• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

距离和方向很重要:印度喀拉拉邦一个垃圾场周边居民的风险认知

Distance and Direction Matters: Risk Perception Among Residents Around a Dump Yard in Kerala, India.

作者信息

Payyappilly Antony Paul, Babu Priya, Nair Manju R

机构信息

Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jan 8;18:65-76. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S491900. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S491900
PMID:39802344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11725276/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Waste mismanagement is a growing concern in developing countries where unsustainable practices such as open dumping and open burning are rampant. This study examined the risk perceptions of the residents living in proximity to the Brahmapuram dump yard, situated in Ernakulam district of Kerala State, India- A site marked by persistent local protests, public outrage, and legal disputes arising from issues related to waste mismanagement. The study focused on the geospatial and sociodemographic factors that might influence these perceptions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 302 respondents living within 4 kilometers from the borders of the dump yard using a structured interview schedule. The responses of the participants were used to compute a risk perception score, which reflected participants' risk perception regarding the environment and their health.

RESULTS

Among the participants in the study, those who lived within 2 kilometers (2.3 (95% CI 0.96, 3.7; p<0.001)), those who lived to the east (2.7 (95% CI 1.1, 4.2; p<0.001)) and those who reported perceiving strong malodor from the dump yard (2.0 (95% CI 0.54, 3.4; p=0.007)), had a higher risk perception in the multivariate linear regression model. Women had a lesser risk perception compared to men (-2.6 (95% CI -3.7, -1.4; p<0.001)).

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the importance of geospatial characteristics (distance and direction), malodor and gender differences in shaping the risk perceptions among the proximate residents living around a waste dump yard. Consideration of geospatial and sociodemographic determinants in risk assessment and management could potentially reduce the perceived risks and public discontent around waste management facilities.

摘要

目的

在发展中国家,垃圾管理不善问题日益受到关注,在这些国家,露天倾倒和露天焚烧等不可持续做法十分猖獗。本研究调查了居住在印度喀拉拉邦埃纳库拉姆区布拉马普尔姆垃圾场附近居民的风险认知。该垃圾场因垃圾管理不善问题引发了持续的当地抗议、公众愤怒和法律纠纷。研究聚焦于可能影响这些认知的地理空间和社会人口因素。

患者与方法

采用结构化访谈问卷,对居住在距垃圾场边界4公里范围内的302名受访者进行了横断面调查。参与者的回答用于计算风险认知得分,该得分反映了参与者对环境和自身健康的风险认知。

结果

在研究参与者中,居住在2公里范围内的人(2.3(95%可信区间0.96,3.7;p<0.001))、居住在东部的人(2.7(95%可信区间1.1,4.2;p<0.001))以及报告从垃圾场闻到强烈恶臭的人(2.0(95%可信区间0.54,3.4;p=0.007)),在多变量线性回归模型中的风险认知更高。女性的风险认知低于男性(-2.6(95%可信区间-3.7,-1.4;p<0.001))。

结论

研究结果凸显了地理空间特征(距离和方向)、恶臭和性别差异在塑造垃圾场周边居民风险认知方面的重要性。在风险评估和管理中考虑地理空间和社会人口决定因素可能会降低对垃圾管理设施的感知风险和公众不满。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/11725276/7a84f5859d47/RMHP-18-65-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/11725276/7a84f5859d47/RMHP-18-65-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/11725276/7a84f5859d47/RMHP-18-65-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Distance and Direction Matters: Risk Perception Among Residents Around a Dump Yard in Kerala, India.距离和方向很重要:印度喀拉拉邦一个垃圾场周边居民的风险认知
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jan 8;18:65-76. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S491900. eCollection 2025.
2
Geospatial Analysis of Malaria and Typhoid Prevalence Due to Waste Dumpsite Exposure in Kinshasa Districts with and Without Waste Services: A Case Study of Bandalungwa and Bumbu, Democratic Republic of Congo.基桑加尼市区有无废物处理服务的垃圾场暴露导致疟疾和伤寒流行的地理空间分析:刚果民主共和国班达卢恩瓦和邦布案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;21(11):1495. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111495.
3
Risk Perceptions and Experiences of Residents Living Nearby Municipal Solid Waste Open Dumpsite in Ginchi Town, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.埃塞俄比亚金奇镇附近城市固体废弃物露天垃圾场居民的风险认知与经历:一项定性研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 18;14:2035-2044. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S309295. eCollection 2021.
4
Micro-plastics in the Vicinity of an Urban Solid Waste Management Facility in India: Assessment and Policy Implications.印度城市固体废物管理设施附近的微塑料:评估与政策影响
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2022 Dec;109(6):956-961. doi: 10.1007/s00128-022-03588-2. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
5
Assessing chromite ore processing residue (COPR) waste dump site using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT): a case study from Umaran, Kanpur, India.利用电阻率层析成像技术(ERT)评估铬铁矿加工残渣(COPR)废渣堆场:印度坎普尔乌马拉恩的案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jul 24;191(8):504. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7646-2.
6
[Impact perception on health, social and physical environments of the municipal solid waste disposal site in Cali].[卡利市固体废弃物处理场对健康、社会和自然环境的影响认知]
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2009 Aug;11(4):549-58. doi: 10.1590/s0124-00642009000400006.
7
Soil degradation around Orji municipal solid waste dump site: a spatial assessment.奥吉市垃圾填埋场周围的土壤退化:空间评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Oct 7;196(11):1025. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-13126-8.
8
A follow-up of cancer incidence among former Finnish dump site residents: 1999-2011.芬兰 former 垃圾场居民癌症发病率随访研究:1999 - 2011 年。 注:这里“former”不太明确准确意思,根据语境推测可能是“之前的”“曾经的”等意思,你可根据实际情况进一步确认和调整。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2014 Oct;20(4):313-7. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000080.
9
Health conditions and occupational risks in a novel group: waste pickers in the largest open garbage dump in Latin America.健康状况与职业风险:拉丁美洲最大露天垃圾场拾荒者群体
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 16;19(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6879-x.
10
Report on waste dump sites around Bangalore.班加罗尔周边垃圾倾倒场报告。
Waste Manag. 2006;26(6):640-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.06.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Residential Proximity, Duration, and Health-Related Quality of Life: Insights from the Fernald Cohort.居住距离、时长与健康相关生活质量:来自费纳德队列研究的见解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 7;22(5):738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050738.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-assessing global municipal solid waste generation.重新评估全球城市固体废物产生量。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Apr;41(4):936-947. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221074116. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
Odor emissions: A public health concern for health risk perception.气味排放:对健康风险感知的公共健康关注点。
Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt B):112121. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112121. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Perceived Risk in the Population Living near the Turin Incinerator: Comparison between before and at Three Years of Operation.居住在都灵焚化炉附近人群的感知风险:运行前与运行三年后的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):9003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179003.
4
Municipal Solid Waste Management and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.城市固体废弃物管理与不良健康结局:一项系统综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;18(8):4331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084331.
5
Who feels a greater environmental risk? Women, younger adults and pro-environmentally friendly people express higher concerns about a set of environmental exposures.谁感到更大的环境风险?女性、年轻人和环保人士对一系列环境暴露表现出更高的担忧。
Environ Res. 2020 Feb;181:108918. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108918. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Proximity (Mis)perception: Public Awareness of Nuclear, Refinery, and Fracking Sites.临近(误)感知:公众对核设施、炼油厂和水力压裂场地的认知。
Risk Anal. 2020 Feb;40(2):385-398. doi: 10.1111/risa.13387. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
7
Vulnerability assessment of areas allocated for municipal solid waste disposal systems: a case study of sanitary landfill and incineration.城市固体废物处理系统分配区域的脆弱性评估:以卫生填埋和焚烧为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Sep;26(26):27239-27258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05920-6. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Health and Environmental Risks of Residents Living Close to a Landfill: A Case Study of Thohoyandou Landfill, Limpopo Province, South Africa.居民居住在垃圾填埋场附近的健康和环境风险:以南非林波波省托霍延多垃圾填埋场为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 15;16(12):2125. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122125.
9
Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues.发展中国家的废物管理不善:全球问题综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 24;16(6):1060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061060.
10
Public Perceptions of Environmental Public Health Risks in the United States.公众对美国环境公共卫生风险的认知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 22;16(6):1045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061045.