• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量CT肺癌筛查:一项系统评价

Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose CT: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Pacheco Pedro, Melo Vanda, Martins Cátia, Ribeiro Helena

机构信息

Family Health Unit New Directions, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave, Vizela, PRT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Dec 11;16(12):e75515. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75515. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.75515
PMID:39803135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11718421/
Abstract

Lung cancer is highly prevalent worldwide and is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Portugal. There is increasing evidence that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces mortality; however, few countries have implemented screening strategies. This review aims to gather the best evidence to assess the relevance of implementing lung cancer screening. A search was conducted for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses (MAs) published between January 1, 2010, and January 31, 2024, as well as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1, 2019, and January 31, 2024, indexed in databases such as the National Guideline Clearinghouse, Cochrane Library, Guideline Finder, Canadian Medical Association, Evidence-Based Medicine Online, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), and PubMed. The MeSH terms used were "lung cancer" and "screening". To evaluate the level of evidence (LE) and strength of recommendation (SR) in the included MAs, the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) from the American Academy of Family Physicians was applied. A total of 460 articles were found, with two CPGs, six MAs, two SRs, and one RCT being selected. The CPGs recommend screening with LDCT for smokers with a smoking history of more than 20 pack-years, aged between 50 and 80 years. All MAs show statistically significant evidence of reduced mortality in screened patients, although without a reduction in all-cause mortality. However, there was some heterogeneity regarding the age of the target population and the screening follow-up period. Overdiagnosis rates varied between MAs. The SRs and RCT also demonstrated a reduction in lung cancer mortality, but not in all-cause mortality. LDCT lung cancer screening shows a reduction in disease-related mortality, suggesting that the implementation of organized screening for at-risk populations could have a significant positive impact. Some uncertainties remain regarding the best strategy for implementing organized screening programs.

摘要

肺癌在全球范围内高度流行,是葡萄牙癌症相关死亡的主要原因。越来越多的证据表明,低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查可降低死亡率;然而,很少有国家实施筛查策略。本综述旨在收集最佳证据,以评估实施肺癌筛查的相关性。检索了2010年1月1日至2024年1月31日期间发表的临床实践指南(CPG)、系统评价(SR)和荟萃分析(MA),以及2019年1月1日至2024年1月31日期间发表的随机对照试验(RCT),这些文献被收录在国家指南交换中心、考克兰图书馆、指南查找器、加拿大医学协会、循证医学在线、效果评价文摘数据库(DARE)和PubMed等数据库中。使用的医学主题词为“肺癌”和“筛查”。为了评估纳入的荟萃分析中的证据水平(LE)和推荐强度(SR),应用了美国家庭医生学会的推荐强度分类法(SORT)。共找到460篇文章,选择了两篇临床实践指南、六篇荟萃分析、两篇系统评价和一项随机对照试验。临床实践指南建议对吸烟史超过20包年、年龄在50至80岁之间的吸烟者进行LDCT筛查。所有荟萃分析均显示,筛查患者的死亡率有统计学意义的降低,尽管全因死亡率没有降低。然而,在目标人群年龄和筛查随访期方面存在一些异质性。不同荟萃分析的过度诊断率有所不同。系统评价和随机对照试验也显示肺癌死亡率降低,但全因死亡率未降低。LDCT肺癌筛查显示疾病相关死亡率降低,这表明对高危人群实施有组织的筛查可能会产生重大的积极影响。关于实施有组织筛查计划的最佳策略仍存在一些不确定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63da/11718421/1bca7fc64baa/cureus-0016-00000075515-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63da/11718421/1bca7fc64baa/cureus-0016-00000075515-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63da/11718421/1bca7fc64baa/cureus-0016-00000075515-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose CT: A Systematic Review.低剂量CT肺癌筛查:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Dec 11;16(12):e75515. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75515. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌相关死亡率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.
5
Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.低剂量计算机断层扫描在高危人群中的肺癌筛查:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(69):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta22690.
6
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.针对40至49岁患乳腺癌平均风险女性的乳腺钼靶筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Plasma-Based Biomarker for Lung Cancer Screening in China.中国基于血浆标志物的低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的成本效益。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13634.
9
Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.40 岁及以上成年人在初级保健中进行脆性骨折一级预防的筛查:筛查和治疗效果及可接受性以及风险预测工具准确性的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 21;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.
10
Do we know enough about the effect of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer on survival to act? A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.对于低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌对生存率的影响,我们了解得是否足够充分从而采取行动?一项对随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析。
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Nov 28;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0067-4. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.肺癌筛查:美国癌症协会 2023 年指南更新。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):50-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21811. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
2
Estimates and Projections of the Global Economic Cost of 29 Cancers in 204 Countries and Territories From 2020 to 2050.2020 年至 2050 年全球 29 种癌症在 204 个国家和地区的全球经济成本估计和预测。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):465-472. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7826.
3
Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in Europe: Taking a Systems Approach.
在欧洲实施肺癌筛查:采用系统方法。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Apr 22;3(5):100329. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100329. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Lung cancer survival and sex-specific patterns in Portugal: A population-based analysis.葡萄牙肺癌生存率及性别特异性模式:一项基于人群的分析。
Pulmonology. 2023 Dec;29 Suppl 4:S70-S79. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
5
Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.肺癌筛查:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告。
Chest. 2021 Nov;160(5):e427-e494. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.063. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT in Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.吸烟者低剂量CT肺癌筛查:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 5;11(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061040.
7
Epidemiology of lung cancer.肺癌流行病学
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021;25(1):45-52. doi: 10.5114/wo.2021.103829. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
8
Implementation of lung cancer screening: what are the main issues?肺癌筛查的实施:主要问题有哪些?
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):1050-1063. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-985.
9
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.
10
Cancer-Specific Mortality, All-Cause Mortality, and Overdiagnosis in Lung Cancer Screening Trials: A Meta-Analysis.肺癌筛查试验中的癌症特异性死亡率、全因死亡率和过度诊断:荟萃分析。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Nov;18(6):545-552. doi: 10.1370/afm.2582.