Suppr超能文献

980纳米二极管激光与10600纳米二氧化碳激光治疗牙龈色素沉着的对比研究

A Comparative Study of the Use of a 980 nm Diode Laser and 10600nm CO2 in the Treatment of Gingival Melanin Pigmentation.

作者信息

Birang Reza, Sadeghi Sayed Mohsen, Birang Ehsan, Birang Nafiseh, Fekrazad Reza, Soltani Samaneh, Chiniforush Nasim, Yaghini Jaber

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.

出版信息

J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Dec 7;15:e61. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.61. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Gingival depigmentation with the help of lasers is known as an effective technique. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of 980nm diode and CO2 lasers in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation. In this clinical trial study, 14 individuals (8 females and 6 males) with the age range of 19 to 47 years were selected. One quadrant was randomly treated with CO2 laser (10600 nm, non-contact, super pulse mode) and the opposite quadrant was treated with a diode laser (980 nm, continuous wave [CW], 1.5 W). The area of the pigmented region, Dummett oral pigmentation index (DOPI), the amount of changes in the RGB parameter (red, green, blue) and Δ* in clinical photographs before, one and three months after the treatment were calculated by ImageJ and Photoshop software. Pain and discomfort were assessed one hour, one day and one week later by the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, after 3 months, the cosmetic results achieved for the different therapeutic approaches were evaluated by patients and professional evaluator. Data were analyzed by the paired samples test, repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon test. The results of this study showed that the duration of CO2 laser treatment was statistically and significantly shorter than the time of 980-diode laser treatment (<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the pigmented lesion area (>0.05), RGB parameter (>0.05), DOPI index (>0.05) and ΔE parameter (>0.05) in one month and three months after treatment follow-ups between the two types of lasers. There was no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction (>0.05) and professional evaluation (>0.05) between the two groups of lasers. Post-treatment pain scores were not statistically significant between the two groups. Both 980-nm diode laser and 10600-nm CO2 are effective in the treatment of gingival depigmentation while CO2 laser radiation with super pulse mode is faster in terms of operating time. While working with the diode laser is more controllable. IRCT20200309046728N1; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/.

摘要

借助激光进行牙龈色素沉着去除是一种有效的技术。本研究的目的是比较980nm二极管激光和二氧化碳激光治疗牙龈色素沉着过度的效果。在这项临床试验研究中,选取了14名年龄在19至47岁之间的个体(8名女性和6名男性)。一个象限随机接受二氧化碳激光治疗(10600nm,非接触式,超脉冲模式),相对的象限接受二极管激光治疗(980nm,连续波[CW],1.5W)。通过ImageJ和Photoshop软件计算治疗前、治疗后1个月和3个月临床照片中色素沉着区域的面积、达米特口腔色素沉着指数(DOPI)、RGB参数(红、绿、蓝)的变化量以及Δ*。在1小时、1天和1周后通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛和不适情况。此外,3个月后,由患者和专业评估人员对不同治疗方法所取得的美容效果进行评估。数据采用配对样本检验、重复测量方差分析和威尔科克森检验进行分析。本研究结果表明,二氧化碳激光治疗的持续时间在统计学上显著短于980二极管激光治疗的时间(<0.05)。在治疗后1个月和3个月的随访中,两种激光在色素沉着病变面积(>0.05)、RGB参数(>0.05)、DOPI指数(>0.05)和ΔE参数(>0.05)方面均无统计学显著差异。两组激光在患者满意度(>0.05)和专业评估(>0.05)方面无统计学显著差异。两组治疗后的疼痛评分无统计学显著差异。980nm二极管激光和10600nm二氧化碳激光在治疗牙龈色素沉着去除方面均有效,而超脉冲模式的二氧化碳激光在操作时间上更快。而使用二极管激光时更易于控制。IRCT20200309046728N1;https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验