Emergency Department, University Hospital, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule [RWTH] Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule [RWTH] Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;15(7):1275-1279. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02323-1. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility and safety of telemedicine for dermatological emergency patients in the emergency department. This observational study was monocentric, open, prospective and two-arm randomized [control group (n = 50) and teledermatology group (n = 50)]. The control group was conventionally recruited directly by a dermatologist. In the teledermatology group patients, images of the skin lesions and clinical parameters were transferred to a tablet PC (personal computer) by an emergency physician and telemedically assessed by a dermatologist without patient contact. Subsequently, the dermatologist, who was previously telemedically contacted, then personally examined the patient in the emergency department. The treatment time between the control group and the teledermatology group was also recorded and compared. The agreement in suspected diagnosis between teledermatological evaluation and clinical evaluation of the same physician in the teledermatology group was 100%. The treatment time [mean (minutes) ± standard deviation] of the control group was 151 ± 71, that of the teledermatology group was 43 ± 38 (p < 0.001). The use of emergency telemedicine is safe and effective and provides a viable alternative for clinical care of emergency patients.
本研究旨在探讨远程医疗在皮肤科急诊患者中的可行性和安全性。这是一项单中心、开放性、前瞻性、双臂随机对照[对照组(n=50)和远程皮肤科组(n=50)]研究。对照组由皮肤科医生常规直接招募。在远程皮肤科组中,由急诊医生将皮肤病变的图像和临床参数传输到平板电脑(PC)上,并由皮肤科医生进行远程评估,无需与患者接触。随后,之前远程联系过的皮肤科医生亲自在急诊科检查患者。还记录并比较了对照组和远程皮肤科组之间的治疗时间。远程皮肤科评估与远程皮肤科组中同一医生的临床评估之间的疑似诊断的一致性为 100%。对照组的治疗时间[平均值(分钟)±标准差]为 151±71,远程皮肤科组为 43±38(p<0.001)。紧急远程医疗的使用是安全有效的,为急诊患者的临床护理提供了可行的替代方案。