Wang Ling-Ling, Gao Yan, Yan Chao, Hu Hui-Xin, Lui Simon S Y, Wang Yi, Chan Raymond C K
School of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Psych J. 2025 Jun;14(3):328-336. doi: 10.1002/pchj.827. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
Anhedonia is believed to be transdiagnostic symptom exist in various disorders including schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. However, very few studies attempted to profile subclinical samples with schizophrenia, depressive, and autistic symptoms using measures of anhedonia scales. This study adopted a cluster analytical approach to examine the anhedonia profile in 46 individuals with schizotypal trait (ST), 43 subthreshold depression (SD), 27 autistic trait (AT), and 41 healthy controls. They completed a set of checklists capturing different dimensions of anhedonia including the anticipatory and consummatory interpersonal pleasure scale, the temporal experience of pleasure scale, the motivation and pleasure scale and the belief about pleasure scale. Cluster analysis was conducted on these measures among the merged sample of ST, SD, and AT. To validate the clusters, we administered measures on nonsocial reward processing, self-reported empathy, and social functioning. A three-cluster solution was found to be the best fit. Cluster 1 (n = 48) showed high pleasure experience, motivation, and belief about pleasure and spread evenly across three groups. Cluster 2 (n = 31) was characterized by low levels of anticipatory and consummatory pleasure specifically for the social domain, largely comprised of individuals with ST. Cluster 3 (n = 37) showed low levels of consummatory pleasure, motivation, and belief about pleasure, largely comprised of individuals with SD. The resultant clusters differed in social process and functioning. The current findings suggested distinct anhedonia subtypes within different subclinical populations. These findings may have implications for early detection and prevention for anhedonia.
快感缺失被认为是一种跨诊断症状,存在于包括精神分裂症、重度抑郁症和自闭症谱系障碍在内的各种疾病中。然而,很少有研究尝试使用快感缺失量表来描述具有精神分裂症、抑郁和自闭症症状的亚临床样本。本研究采用聚类分析方法,对46名具有分裂型特质(ST)的个体、43名阈下抑郁症(SD)患者、27名具有自闭症特质(AT)的个体和41名健康对照者的快感缺失情况进行了研究。他们完成了一组清单,以获取快感缺失的不同维度,包括预期性和满足性人际愉悦量表、愉悦的时间体验量表、动机和愉悦量表以及对愉悦的信念量表。对ST、SD和AT的合并样本中的这些测量指标进行了聚类分析。为了验证聚类结果,我们对非社交奖励处理、自我报告的同理心和社交功能进行了测量。结果发现,三聚类解决方案是最合适的。第1组(n = 48)表现出较高的愉悦体验、动机和对愉悦的信念,且在三组中分布均匀。第2组(n = 31)的特点是在社交领域的预期性和满足性愉悦水平较低,主要由具有ST的个体组成。第3组(n = 37)表现出较低的满足性愉悦、动机和对愉悦的信念,主要由患有SD的个体组成。最终的聚类在社交过程和功能方面存在差异。目前的研究结果表明,不同亚临床人群中存在不同的快感缺失亚型。这些发现可能对快感缺失的早期发现和预防具有启示意义。