• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

漫画中精神事件的不协调处理:角色推理的轮廓

Processing Incongruity for Mental Events in Comics: Contours of Character Inferences.

作者信息

Klomberg Bien, Fadeeva Klavdiia, Schilperoord Joost, Cohn Neil

机构信息

Tilburg University.

出版信息

Metaphor Symb. 2024 Dec 31;40(1):51-75. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2024.2417215. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/10926488.2024.2417215
PMID:39802613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11716651/
Abstract

Visual narratives, like comics, at times show depictions of characters' imagination, dreams, or flashbacks, which seem incongruent with the ongoing primary narrative. Such "domain constructions" thus integrate an auxiliary domain (e.g. a dream) within the primary domain (the expected, physical storyworld), and may require readers to resolve seemingly non-co-referential figures as co-referential (e.g. when a character's dream shows that character as an animal). In three self-paced reading experiments, we investigate the processing and understanding of single vs. multiple domains in sequences with co-reference issues (Exp. 1) and whether graphic cues facilitate such domain switches (Exp. 2 and 3). Domain switches incurred greater updating costs but were comprehensible, with greater similarity across panels predicting faster processing, and comic reading experience affecting viewing times. The successful integration of fantasized agents which seem to lack co-reference implies that visual narrative comprehension goes beyond event and scene perception alone, but also involves proficiency in conventional constructions related to perspective-taking and inferencing.

摘要

视觉叙事,比如漫画,有时会展现角色的想象、梦境或闪回的画面,这些似乎与正在进行的主要叙事不一致。这样的“领域构建”因此将一个辅助领域(比如一个梦境)整合到主要领域(预期的、物质的故事世界)中,并且可能要求读者将看似非共指的人物理解为共指的(比如当一个角色的梦境中该角色是一只动物时)。在三项自定步速阅读实验中,我们研究了在存在共指问题的序列中对单个领域与多个领域的处理和理解(实验1),以及图形线索是否有助于这种领域切换(实验2和实验3)。领域切换会产生更大的更新成本,但仍是可理解的,各面板间更高的相似性预示着处理速度更快,并且漫画阅读经验会影响观看时间。对看似缺乏共指的幻想主体的成功整合意味着视觉叙事理解不仅超越了对事件和场景的感知,还涉及到与换位思考和推理相关的传统构建方面的熟练程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/b9207c87a5ec/HMET_A_2417215_F0009_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/16530f85f73a/HMET_A_2417215_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/88f0be9a894b/HMET_A_2417215_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/f920fd0d50af/HMET_A_2417215_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/d68bfa226876/HMET_A_2417215_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/efce9356a4ea/HMET_A_2417215_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/a67c179e4d24/HMET_A_2417215_F0006_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/97b7a07f025a/HMET_A_2417215_F0007_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/57f9bd2f6782/HMET_A_2417215_F0008_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/b9207c87a5ec/HMET_A_2417215_F0009_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/16530f85f73a/HMET_A_2417215_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/88f0be9a894b/HMET_A_2417215_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/f920fd0d50af/HMET_A_2417215_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/d68bfa226876/HMET_A_2417215_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/efce9356a4ea/HMET_A_2417215_F0005_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/a67c179e4d24/HMET_A_2417215_F0006_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/97b7a07f025a/HMET_A_2417215_F0007_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/57f9bd2f6782/HMET_A_2417215_F0008_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d6/11716651/b9207c87a5ec/HMET_A_2417215_F0009_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Processing Incongruity for Mental Events in Comics: Contours of Character Inferences.漫画中精神事件的不协调处理:角色推理的轮廓
Metaphor Symb. 2024 Dec 31;40(1):51-75. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2024.2417215. eCollection 2025.
2
What is your neural function, visual narrative conjunction? Grammar, meaning, and fluency in sequential image processing.你的神经功能是什么,视觉叙事连接?连续图像处理中的语法、意义和流畅性。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0064-5. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
Embodiment during reading: Simulating a story character's linguistic actions.阅读中的具身性:模拟故事角色的语言行为。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):364-75. doi: 10.1037/a0034853. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
An electrophysiological investigation of co-referential processes in visual narrative comprehension.视觉叙事理解中同指过程的电生理学研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jul 29;172:108253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108253. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
5
Does the character-based dimension of stories impact narrative processing? An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.故事的基于字符的维度是否会影响叙事处理?一项事件相关电位 (ERP) 研究。
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01070-1. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Zooming in on visual narrative comprehension.聚焦视觉叙事理解。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):451-466. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01101-w. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension.飞向梦幻岛:读者在阅读理解过程中如何隐性地评判规范。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1250-9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0436-8.
8
Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking.通过体验替代改变信念和行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul;103(1):1-19. doi: 10.1037/a0027525. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
9
Your Brain on Comics: A Cognitive Model of Visual Narrative Comprehension.漫画中的大脑:视觉叙事理解的认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):352-386. doi: 10.1111/tops.12421. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Managing Mental Representations During Narrative Comprehension.叙事理解过程中的心理表征管理
Discourse Process. 2004 Apr;37(2):145-164. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3702_4.

本文引用的文献

1
Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension.构建还是更新?视觉叙事理解过程中的事件模型处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2092-2101. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
lab.js: A free, open, online study builder.lab.js:一个免费的、开放的、在线的研究构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):556-573. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5.
3
A starring role for inference in the neurocognition of visual narratives.推理在视觉叙事的神经认知中的重要作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 15;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00270-9.
4
Cross-codal integration of bridging-event information in narrative understanding.跨码 bridging-event 信息在叙事理解中的整合。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Aug;48(6):942-956. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01039-z.
5
The Scene Perception & Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) Applied to Visual Narratives.场景感知与事件理解理论(SPECT)在视觉叙事中的应用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):311-351. doi: 10.1111/tops.12455. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
6
Your Brain on Comics: A Cognitive Model of Visual Narrative Comprehension.漫画中的大脑:视觉叙事理解的认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):352-386. doi: 10.1111/tops.12421. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
7
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
8
Filling the gap despite full attention: the role of fast backward inferences for event completion.尽管全神贯注仍填补空白:快速反向推理在事件完成中的作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jan 28;4(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0151-2.
9
Understanding Moment-to-Moment Processing of Visual Narratives.理解视觉叙事的即时处理。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2999-3033. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12699. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
Listening beyond seeing: Event-related potentials to audiovisual processing in visual narrative.超越视觉的聆听:视觉叙事中视听加工的事件相关电位
Brain Lang. 2018 Oct;185:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jul 6.