Ryland Howard
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust.
BJPsych Adv. 2025 Jan;31(1):36-38. doi: 10.1192/bja.2024.40. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
Navigating the complex relationship between violence and psychosis can frequently be challenging. Psychiatrists may find assessing and managing the risk of violence in this context daunting. In their article 'The clinical assessment of violence in the context of psychosis: taking a phenomenological stance', Andreson et al. helpfully summarise the role that psychopathology can play in this process. While careful elucidation of an individual's experiences may assist in the nuanced formulation of their risk and could offer a specific focus for interventions, the approach has potential shortcomings in certain settings. For some phenomena the link with violence is unclear and it may be constellations of symptoms that are important. Causal pathways are not always linear and there may be important mediators linking psychopathological features to behavioural outcomes. In the resource limited settings in which many contemporary health services operate, a detailed assessment of psychopathology may be hampered by time or other constraints. Alternative, more scalable solutions may therefore be needed in particular scenarios.
处理暴力与精神病之间的复杂关系常常具有挑战性。精神科医生可能会发现在这种情况下评估和管理暴力风险令人望而生畏。在他们的文章《精神病背景下暴力行为的临床评估:采取现象学立场》中,安德森等人有益地总结了精神病理学在这一过程中可能发挥的作用。虽然仔细阐明个体的经历可能有助于对其风险进行细致入微的评估,并可为干预措施提供具体重点,但这种方法在某些情况下存在潜在缺陷。对于某些现象,其与暴力的联系尚不清楚,可能是症状组合才是重要的。因果路径并不总是线性的,可能存在将精神病理特征与行为结果联系起来的重要调节因素。在许多当代医疗服务所运营的资源有限的环境中,对精神病理学的详细评估可能会受到时间或其他限制的阻碍。因此,在特定情况下可能需要替代性的、更具可扩展性的解决方案。