Ahmed Anas A, Mojiri Mohammed E, Daghriri Ali A, Hakami Ohoud A, Alruwaili Reem F, Khan Rayan A, Madkhali Hassan A, Almania Manar M, Hakami Zaher T, Mashraqi Khadijah O, Adawi Khowlah A, Alqattan Sadeel A, Alharbi Ahmad N, Albahlol Malek A, Moafa Atheer I
Community Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 10;16(12):e75505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75505. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) is a global challenge, leading to prolonged waiting times and adverse patient outcomes. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution, enabling remote consultation, triage, and real-time specialist input. Despite its growing application, limited systematic research exists on its specific role in ED triage and care. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in ED settings, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, patient satisfaction, throughput times, and re-admission rates. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted up to November 10, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English that assessed telemedicine in ED settings. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the modified Downs and Black scale. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that telemedicine improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced re-consultation rates, and enhanced treatment adherence. High diagnostic concordance with in-person assessments was observed, particularly in non-critical cases. Several studies reported shorter throughput times and higher patient satisfaction with telemedicine compared to traditional care. However, telemedicine's impact on high-acuity cases, such as emergency airway management, was less pronounced. Limitations included small sample sizes and the inability to blind participants, which may have influenced outcomes. Telemedicine holds significant potential to improve ED triage and care in non-critical cases, reducing waiting times and enhancing patient outcomes. Further research is needed to establish its efficacy in high-acuity settings and address challenges related to infrastructure and privacy. Telemedicine should complement in-person care as part of an integrated ED strategy.
急诊科的过度拥挤是一项全球性挑战,会导致候诊时间延长以及对患者产生不良后果。远程医疗已成为一种很有前景的解决方案,能够实现远程会诊、分诊以及专家实时参与。尽管其应用日益广泛,但关于它在急诊科分诊和护理中具体作用的系统性研究仍然有限。本系统评价评估了远程医疗干预措施在急诊科环境中的有效性,重点关注诊断准确性、患者满意度、诊疗时间以及再入院率。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,截至2024年11月10日,对PubMed、科学网、Scopus以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)数据库进行了全面检索。符合条件的研究为英文随机对照试验(RCT),评估了急诊科环境中的远程医疗。两名独立评审员筛选研究、提取数据,并使用改良的唐斯和布莱克量表评估方法学质量。六项RCT符合纳入标准。结果表明,远程医疗提高了诊断准确性,降低了再次会诊率,并增强了治疗依从性。观察到与面对面评估具有较高的诊断一致性,尤其是在非危急病例中。几项研究报告称,与传统护理相比,远程医疗的诊疗时间更短,患者满意度更高。然而,远程医疗对诸如紧急气道管理等高急症病例的影响不太明显。局限性包括样本量小以及无法使参与者设盲,这可能影响了结果。远程医疗在改善非危急病例的急诊科分诊和护理方面具有巨大潜力,可减少候诊时间并改善患者结局。需要进一步研究以确定其在高急症环境中的疗效,并应对与基础设施和隐私相关的挑战。远程医疗应作为综合急诊科策略的一部分补充面对面护理。