Moeintaghavi Amir, Ahrari Farzaneh, Fallahrastegar Amir, Salehnia Asma
Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Feb 22;13:e8. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.08. eCollection 2022.
Gingival hyperpigmentation is an esthetic concern for some individuals. This study compared the effectiveness of CO and diode lasers for gingival depigmentation. This randomized, split-mouth, clinical trial consisted of 12 patients with the chief complaint of hyperpigmented gingival areas. The upper right and left anterior segments and the mandibular anterior segment were randomly allocated to one of the treatment groups. The segments in group 1 underwent gingival depigmentation with a diode laser (810 nm) at 6 W and pulsed mode, whereas group 2 was ablated with a diode laser at 3 W and continuous mode. The removal of gingival pigments in group 3 was contemplated with a CO laser (10600 nm, 3 W, continuous mode). The operation chair time, bleeding during the procedure and post-operative pain were recorded. The gingival color and esthetic appearance were measured before the operation and at 1 week and 6 months later. There was no significant difference in the bleeding scores, pain level, and color alteration values between the groups (>0.05). The operation chair time was significantly shorter when the diode laser was applied at pulsed mode (<0.05). The segments treated with the diode laser (pulsed or continuous mode) showed a higher esthetic appearance at the 6-month follow-up compared to those ablated with the CO laser (<0.05). Higher esthetic appearance is expected when using the diode laser for gingival depigmentation compared to the CO2 laser. The application of the diode laser at pulsed mode could be recommended for gingival depigmentation, as it produced pleasing esthetic outcomes at reduced chair time.
牙龈色素沉着对一些人来说是一个美观问题。本研究比较了CO激光和二极管激光用于牙龈色素沉着治疗的效果。这项随机、双侧对照的临床试验纳入了12例以牙龈色素沉着为主诉的患者。右上和左上前部区域以及下颌前部区域被随机分配到其中一个治疗组。第1组的区域采用6W二极管激光(810nm)以脉冲模式进行牙龈色素沉着治疗,而第2组则采用3W二极管激光以连续模式进行消融。第3组采用CO激光(10600nm,3W,连续模式)进行牙龈色素去除。记录手术椅旁时间、术中出血情况和术后疼痛情况。在手术前、术后1周和6个月时测量牙龈颜色和美观外观。各组之间的出血评分、疼痛程度和颜色改变值无显著差异(>0.05)。当二极管激光以脉冲模式应用时,手术椅旁时间显著缩短(<0.05)。与采用CO激光消融的区域相比,采用二极管激光(脉冲或连续模式)治疗的区域在6个月随访时显示出更高的美观外观(<0.05)。与CO2激光相比,使用二极管激光进行牙龈色素沉着治疗有望获得更高的美观外观。二极管激光以脉冲模式应用可推荐用于牙龈色素沉着治疗,因为它在缩短椅旁时间的同时产生了令人满意的美观效果。