Impaired - Not MCI, Amnestic MCI, Nonamnestic MCI, Dementia), recruitment source (clinic-based versus community-based), genetics (APOE genotype), functional evaluation (Clinical Dementia Rating scale), global cognition (Mini Mental State Exam), vascular history (Vascular Burden Score), neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPI-Q Total score), plasma biomarkers (ALZPath p-tau217, Quanterix Simoa-based GFAP and NfL), and brain imaging (grey matter volume in select AD-relevant regions of interest, global white matter hyperintensity volume).
Among those with MCI, 104 (34.4%) had plasma biomarker evidence of AD. MCI participants were more frequently recruited from clinic-based settings than MCI (74.8% vs. 47.5%, p<.001). Over half (51.5%) of MCI carried at least one APOE e4 allele compared to 26.6% of MCI and 29.4% of CN (p<.001). Both MCI (p<.001, Cohen's d = 0.93) and MCI (p<.001, d = 0.75) reported more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms than CN MCI had higher plasma GFAP and NfL than both MCI (GFAP: p<.001, d = 0.88, NfL: p<.001, d = 0.86) and CN (GFAP: p<.001, d = 0.80; NfL: p<.001, d = 0.89). For the AD signature region of interest, MCI had lower volume than both CN (p<.001, d = 0.78) and MCI (p=.018, d = 0.39). For the hippocampus, both MCI (p<.001, d = 0.87) and MCI (p<.001, d = 0.64) had lower volume than CN. Longitudinally, older age (OR=1.14 [1.06-1.22], p<.001), higher levels of p-tau217 (OR=10.37 [3.00-35.02], p<.001) and higher neuropsychiatric symptoms (OR=1.19 [1.02-1.39], p=.023) were associated with higher odds of progression to dementia.
MCI is etiologically heterogeneous. The presence of Alzheimer's pathology defined by elevated plasma p-tau217 in individuals with MCI significantly worsens prognosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms may contribute to cognitive complaints and risk for progressive decline irrespective of AD pathology. Plasma p-tau217 can inform our understanding of base rates of different MCI phenotypes on a larger scale. As with other AD biomarkers, frequency of elevated plasma p-tau217 and odds of progression to dementia requires careful consideration of recruitment source (clinic- vs. community-based), especially across ethno-racially diverse older adults. Ongoing integration of emerging neurodegenerative disease biomarkers with detailed clinical evaluations will continue to improve treatment specificity and prognosis.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)是一种临床诊断,代表着早期症状变化且功能独立性得以保留。MCI有多种潜在病因。虽然通常认为与阿尔茨海默病(AD)有关,但其他神经退行性和非神经退行性病因也很常见。相对非侵入性的血浆AD生物标志物(如p-tau217)的更广泛应用,可为MCI的临床病理学以及症状病因、预后(如进展为痴呆的风险)和治疗选择的相关影响提供宝贵见解。
本研究的主要目标是评估有和没有血浆p-tau217生物标志物AD证据的MCI个体(MCI和MCI)之间的差异,以及AD生物标志物为阴性的临床正常老年人对照组(CN)之间的差异。我们评估了人口统计学、招募情况、临床量表、体液生物标志物和脑成像方面的组间差异。我们进一步探究这些因素作为MCI参与者症状的独立影响因素,因为MCI参与者的症状病因最不清楚。最后,在纵向随访的一部分参与者中,我们研究了这些因素与临床进展为痴呆几率的关系。
我们进行了一项观察性横断面和纵向临床研究。对研究组在人口统计学、招募情况、临床测量和生物标志物方面进行横断面比较(卡方分析、协方差分析)。使用多元线性回归评估功能变化的影响因素。使用二元逻辑回归评估与从MCI纵向进展为痴呆几率相关的因素。
1佛罗里达阿尔茨海默病研究中心。
横断面分析包括378名老年人,分为CN组(N = 76,年龄66.1±7.2,女性占63.2%,非西班牙裔/白人占23.7%)、MCI组(N = 198,年龄68.9±7.9,女性占51.5%,非西班牙裔/白人占29.3%)或MCI组(N = 104,年龄73.9±7.4,女性占52.9%,非西班牙裔/白人占49.0%)。纵向分析聚焦于207名MCI参与者(占横断面MCI样本的68.5%)进行平均3年的随访。
人口统计学(年龄、性别、受教育年限、自我认定的种族和民族、主要语言)、国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心定义的临床表型(临床正常、受损 - 非MCI、遗忘型MCI、非遗忘型MCI、痴呆)、招募来源(基于诊所与基于社区)、遗传学(APOE基因型)、功能评估(临床痴呆评定量表)、整体认知(简易精神状态检查)、血管病史(血管负担评分)、神经精神症状(神经精神症状问卷总分)、血浆生物标志物(ALZPath p-tau217、基于Quanterix Simoa的GFAP和NfL)以及脑成像(选定AD相关感兴趣区域的灰质体积、整体白质高信号体积)。
在MCI患者中,104名(34.4%)有血浆生物标志物AD证据。MCI参与者比MCI参与者更频繁地从基于诊所的环境中招募(74.8%对47.5%,p<.001)。超过一半(51.5%)的MCI患者携带至少一个APOE e4等位基因,而MCI患者为26.6%,CN组为29.4%(p<.001)。MCI组(p<.001,Cohen's d = 0.93)和MCI组(p<.001,d = 0.75)报告的神经精神症状比CN组更严重。MCI组的血浆GFAP和NfL水平高于MCI组(GFAP:p<.001,d = 0.88,NfL:p<.001,d = 0.86)和CN组(GFAP:p<.001,d = 0.80;NfL:p<.001,d = 0.89)。对于AD特征感兴趣区域,MCI组的体积低于CN组(p<.001,d = 0.78)和MCI组(p = 0.018,d = 0.39)。对于海马体,MCI组(p<.001,d = 0.87)和MCI组(p<.001,d = 0.64)的体积均低于CN组。纵向来看,年龄较大(OR = 1.14 [1.06 - 1.22],p<.001)、p-tau217水平较高(OR = 10.37 [3.00 - 35.02],p<.001)和神经精神症状较高(OR = 1.19 [1.02 - 1.39],p = 0.023)与进展为痴呆的较高几率相关。
MCI在病因上具有异质性。MCI个体中血浆p-tau217升高所定义的阿尔茨海默病病理学的存在显著恶化预后。无论AD病理学如何,神经精神症状可能导致认知主诉和进行性衰退的风险。血浆p-tau217可有助于我们在更大范围内理解不同MCI表型的基础比率。与其他AD生物标志物一样,血浆p-tau217升高的频率和进展为痴呆的几率需要仔细考虑招募来源(基于诊所与基于社区),尤其是在不同种族的老年人群体中。将新兴的神经退行性疾病生物标志物与详细的临床评估持续整合将继续提高治疗特异性和预后。