Purohit Rudri, Wang Shuaijie, Bhatt Tanvi
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
PhD program in Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Biomechanics (Basel). 2023 Mar;3(1):29-44. doi: 10.3390/biomechanics3010003. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
We examined the effect of aging and cortical stroke on the rate of motor adaptation (adaptation rate) and amount of performance gains (adaptation plateau) in balance skills. Fourteen older (≥60 years) and fifteen younger (<60 years) adults with chronic stroke, and thirteen healthy older adults (≥60 years) participated. Participants experienced 8 consecutive gait-slips (≤45 cm) to their non-paretic/dominant limb. Slip outcome (backward/no balance loss) was compared using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Proactive (pre-slip stability) and reactive adjustments (post-slip stability, slip displacement and velocity, and compensatory step length) were compared using non-linear regression models. GEE showed the main effect of group, trial, and group × trial interaction for slip outcome ( < 0.05). There were no differences in the adaptation rate for proactive and reactive variables and plateau for proactive variables ( > 0.05). However, both stroke groups demonstrated a smaller adaptation plateau for the majority of reactive variables compared to healthy older adults ( < 0.05). The rate of adaptation to gait-slips does not slow with aging and cortical stroke; however, cortical stroke, age notwithstanding, may reduce performance gains in reactive balance skills, possibly hindering retention and transfer to real-life scenarios. People with stroke may need adjunctive therapies/supplemental agents to apply laboratory-acquired balance skills to daily life.
我们研究了衰老和皮质中风对平衡技能中运动适应率(适应率)和表现提升量(适应平台期)的影响。十四名年龄较大(≥60岁)和十五名年龄较小(<60岁)的慢性中风成年人,以及十三名健康的年龄较大(≥60岁)成年人参与了研究。参与者对其非瘫痪/优势肢体连续经历8次步态滑倒(≤45厘米)。使用广义估计方程(GEE)比较滑倒结果(向后/无平衡丧失)。使用非线性回归模型比较主动(滑倒前稳定性)和反应性调整(滑倒后稳定性、滑倒位移和速度以及补偿步长)。GEE显示组、试验以及组×试验交互作用对滑倒结果有主要影响(<0.05)。主动和反应性变量的适应率以及主动变量的平台期没有差异(>0.05)。然而,与健康的年龄较大成年人相比,两个中风组在大多数反应性变量上的适应平台期较小(<0.05)。对步态滑倒的适应率不会随着衰老和皮质中风而减慢;然而,尽管有年龄因素,皮质中风可能会降低反应性平衡技能的表现提升,可能会阻碍向现实生活场景的保留和转移。中风患者可能需要辅助治疗/补充剂来将实验室获得的平衡技能应用于日常生活。