Comprehensive Management Approaches for Acute Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability Post distal End Radius Fracture.

INTRODUCTION

The peripheral radioulnar articulation and the bony radioulnar articulation make up the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), a diarthrodial trochoid synovial joint stabilizers for soft tissues. Of the DRUJ's stability, only around 20% may be attributed to the bony articulation. Treatment for DRUJ injuries resulting from a solely ligamentous rupture varies and is subject to debate. Usually, non-operative care is coupled with occupational therapy, activity modification, brace or splint immobilization, and pain management.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze comprehensive management approaches for acute DRUJ instability post-distal radius fracture.The key takeaway from the article is that TFCC repair may not be essential, with K-wire stabilization providing better range of motion and cast immobilization offering stronger grip, but further large-scale controlled trials are required to fully assess these treatment options in terms of patient satisfaction and functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After primary fixation of the respective fractures (distal end radius fracture or distal end ulna fracture or both) by ORIF with Plating or CRIF with K-wiring or by Traction for casting, the distal radio ulna joint instability is stabilized by casting, closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) with K-wiring or open triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair and the outcome is measured by grip strength, range of motion with DASH and MMWS scores by follow up and compared.

RESULTS

Between the groups, there was no discernible variation in grip strength (P > 0.05). A noteworthy variation in flexion was seen among the groups (P < 0.05). The groups' differences in extension were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Pronation did not significantly differ across the groups (P > 0.05). Supination did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). The DASH scores of the groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). Between the groups, there was a significant difference in MMWS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The major findings of analysis have suggested that the time, effort, and cost of TFCC repair do not appear to be necessary, however, there may be trade-offs between various treatments, with K-wire stabilization offering a better range of motion and cast immobilization a stronger grip.