Suppr超能文献

构建还是更新?视觉叙事理解过程中的事件模型处理。

Construction or updating? Event model processes during visual narrative comprehension.

机构信息

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Schleichstr. 6, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2092-2101. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02424-w. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

Abstract

The plot of a narrative is represented in the form of event models in working memory. Because only parts of the plot are actually presented and information is continually changing, comprehenders have to infer a good portion of a narrative and keep their mental representation updated. Research has identified two related processes (e.g., Gernsbacher, 1997): During model construction (shifting, laying a foundation) at large coherence breaks an event model is completely built anew. During model updating (mapping) at smaller omissions, however, the current event model is preserved, and only changed parts are updated through inference processes. Thus far, reliably distinguishing those two processes in visual narratives like comics was difficult. We report a study (N = 80) that aimed to map the differences between constructing and updating event models in visual narratives by combining measures from narrative comprehension and event cognition research and manipulating event structure. Participants watched short visual narratives designed to (not) contain event boundaries at larger coherence breaks and elicit inferences through small omissions, while we collected viewing time measures as well as event segmentation and comprehensibility data. Viewing time, segmentation, and comprehensibility data were in line with the assumption of two distinct comprehension processes. We thus found converging evidence across multiple measures for distinct model construction and updating processes in visual narratives.

摘要

叙事的情节以事件模型的形式存在于工作记忆中。由于情节的实际呈现只包含部分内容,且信息在不断变化,因此理解者必须推断出叙事的大部分内容,并不断更新他们的心理表征。研究已经确定了两个相关的过程(例如,Gernsbacher,1997):在大连贯性的转变过程中,一个事件模型会被完全重新构建;而在较小的省略中,当前的事件模型被保留,只有通过推理过程更新变化的部分。到目前为止,在像漫画这样的视觉叙事中可靠地区分这两个过程是困难的。我们报告了一项研究(N=80),该研究旨在通过结合叙事理解和事件认知研究的测量方法,并操纵事件结构,来映射视觉叙事中构建和更新事件模型的差异。参与者观看了简短的视觉叙事,这些叙事在大连贯性的转变处设计为(不)包含事件边界,并通过小省略来引出推理,同时我们收集了观看时间测量值以及事件分割和可理解性数据。观看时间、分割和可理解性数据与两个不同的理解过程的假设一致。因此,我们在多个测量指标上找到了视觉叙事中不同模型构建和更新过程的一致证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec55/11543759/65cf4a584834/13423_2023_2424_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验